I’m so confused. First it was Cooling (1970’s), the Warming (1980s-early 2000’s) then “Climate Change” “Warming” (last few years).
Now it’s back to Cooling?
Just as all the little environmental dictators get together to have an Apocalyptic Warming Conference where they all agree that they should run everyone and everything and make everyone poor and only they’ll be rich. It’s for your own good. đ
They call the Conference by the telling name of COP 21. COP, Freaudian slip? đ
SCIENTISTS claim we are in for a decade-long freeze as the sun slows down solar activity by up to 60 per cent.
A team of European researchers have unveiled a scientific model showing that the Earth is likely to experience a âmini ice ageâ from 2030 to 2040 as a result of decreased solar activity.
Their findings will infuriate environmental campaigners who argue by 2030 we could be facing increased sea levels and flooding due to glacial melt at the poles.
However, at the National Astronomy Meeting in Wales, Northumbria University professor Valentina Zharkova said fluctuations an 11-year cycle of solar activity the sun goes through would be responsible for a freeze, the like of which has not been experienced since the 1600s.
From 1645 to 1715 global temperatures dropped due to low solar activity so much that the planet experienced a 70-year ice age known as Maunder Minimum which saw the River Thames in London completely frozen.Â
The researchers have now developed a “double dynamo “model that can better predict when the next freeze will be.
Based on current cycles, they predict solar activity dwindling for ten years from 2030.
Professor Zharkova said two magnetic waves will cancel each other out in about 2030, leading to a drop in sun spots and solar flares of about 60 per cent.
Sunspots are dark concentrations of magnetic field flux on the surface that reduce surface temperature in that area, while solar flares are burst of radiation and solar energy that fire out across the solar system, but the Earth’s atmosphere protects us from the otherwise devastating effects.
She said: “In cycle 26, the two waves exactly mirror each other, peaking at the same time but in opposite hemispheres of the Sun.Â
“We predict that this will lead to the properties of a âMaunder minimum.
âOver the cycle, the waves fluctuate between the Sunâs northern and southern hemispheres. Combining both waves together and comparing to real data for the current solar cycle, we found that our predictions showed an accuracy of 97 per cent.”
Research colleagues Simon Shepherd of Bradford University, Helen Popova of Lomonosov Moscow State University and Sergei Zarkhov of the University of Hull used magnetic field observations from 1976 to 2008 at the Wilcox Solar Observatory at Stanford University.
A Royal Astronomical Society spokesman said: “It is 172 years since a scientist first spotted that the Sunâs activity varies over a cycle lasting around 10 to 12 years.Â
The theory is likely to infuriate environmentalists who fear the globe is heating up.
I HOPE SO. đ
“But every cycle is a little different and none of the models of causes to date have fully explained fluctuations.”
The âdouble dynamoâ theory appears to support claims of researchers who argue Earth will soon experience major global cooling due to lower solar activity as the sun goes into a sustained period of hibernation.
Environmentalists meanwhile claim global temperatures will increase over the period unless we drastically reduce carbon emissions.
DO AS WE SAY OR YOU’RE ALL DOOMED! đ
The Pol on the website so far:
Do you think the world will get hotter or colder from 2030?
Yes, by the sound of it we are in for a very long winter  43%
No, I believe that the Earth is gradually heating up and we are responsible so have to cut carbon  3%
I think it could go either way and will carry on fluctuating  26%
Why worry, it is out of our hands  24%
Even if there is a mini ice age after it will keep warming in the long run 4%
Since the people ain’t buying it’s up to the Politicians to force them to, after all that’s how Science works. đ
John Hawkins: How radical, weird and out of touch have liberals on college campuses gotten since Obama came into office? Itâs worse than you ever thought and although there is an almost unlimited number of problematic incidents to choose from, these 15 are particularly effective at getting across how bad things have become.
1) âCollege Students Say Remembering 9/11 Is Offensive to Muslims…. The everything-is-offensive brand of campus activism has struck a new low: Students at the University of Minnesota killed a proposed moment of silence for 9/11 victims due to concernsâinsulting, childish concernsâthat Muslim students would be offended.â
2) âPortland State University Offers Course Teaching How to ‘Make Whiteness Strange’…According to Portland State University Professor Rachel Sandersâ ‘White Privilege’ course, ‘whiteness’ must be dismantled if racial justice will ever be achieved. The course description states that ‘whiteness is the lynchpin of structures of racial meaning and racial inequality in the United Statesâ and claims that ‘to preserve whiteness is to preserve racial injustice.’ Students taking the course will ‘endeavor to make whiteness strange.’ In order to make whiteness strange, the description says students must ‘interrogate whiteness as an unstable legal, political, social, and cultural construction.’â
Â
3) “A University in the San Francisco Area Actually Told Students To Call 911 if They Were Offended….Administrators at a Catholic university in the San Francisco Bay Area have rescinded an official school policy instructing students to clog up the regional 9-1-1 emergency reporting system to report ‘bias incidents.’
The school is Santa Clara University, reports Campus ReformâŚUntil this month, however, Santa Clara administrators have been instructing students to report ‘bias incidents’ using the emergency service reserved for dispatching police, firefighters and ambulances.
‘If the bias incident is in progress or just occurred: ALWAYS CALL 911 IMMEDIATELY,’ the Santa Clara website instructed students in fierce, all-capital letters.”
âŚFor all you folks who went to school back when there were only him and her â hereâs a primer: some of the new gender neutral pronouns are ze, hir, zir, xe, xem and xyr.â
5) âA Professor at Polk State College has allegedly failed a humanities student after she refused to concede that Jesus is a âmythâ or that Christianity oppresses women during a series of mandatory assignments at the Florida college. According to a press release from the Liberty Counsel, a non-profit public interest law firm, Humanities Professor Lance âLjâ Russum gave a student a âzeroâ on four separate papers because the 16-year-old did not âconform to his personal worldviews of Marxism, Atheism, Feminism, and homosexuality.â The law firm has called for a full, private investigation of the professor and the course curriculum.â
7) âThe phrase ‘politically correct’ is now a microaggression according to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. The universityâs ‘Just Words’ campaign is the work of UWMâs ‘Inclusive Excellence Center’ and aims to ‘raise awareness of microaggressions and their impact’âmicroaggressions like ‘politically correct’ or ‘PC.’â
Â
8) ) “‘American,’ ‘illegal alien,’ ‘foreigners,’ ‘mothering,’ and ‘fathering’ are just a handful of words deemed ‘problematic’ by the University of New Hampshireâs Bias-Free Language Guide….Saying ‘American’ to reference Americans is also problematic. The guide encourages the use of the more inclusive substitutes ‘U.S. citizen’ or ‘Resident of the U.S.’ The guide also tries to get students to stop saying ‘Caucasian,’ ‘illegal Immigrant,’ ‘mother,’ ‘father’ and even the word ‘healthy’ is said to shame those who aren’t healthy.”
9) âLate yesterday afternoon, ACLJ filed a lawsuit on behalf of Brandon Jenkins against officials of The Community College of Baltimore County (CCBC) in Maryland for denying Brandon admission to its Radiation Therapy Program in part due to his expression of religious beliefs. As one faculty member explained to Brandon, on behalf of CCBC, the âfield [of radiation therapy] is not the place for religion.ââ
12) “Clemson University apologizes for serving Mexican food…Students took to Twitter to call the event culturally insensitive and to question the school’s efforts to promote diversity….Clemson Dining issued an apology to ‘offended’ students after hosting a ‘Maximum Mexican’ food day.”
<hum “everything’s Awesome” from The LEGO movie, just change it to “offensive” while reading this wallop of crybabiness.
Students at the University of Minnesota killed a proposed moment of silence for 9/11 victims due to concerns that Muslim students would be offended.
Theo Menon, a Minnesota Student Association representative realized that the university wasnât doing anything to memorialize 9/11.
So, on October 6, he introduced an MSA proposal to asking the university to institute a âmoment of recognitionâ during the mornings of all future September 11ths.
The resolution in no way referred to Islam or to whether Islam itself is to blame for global terrorism. It did not require anyone to contemplate the fact that the terrorists responsible for 9/11 were Muslims. âIt merely stated that 9/11 has had a lasting effect on many students, and ought to be reflected upon for a single moment, once a year.â (Star Tribune)
Islamophobia and racism âŚÂ are alive and well. I just donât think that we can act like something like a moment of silence for 9/11 would exist in a vacuum when worldwide, Muslim and Middle Eastern folks undergo intense acts of terrorism around the 11th of September each year, and have since 2001.
Should some tell these mindless idiots that Muslims are not a race? That Arabs are not a race?
This has had a serious impact on the mental health of many Muslim Americans. A 2009 study of New York Muslims found that the vast majority of participants said they felt extremely safe prior to September 11. After the attacks, however, 82 percent reported that they felt âextremely unsafe. A study two years later. In 2011, a study of Muslim Americans led by psychologist Mona M. Amer, found that many of the subjects suffered from anxiety, depression, and even Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) from being doubly traumatized, first by the attacks themselves and then by the blame they received afterwards. (muftah.org)
THEY ARE THE VICTIMS! how Liberal is that…
But according to the Minnesota Republic, the resolution proved oddly controversial. MSA Director of Diversity and Inclusion, David Algadi, voiced âsevere criticismâ of the resolution.
At-large MSA representative and Director of Diversity and Inclusion David Algadi voiced severe criticism of the resolution. He also made sure to emphasize 9/11âs status as a national tragedy in his response.
âThe passing of this resolution might make a space that is unsafe for students on campus even more unsafe,â said Algadi, âIslamophobia and racism fueled through that are alive and well.â
âThe passing of this resolution might make a space that is unsafe for students on campus even more unsafe,â he said. Algadi expressed concerns- in an email to the Washington Post â that efforts to recognize 9/11 are sometimes âthinly-veiled expressions of Islamophobia.â
Algadi was not the only one with this opinion. A majority of student government representatives sided with him, voting down the resolution in a 36-23 vote this month. If students had their way, there would be no moment of silence at UMN on Sept. 11, 2016.
But after the university became âinundatedâ with demands for a rebuke of the vote, UMN President Eric Kaler announced that he would formalize the moment of silence anyway. Kaler told the local press that he âwanted to make sure folks were aware that the U is committed to honoring the victims.â
As the writer for the Daily Beast noted: ââŚthere are people who blame all Muslims for the actions of a radical fewâŚwe should argue against these sentiments, and we should work to end the terrible acts of revenge-violence against innocent Muslim Americans.â But he also added that Americans should still be allowed to take a âsingle moment out of our days to mourn the thousands of victimsâMuslims among themâof the 9/11 terrorist attacks.â
According to the Daily Beast, âthe everything-is-offensive brand of campus activism has struck a new low.â (Leo Affairs)
Then we have Paris. đ
The response, on the student associationâs Facebook site, was swift.
âAre we allowed to publicly, on campus, mourn for Paris or would that be too offensive to some?â wrote one commenter.
âAbsolutely despicable,â wrote another. âYou should be ashamed of yourselves.â
On Friday, the association released a statement, saying: âMuch of the coverage of this resolution has revolved around the discussion of the potential perpetuation of Islamophobia. While this was certainly a valid and unanswered concern of the body, much of the discussion ⌠on this resolution also revolved around logistics of how a moment of recognition could be implemented.â
It went on to say that many members âvoiced support for holding a moment of recognition for the victims of 9/11,â but faulted the resolution for not spelling out how âthis could be done.â It said the group had âreached out to the authorâ to work on redrafting the resolution for a future vote.
Let the The Blame Game begin. Along with denial…
Â
Surprised by opposition
Menon, a 17-year-old freshman from Rogers, Minn., who sponsored the resolution, said the opposition took him by surprise. âI did not believe that this would be at all a point of contention,â he said.
Of course not, your tiny, mindless Orwellian brain could conceive of it. After all, your reality says you are “sensitive”. đ
He said there was no mention at the meeting of bringing the issue up for another vote. âThey did not table it; they voted it down,â he said. âOnly after this ⌠backlash from the public did they release this statement saying it was going to be reconsidered.â
Leaders of the student association declined a request for an interview.
But the U, which said it supported the resolution, released a statement responding to what was described as âa great deal of confusionâ about the vote.
The only confusion is in your tiny Liberal minds that couldn’t conceive or handle the criticism.
âFollowing the vote, the students decided to take a step back and ensure that any 9/11 resolution that is passed includes the detail necessary to successfully implement a worthy form of recognition on campus,â said the statement from Vice Provost Danita Brown Young. âThe maturity to want a more comprehensive resolution should be applauded.â
The immaturity of having to “show maturity” after the fact is the problem, buttheads!
Menon said that heâs rewriting the resolution and that he plans to submit it for a vote at the next meeting, on Nov. 24. This time, he said, he believes it will pass. (Star Tribune).
It did, apparently from the Executive Board but the MSA still has it “on it’s calendar”.
Reason #47,321 to be glad youâre not a liberal: You get to enjoy your holiday and allow those around you to enjoy theirs. Not so for our left-wing counterparts, who mostly disdain Thanksgiving â along with Columbus Day, Independence Day, Flag Day, Christmas, Easter, etc. â freighting it with their liberal guilt and contempt for any one or thing that doesnât reflect their enlightened world-view.
So while youâre eagerly tucking into your turkey and happily plopping potatoes on your plate, spare a thought for those fated to suffer through Thanksgiving though they know that what the Pilgrims wrought is nothing to celebrate.
Pass the bio degradable tissues and prepare to have your consciousness raised (yes, itâs as painful as it sounds). Here are five reasons liberals hate Thanksgiving, and want you to hate it too.
1.Liberals hate Thanksgiving because it is racist. Yes thatâs right, Thanksgiving is all about that white supremacy! âIt is reserved by history and the intent of âthe foundersâ as the supremely white American holiday, the most ghoulish event on the national calendar.â One glass of white privilege to wash down the white meat please!
2. Liberals hate Thanksgiving because it is sexist. Sure, you can guess that because we often think of women slaving away in the kitchen while the men watch football. But hereâs a little food for thought: according to liberal feminists, Thanksgiving is sexist because there just arenât enough lady balloons in the Macyâs Thanksgiving Day Parade!
3.Liberals hate Thanksgiving because itâs killing the environment. Climate change is the last thing anyone wants to hear on Thanksgiving. Let that conversation burn in the oven with the forgotten dinner rolls.
4. Liberals hate Thanksgiving because itâs anti animal rights. Liberals want you to âcarry that weightâ of guilt and shame knowing your perfectly moist and seasoned turkey suffered and was murdered on its journey to your dinner table. Instead liberals want you to take a hard stance on animal rights and opt for a nice slice of raw broccoli loaf.
5.Liberals hate Thanksgiving because itâs a holiday for celebrating genocide. Thanksgiving, aka âEuropeansâ genocidal campaign against indigenous people to acquire the land base of the United States.â Above all else, Thanksgiving is a time to channel your inner sociopath, according to liberals. Without those Europeans invading an unknown land and conquering all those Native Americans you wouldnât have a reason to carve a turkey!
But if youâre a normal human being, you know that Thanksgiving is a wonderful time to share with family and friends giving thanks for the freedoms and blessings this great nation has to offer. (Newsbusters)
I personally had friends over that don’t have any family to celebrate with so we celebrate together and we had a good meal,a good time and I did a lot of the cooking.
Happy Thanksgiving to all with a true classic of Thanksgiving courtesy of “WKRP IN CINCINNATI” (1978). (much better than talking Gun Control over the Bird as Our Dear Leader wants…)
Classic TV History.com: This month, in a series of entirely new interviews, members of the showâs cast and crew (along with the ârealâ Herb Tarlek) reminisced about the making of this historic half-hour.
HUGH WILSON (creator and producer of WKRP in Cincinnati): The starting point was that I was a young, kind of new writer at Mary Tyler Moore Productions â MTM.
MICHAEL ZINBERG (director of âTurkeys Awayâ): It was in the heyday of MTM. We often referred to it as Camelot, which it was. Those shows were hand-crafted. It was a remarkable group of writers and directors and producers, headed by Grant Tinker. Hugh Wilson came out from Atlanta, and in three years was creating his own show. Thatâs what the possibilities were.
CLARKE BROWN (radio executive): Hugh first started in the business as an account executive for Burton-Campbell Advertising. He was about to get fired, and they said, âWait a minute, donât fire this guy. This guy could be a great writer.â They moved him into a copywriting position, and he became arguably the best copywriter thatâs ever been in Atlanta, Georgia. Later he became the creative director, and ultimately he became the president of the agency. Then he abruptly left. He got a divorce, and without a job or anything, he moved to California and ended up almost immediately getting a job with Mary Tyler Moore.
HUGH WILSON: Grant Tinker, who was Maryâs husband, let it be known one day in the most casual of ways that if anybody had any show ideas, they should tell him. I know pilot season [now] is more important than Versailles, but in the day he just said that. Anyhow, I was working on a short-lived show, two seasons, called The Tony Randall Show. Tony had had great success with The Odd Couple, and we did this. It never quite worked, but that was what I was doing. Anyhow, I got this idea for a radio station [series], and I told Grant, and we went over to CBS, and they all said, âYeah, hey, great.â What was lucky for me was that most of those guys . . . had at one time or another been in the radio business. I hadnât counted on having that kind of built-in affection for the idea.
So I went back to Atlanta, where I had some real good friends, at what was the number one rocker there, and I sat down with the station manager and told him what was going on. He was very excited, because it was [about] radio and also because it was good publicity.
CLARKE BROWN: WKRP was based on the radio station WQXI in Atlanta, and there were several characters who were very much based on people at QXI, and the others were sometimes amalgamations and sometimes just completely fictionalized. I was Herb Tarlek.
HUGH WILSON: Clarke Brown was a salesman at WQXI, and I based Herb Tarlek on him, although Clarkeâs a pretty cool guy. But Clarke was dressing in these pretty bizarre polyester outfits back in the day.
CLARKE BROWN: Not to that extreme, but I was kind of known for dressing wildly, mod clothing and so forth. But he was making fun of me, essentially. It just made me laugh.
HUGH WILSON: The character of Johnny Fever, he was based on a guy I knew in Atlanta called Skinny Bobby Harper. That was funny, because he was the morning guy, so Skinny had to get up at four in the morning to get in there. But he also loved being in the bars at night. He was like Fever â in the pilot, I said [to Howard Hesseman], âYouâve got to play it like youâre sleepwalking, because you should be asleep by eight, but eight is just when youâre going out.â
CLARKE BROWN: Jerry Blum was âthe Big Guy,â Arthur Carlson, and there was another guy that some of his personality was in the character also. His name was Doug Burton, and he was the Burton of Burton-Campbell.
HUGH WILSON: Jerry Blum was a little bit of Mr. Carlson, and Carlson is actually more of a wonderful man that I worked for in Atlanta advertising. He was my boss. He was a great, great guy.
CLARKE BROWN: The location was [changed to Cincinnati] because of its central location, with no accents. And obviously, âWKRP,â âW-crapâ was the pun intended.
Hugh kind of worked with me in the mornings. One day heâd go and sit in the control room, and then one day heâd sit in the sales office, and he absorbed the actual workings of a radio station firsthand in that manner. Then, of course, he and I were drinking buddies, so he heard every story that was worth repeating over the years.  When Hugh was writing the show, a lot of the incidents were real.
HUGH WILSON: I was allowed to see everything, and then Jerry Blum, the station manager, told me about a promotion â I believe in Texas, and I want to say Dallas, but Iâm not sure â in which he threw turkeys out of a helicopter, and they didnât fly. They crashed to the ground, it was just a horrible disaster, and he wound up losing his job over it. So I said to him at the time, âJerry, I think you just won me an Emmy.â
CLARKE BROWN: The turkey drop was actually a real incident. It was at a shopping center in Atlanta; I think it was Broadview Plaza, which no longer exists. It was a Thankgiving promotion. We thought that we could throw these live turkeys out into the crowd for their Thanksgiving dinners. All of us, naĂŻve and uneducated, thought that turkeys could fly. Of course, they went just fuckinâ splat.
People were laughing at us, not with us. But it became a legend. There were other stories of this nature that were embellished [on WRKP]; that one was really not embellished that much.  Although the turkeys were thrown off the back of a truck, as opposed to how it was depicted on the [show].
HUGH WILSON: I didnât dream up the helicopter. My memory is Jerry said a helicopter.
CLARKE BROWN: It just ended with, the jokeâs on us. And of course, our guys played it up. It turned out to be a great little unintended publicity gimmick, the fact that it failed the way that it did. Probably got more mileage out of it being screwed up than had it not been.
HUGH WILSON: Since that time, a couple of people have claimed that story, but Jerry said it was him. Heâs the one that said to me, âYou know, Hugh, turkeys canât fly.â
CLARKE BROWN: It is very possible that another radio station at some point in time had done something similar. But I know for a fact that we had no conscious awareness that it had been done elsewhere, successfully or not. We werenât deliberately trying to clone somebodyâs promotion. Not that we wouldnât do that, because clearly we would, and have. But not that particular day.
HUGH WILSON: It didnât matter to me whether it was true or who did it. I knew I could use it on the show. We decided that we would make it our Thanksgiving show of the first season, which I think was the sixth one we did.
The teleplay for âTurkeys Awayâ is credited to the late Bill Dial.
HUGH WILSON: He was a friend of mine from Atlanta, from the agency I worked with, that I had brought out too, because I thought he was good, and also I felt that somehow or other I had been let past the guards at one of these great studios, and now my job was to sneak in as many friends as I could.
CLARKE BROWN: A lot of people from Atlanta were involved with that show â his writers and music people. A guy named Tommy Wells, who just recently died, did the music for the show and wrote the theme song.
HUGH WILSON: I just thought [Bill Dial] kind of missed it completely. Dial, bless his heart, would tell you the same. He got the credit and I think he kind of dined out on it, but you know, I pretty much wrote every word.
The premise of âTurkeys Awayâ is a kind of continuation of the pilot, in which station manager Arthur Carlson (Gordon Jump) begins to feel left out and unappreciated following WKRPâs format change under the new program director, Andy Travis (Gary Sandy).
HUGH WILSON: That made sense to me. The pilot was about a whole change there, and it would make sense that this guy, a dear man but an inept man, would want to reinsert himself into it. It would be fun [to have] him to engineer it, rather than the angry Herb Tarlek. It was good that Herb be his lieutenant. Herb and Les, they kind of sided with the old guard, so it was great to have all of them on the wrong side of this.
Seeking to ingratiate himself with the staff, Carlson makes fumbling overtures to all of them. To African American deejay Venus Flytrap, he proffers a watermelon.
TIM REID (âVenus Flytrapâ): That actually came from a true story! This was way back in 1968, about four years removed from the [start of] the Civil Rights movement. Iâd just come out of college. I was claimed as the first black hire to be a marketing representative for this company.   Iâm not going to call the companyâs name, but it was a major corporation and I was the first black hired in management. Anybody with a college degree in a white company was looked upon as just landed from PlanetUniversity. Nobody really knew quite how to deal with us. We were all in training together, and there was a lot of joking, a lot of racial joking, and everybody got their turn in the barrel.
The person who [gave me the watermelon] was from the Deep South and I was from the South, and we had really been giving each other a pretty good row at the time. I had given as much as I got. It was a touchĂŠ kind of thing, because I had really done something to him earlier. Letâs just say I showed up in a sheet. [Laughs.] But that one topped it.  Then the shit hit the fan. Everybody realized, Oh my god, this really isnât funny. This has gone too far. So then the pressure all came to me as to how am I going to respond to it. Which I never thought was quite fair.
That person and I never became great friends, but we â I saved his job, actually. They were going to fire him because of that when word got around. He came to me, very sadly, and asked, and I called [the bosses] and said, âLook, this was a give and take. I donât want to waste my opportunities on this one. Let me save them for when I really need a chit.â  I knew he had learned his lesson, and I certainly had learned mine.
A lot of things in our lives became seeds of a story, or elements of a story. Oftentimes when Hugh was writing, heâd talk to you, and youâd say something and heâd laugh and walk away. Then youâd look up and it would be in the script. Hugh would say, âCan I tell that?â And I go, âI dunno.â So, suddenly, innocently, Carlson doesnât know what to do and he handed me a watermelon!
âTurkeys Awayâ has an extraordinarily slow build to its famous ending. Arthur Carlsonâs much-hyped secret promotion doesnât emerge until the second act, and just what it is not revealed until the last few minutes.
HUGH WILSON: If youâve got a real hot piece of comedy that you like, you sure donât want to put it up front. I tried hard to make it the climax, where the climax is supposed to be.
MAX TASH: We started with the table read on Mondays, and we would shoot on Fridays. There would be a big rewrite Tuesday nights, and then usually a smaller rewrite on Wednesday night.
TIM REID: It was a great table read. Weâd get the script a day or so before table read, so you know going in whether or not youâve got something thatâs going to be a lot of fun to do. And we all just couldnât wait to get there. I think itâs one of the first times in four years that we were all ever on time for a table read.
The classic payoff commences when Les Nessmanâs live broadcast from the shopping centerâs parking lot quickly becomes a bloodbath â one that echoes another famous disaster.
HUGH WILSON: I put in the thing that Les would be present, and I wrote that whole thing that made it sound like the Hindenburg and all of that.
TIM REID: The opportunity to see Les Nessman recount the falling of the turkeys in the style of the Hindenburg was just, tears to your eyes. I mean, who takes on the Hindenburg, and does a comedy? Takes one of the great tragedies in this country, and puts it in a comedy show? We went there.
People donât give us credit for a few firsts, but WKRP was the first television show to do an episode about Vietnam [âWho Is Gordon Sims?,â in which Venus Flytrap is revealed to have been a draft dodger]. Lou Grant did one after us, but we were the first, and it was so touchy and so difficult, that they sent the military to sit in the stands every day in the rehearsal. It was literally going to be up to a commander from Camp Pendleton, that somebody had brought up as our advisor.  He was going to watch us rehearse for at least two to three days, and it was going to be his decision. And if he said âno,â we were not going to do the episode.
MAX TASH (production associate): âTurkeys Awayâ was probably the most famous episode we did of that whole series, but there was an episode we did called âLes on a Ledge,â which had Les Nessman on the ledge of the Flimm Building, contemplating suicide because one of the Cincinnati Reds baseball players made a comment about Les after he had done an after-game interview, saying, âWhat a queer little fellow he is.â So he took that to mean they think heâs gay. And it was the third or fourth episode that we produced of this brand new sitcom, that was dealing with this issue, in a very funny way. But that episode, to me, stood out even more than âTurkeys Awayâ because it showed the direction that the series was eventually going to go in.
Les quotes the famous line from Herbert Morrisonâs radio coverage of the Hindenburg crash: âOh, the humanity!â
HUGH WILSON: You know what, weâd put in a line, and invariably somebody from the network would say, âI donât believe people, particularly younger people, know what that line about the Hindenburg means.â And my answer was always, âSo what?â They were always deathly afraid that we would be going over peopleâs heads. We did a commercial once that was for a beer where it said, âLook for the smiling face of Archduke Ferdinand on every bottle!â Somebody said, âHugh, it was his assassination that started World War I.â And I said, âSo what?â
The oft-told story is that Richard Sanders (âLes Nessmanâ) closely modeled his performance on Morrisonâs broadcast.
MICHAEL FAIRMAN (guest star as the âShoe Store Owner,â and Richard Sandersâs friend and writing partner on several WKRP scripts): We both listened to it together at one point. It was Richardâs idea. He said, âWhy donât I announce it as if it were [the Hindenburg broadcast]?â
TIM REID: We all did! We all sat in the room and we watched the actual crashing of the Hindenburg as it was recorded [in newsreel footage], over and over, and we sat there as he [Sanders] did it. And he did it so well. If you look at him and look at the guy who gave the report on the Hindenburg, youâll see the similarities.
MICHAEL FAIRMAN: Richard is an interesting guy. Very â oh, whatâs the word? Very ordered. Kind of strait-laced, kind of tight. Sometimes weâd have little battles about that. He had a very dramatic, teutonic kind of personality. It had to be this way or that way. He was very much like Les Nessman. Compulsive, a little bit. But a good guy, at base.
GARY SANDY (âAndy Travisâ): Richard Sanders was my favorite character on the show. I thought Richard was incredible in that part of Les Nessman. He knew what he was doing every single second, every moment that he was on camera. But, everybody was funny on that show. Frank Bonner was funny in that episode. I was young and cute. [Laughs.] Everything kind of worked.
As Les Nessman narrates the unexpected demise of hundreds of ill-fated turkeys, most of the other characters â Andy, Venus, Johnny Fever, and Bailey Quarters â listen in disbelief from the booth.
HUGH WILSON: That was all shot just as you see it. They were in their set, and [Sanders] was in the swing set â thatâs a set that you donât see every week.  He was right there next to them on the stage; we didnât shoot it separately and cut it in. We did everything we could to make it work for the live audience.
MAX TASH: There were a few more extras [needed] than we had budgeted for, so our runner, Tim Womack, was one of the passersby when Les Nessman was doing the play-by-play. In the background of that shot, also, was Hughâs secretary, Lissa Levin, who eventually became a story editor and a renowned writer on her own. And there were other production people and office staff who were in that episode as background people. We were always throwing friends and family into the shots.
MICHAEL ZINBERG: You never know what you have until you get it in front of the audience. Then when the laughter started, and turned into howls when those turkeys started coming down, it was hard to keep doing the show, because we were laughing so much watching the show.
HUGH WILSON: They were cracking it up. Thereâs probably some good outs from that â I donât know where â where they just started laughing and we had to cut.
TIM REID: We just could not keep from laughing throughout the whole taping of it.
HUGH WILSON: Richard Sanders never did that. He was really amazing. He could have the whole soundstage fall and he never broke character. But the rest of them, being human . . . .   Particularly Gordon Jump, if he said something that amused him, he was sure as shit going to laugh himself.  Actually, those kind of things I enjoyed, because the audience loved to see somebody make a mistake. They felt like they were on the inside.
FRANK BONNER (âHerb Tarlekâ): My most fond memories of âTurkeys Awayâ are Richard Sandersâs (a very good actor) use of the reporterâs description of the 1937 Hindenburg disaster â [and then] ââŚthe turkeys are hitting the ground like bags of wet cement.â
HUGH WILSON: That line was mine.
Before the turkey drop, Les reads aloud the text of the banner trailing behind the helicopter â even, slowly, the stationâs call letters, as if heâd never seen them before.
HUGH WILSON: Where he had to read it? That was his gag. Iâm pretty sure that that came up in rehearsal, and Richard did that. Isnât that good? They were a funny bunch of people, all of them.
Jennifer (Loni Anderson), the stationâs receptionist, fields a call from the Humane Society: âBut, Mr. Colley, a lot of turkeys donât make it through Thanksgiving.â
HUGH WILSON: That I donât think I wrote. I think thatâs from Dial.
Finally, Arthur Carlson and Herb Tarlek return to the station, dazed and disheveled.
HUGH WILSON: I was a real grizzly about keeping to the lines. There was a great deal of respect for writers at MTM. Tinker and Mary were always right behind the writers. I guess that started with Jim Brooks being so key to her show being a success. So [the cast] stayed to the lines, but invariably they found funny things. A lot of times they would find something and I would say, âAugh! Nope, donât do that!â Then theyâd try things and Iâd go, âYeah, thatâs great. Thank you very much.â I must say I didnât write it in the script that Gordon would show up with â Frank and him had makeup put those little feathers on them. When I saw it, I fell down in laughter, so they realized I supported that.
No turkeys actually appear on-screen in âTurkeys Away.â
HUGH WILSON: No, thank God. And I sure didnât want one on the set, after Jerry said the turkeys attacked the people. He was the one that said they landed and decided theyâd let them out there so the people could grab them, but the turkeys were vicious to the people.  So I put that right in the script, too.
MAX TASH: I thought the funniest lines were happening because the audience was imagining what was happening.  You never saw turkeys thrown out â you only saw how it was being described. You saw the aftermath when Carlson comes in with feathers in his hair. So the funniest laughs were in the audienceâs imagination.
Finally, Arthur Carlson re-emerges from his office, and utters the ten lines that would immortalize âTurkeys Away.â
GARY SANDY: The famous line from that show, âAs God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly,â is famous because, at the moment â and itâs like it was yesterday, I can see it â the genius of Hugh Wilson and Gordon Jump came together. Gordon Jump was one of the nicest men that ever lived, really, he truly was, and I think his humanity, who the man was â he got by with a lot of stuff because he was just a great human being. Gordon Jump was a very religious guy, so somehow or another âas God is my witnessâ is coupled with all that.
HUGH WILSON: Yeah, I wrote that. That was from my mother. She was always using God as her witness. âAs God is my witness, I have never in my life seen a boy,â etc., etc. [I was] an only child who got caught for everything. I mean everything. I have five children, so I never really know who did what, but when youâre an only child, youâre screwed.
Jump does not utter the âAs God is my witnessâŚâ line until after the end credits have begun to appear.
MAX TASH: The thing we learned from Hugh was: you tell the joke and you get out of there. Donât be hanging around.
HUGH WILSON: At the time, the show hadnât been on the air [yet], and these were people [in the live audience] who were out vacationing, who were given these tickets at Universalâs [studio tour] and all, and they really wanted to see a show they had seen for years on TV. They werenât too happy to come in and see a show they hadnât seen yet. But that was the biggest success in terms of audience enjoyment up to that time. So we were real excited about it. So was the network. People were just pitching fits.
MAX TASH: There were so many big laughs that you do end up cutting out laughs, because youâve already established how funny the joke is, and youâve already heard the audience, and if they went on maybe twice as long with a particular laugh it just takes away from the program time.
HUGH WILSON: Thatâs the kind of problem you prayed for.
MAX TASH: So, yeah, we did [trim the laugh track], but it wasnât unusual on WKRP to do that.
Although it was meant to air the week before Thanksgiving, âTurkeys Awayâ was actually first broadcast on October 30, 1978. The ratings-challenged series spent the holidays fighting for its life.
HUGH WILSON: I think after the sixth or eighth show we were taken off the air and put on hiatus for, quote, ârepairs.â Thatâs what Variety, I believe, reported that CBS said, that they were having a second look at the show and they were âtweaking it.â
Well, in point of fact, I just sat there and waited. I didnât tweak anything. I went to some meeting where we all agreed that it should be funnier. And then I turned in some scripts that they hadnât seen, and they thought that they saw in there a reaction from me from that meeting. But theyâd been written way before that. I just changed the dates on the drafts, so it would look like they were written after we were taken off the air.
I think, in a way, âTurkeysâ saved us from getting cancelled, because it got a lot of talk. Anecdotal, around town kind of talk. Those people, of course, were ruled by necessity by Nielsens, but they also wanted to be involved with something that was thought around town to be good.
TIM REID: Today, not only could you not get away with that, nobody would get it.
HUGH WILSON: I meet people for the first time, and if we get to talking and it somehow comes up that I created WKRP, they immediately start saying, âAs God is my witness, I didnât know turkeys could fly.â Itâs rather amazing that the line itself is [legendary]. Iâm just thrilled and tickled to death by it. People either say âOh, I love that show,â or they go right to âAs God is my witnessâŚâ It seems like half and half.
GARY SANDY: Itâs not surprising to me that this has become what itâs become, because that moment was etched in my memory as being something really special.
HUGH WILSON: By the way, when I got a farm, Iâd come up on wild turkeys. They fly about two feet off the ground, and they can only go for about ten yards, but wild turkeys can fly.
Thanks to all of the participants in the above, and especially to Hugh Wilson, whose generosity in opening his rolodex made this piece possible, and to Justin Humphreys, who introduced me to Hugh. Â For more âTurkeys Awayâ stories, check out the DVD audio commentary featuring Hugh Wilson, Loni Anderson, and Frank Bonner.
Obamacareâs menu labeling regulation promises to be a disaster for the food and restaurant industries, as its implementation is both costly and extremely onerous. While its deleterious effects on the pizza, restaurant, and grocery industries have been most well known, it also has the potential to shutter an industry near and dear to Americansâ hearts: craft beer.
Since beer has a few too many calories for bureaucrats, the health law dictates that all brewers include a detailed calorie count on every type of beer produced. Failure to do so, according to Americans for Tax Reform, âmeans craft brewers will not be able to sell their beer in any restaurant chain with over 20 locations.â
The Cato Institute estimates the Obamacare calorie labeling requirements will cost a business as much as $77,000 to implement. For larger beer companies, this is a drop in the bucket, but for small, local craft brewers it represents a substantial cost that they must pay. As a result, it creates a significant disadvantage compared to larger beer companies who can better absorb the cost of this new regulation.
 According to Bart Watson, chief economist of the Brewers Association, “Most of the new [craft beer] entrants continue to be small and local, operating in neighborhoods or towns. What it means to be a brewery is shifting, back toward an era when breweries were largely local, and operated as a neighborhood bar or restaurant.” The increasingly small size of craft breweries means they are faced with a tough decision in light of the impending regulations: cut costs and possibly lay off workers to pay for the calorie labels, or be shut out of one of the most profitable markets for their product. Either way, it is a lose – lose situation for the craft beer brewers and drinkers, an industry that grew 27.8 percent from 2013 to 2014 when it was left alone.
Which is why the government has to f*ck it up.
Food and Drug Administration announced its final rule for menu labeling, a regulation thatâs already proving to be a nightmare for the major chain restaurants and retail food establishments that must comply by Dec. 1, 2015, or face a stiff penalty.
And the scorn of the self-righteous Left.
âIt got much worse in the final rule,â Lynn Liddle, chairperson of the American Pizza Community and executive VP of communications and investor relations for Dominoâs Pizza, told Townhall. âI was surprised, disappointed, and befuddled because thereâs all this new stuff in there where I go, âI donât know how weâre gonna do this.â ⌠Weâre gonna need a lot more time to untangle this mess, which I donât think is viable or workable.â
While the regulation is bad for all industries, pizza has been hit particularly hard. For one, itâs a food industry unlike any otherâ90 percent of customers get their food delivered, making the idea of in-store displays of calorie information unnecessary and costly, not to mention extremely difficult since itâs such a customizable food.
Liddle said a concession was made on labeling by the slice rather than the whole pizza, but the rule is still disastrous for small businesses across America.
â[W]hat [FDA] did in these final rules is they expanded their definition of a menu and said âweâre gonna look at it and say anything a consumer will think of at that moment as a menu,â so itâs very squishy right now because nobody really understands this thing because theyâre saying if you have a picture or a name of a product, along with a price, were gonna call that a menu, so if you take it to the ridiculous that could include television advertising, because in the restaurant industry you always have a picture of product and a price, thatâs how the restaurant industry advertises,â she explained.
âWe went to [the FDA] with a proposed solution; we didnât say âwe want to get out of it,â we said, âwe have a better wayâ ⌠and that better way was primarily doing this electronically, which by the way we already do voluntarily, so it was a really workable solution ⌠and basically theyâve ignored it,â she said.
Not on the Agenda. They are the Government so not only are they right, but they can’t have the peons making their own rules! Where is the power in that. Where is the job satisfaction.
The most ridiculous part about the entire regulation is that menu labeling has little to no effect on consumersâ purchasing choices, and studies demonstrating that menu labeling is linked to a reduction in obesity rates, the supposed benefit the FDA used to justify the regulation in the first place, doesnât exist. (Townhall)
BUT IT MAKES LIBERALS HAPPY! That’s all that matters. They are “doing something” “meaningful”. Their pride goeth before your fall. The fact that it’s worthless and will destroy businesses and jobs is totally irrelevant to their “moral” code of narcissism. They want to prove to themselves how superior they are and just how dumb you are for not being them.
So you must COMPLY.
IT’S FOR YOUR OWN GOOD!
Plus, the power trip is addicting. đ
Happy Thanksgiving. The Left hopes you enjoy this Turkey way past Thanksgiving. The Leftovers will be a bitch.
And he’s going to make it with your taxes. So the tax that’s a penalty that actually a tax is now going to raise your taxes to pay for the penalty that is a tax. Got it.
Obamacare is killing the heath insurance industry, but help for health insurers is on the way – and it will be coming out the pockets of American taxpayers via higher insurance rates and a federal bailout.
When the government says, “Explore other sources of funding” and “working with Congress on the necessary funding,” it’s time to hide your wallet and get ready to study a few more pages of tax code.
As MRCTV reported Thursday, United Healthcare lost $425 million on its policies sold via the Obamacare exchanges, and they might back out of the exchanges all together after 2016. And United Healthcare isnât alone. U.S. insurers had to absorb nearly $2.9 billion in unexpected medical expenses from their customers in Obamacare’s exchanges in 2014, according to new data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
The Milwaukee Sentinel Journal reports that some of the deficit will be made up with higher premiums, much higher premiums.
And Obama and Company will blame it on “corporate greed” not a fatally flawed partial socialized medicine designed to fail.
Many insurers have requested premium increases of 20% to 40% for next year. In August, Blue Cross Blue Shield secured approval in Tennessee for a 36.3% price hike, while Oregon OK’d a 25.6% increase for Moda Health Plan.
Even these premium increases are mild compared with what’s coming when the risk corridor provision and other stopgaps expire.
A recent University of Minnesota study found that after 2016, the cheapest plans would experience some of the most dramatic premium increases. Families who purchased “bronze” plans on the exchanges could see 45% increases. Some unlucky individuals could see their premiums shoot up 96%.
“Our data still indicate that â for at least the next decade â premiums will increase faster than they did in the years before the Affordable Care Act’s implementation,” cautioned one of the study’s authors. “Federal subsidies for ACA plans won’t be able to keep up.”
But, the federal government is going to try make the subsidies keep up. Pres. Obama’s Department of Health and Humans Services (HHS) is promising insurance companies that taxpayers will help them out.
After the United Healthcare announcement on Thursday, HHS issued a letter to insurance companies recognizing the 2014 shortfalls and declaring that the U.S. Government needs to make good:
 In the event of a shortfall for the 2016 program year, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will explore other sources of funding for risk corridors payments, subject to the availability of appropriations. This includes working with Congress on the necessary funding for outstanding risk corridors payments.Â
Risk corridors were created by the Obamacare bill.  The corridors are meant to redistribute money (sound familiar?) from insurance companies who make a bigger profit from exchange plans than expected and give to companies who lost money on the exchange plans.
Yeah, it’s called redistribution. Socialism…
The problem with the risk corridor in 2014 was that too many companies lost money – so, there wasn’t enough money to cover everyone’s losses. Â HHS is promising a bailout, or in HHS language, it will work with Congress to get more money for the risk corridors in order to cut insurance companies losses.Â
Robert Laszewski, president of consultancy Health Policy and Strategy Associates in Virginia, told CNBC:
“‘The Obamacare business model doesnât work,â âObamacare has got to be retooled.â Laszewski cited the fact that insurers overall still are losing money selling exchange plans in the second year of Obamacare, and that as a result many of them are raising prices, which could in turn lead to current and prospective customers taking a pass on further coverage.âÂ
According to Nathan Nascimento, Senior Policy Advisor for Freedom Partners:
âWe already knew that this Administration has no problem with putting special interests ahead of Americansâ health care â but yet another bailout for insurance companies on the backs of taxpayers only throws more good money after bad. Washingtonâs flawed one-size-fits-all approach to health care has failed, leading to plan cancelations, skyrocketing premium and out-of-pocket costs, and instability for American families and business. The solution is to get government out of the way â not dig the hole even deeper.”
Supporters of Obamacare are in denial. Much higher heath insurance premiums, insurance company losses needing a federal bailout, and news that almost half of the state-run Obamacare exchanges have bitten the dust, add up to one inconvenient fact: Obamacare is a failure. Â
Was never meant to be anything else.
But the supporters have no choice but to be in denial. They have wanted Socialized Medicine for 100 years and it’s failing so they have hide that from everyone, including themselves.
Sadly, it won’t be the politicians who forced the program down the American people’s throats who will be reaching into their pockets to pay for that failure.  It will be the rest of us, average American families, our children, and our grandchildren paying for this unmitigated disaster.Â
Get ready to dig deep for failure. Also, get ready for the spin that will not make it the Liberals fault.
After all, they are always right and always have the best of intentions.
Letâs start with the good news about Pew Researchâs latest findings on the incredibly annoying delicate snowflake epidemic sweeping American higher education: these people arenât the majority. Itâs not even close. Sixty-seven percent of Americans support free speech (in keeping with past polling), while 28 percent think âgovernment should be able to preventâ people from saying offensive things about minorities. Supermajorities of men, women, Democrats, Republicans, Independents, high school graduates, and college graduates all support free speech principles. Non-whites donât have supermajority support, breaking 57/38 in favor of free speech. To no oneâs surprise, Millennials are the generation where the largest proportion feels that government should curtail free speech rights (via Pew):
Four-in-ten Millennials say the government should be able to prevent people publicly making statements that are offensive to minority groups, while 58% said such speech is OK.Even though a larger share of Millennials favor allowing offensive speech against minorities, the 40% who oppose it is striking given that only around a quarter of Gen Xers (27%) and Boomers (24%) and roughly one-in-ten Silents (12%) say the government should be able to prevent such speech.
Compared with people we surveyed in dozens of nations, Americans as a whole are less likely to favor the government being able to prevent speech of any kind
I guess another silver lining (remember 40 percent is high, but itâs nowhere near a majority) is that weâre not becoming like Europe, even if Millennials in college are eating up this political correctness/safe space nonsense at the moment, which does actively seek to end discussions on certain issues.
At the same time, while itâs easy to classify all Millennials as hopeless, please watch Editor-in-Chief of DailyWire Ben Shapiro talk to Mizzou students, the ones who are rational, about the current climate on college campuses, especially the fiasco that has embroiled their institution to the point where their president and chancellor both resigned for pretty much being Caucasian. Young Americaâs Foundation hosted the event.
Katie added that Shapiro made clear that he doesnât care about your feelings, and that students need to stop whining and grow up.
In light of the recent and absurd calls from University of Missouri students to self-segregate based on race, demands for “safe spaces,” the attempts to boot reporters from covering public protests, claims of a poop swastika and more, Young America’s Foundation decided to send Harvard Law Graduate and Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro to Mizzou to debunk false, progressive narratives swirling on campus and being promoted through national media.
The words “toughen up spoiled children” were written in chalk outside of the hall where he spoke and during his speech, Shapiro took protesters and the leftists who support them to task in epic fashion. The title of his lecture was, “Truth is a Microaggression.”
“I don’t care about your feelings. Lets make something perfectly clear, I care nothing about your feelings,” Shapiro said.
Syrian refugees pose no more of a threat than tourists wanting to visit the Lincoln Memorial or go to the top of the Empire State Building, claims President Obama. Speaking to reporters with his usual impatience, Obama said Republicans are ginning up unsubstantiated fear when it comes to our new neighbors.
Speaking to reporters at a summit in the Philippines, Mr. Obama said the âoverwhelming numbersâ of Syrians who are applying for entry to the U.S. âare children, women, families â themselves victims of terrorism.â He said they are already subject to rigorous vetting by U.S. security officials.
(which isn’t strictly true, but since when did this guy care about facts!)
âThe idea that somehow they pose a more significant threat than all the tourists who pour into the United States every single day just doesnât jive with reality,â Mr. Obama said. âSo my expectation is after the initial spasm of rhetoric, the people will settle down, take a look at the facts, and weâll be able to proceed.â
Facts? Obama. Sorry Not compatible.
In other words, the president thinks refugees are simply coming here to sightsee. Recent incidents prove otherwise. Americans’ fear that some of the immigrants are secret terrorists was somewhat confirmed now that more than one terror suspect in last weekendâs attack in Paris reportedly entered Europe by posing as a Syrian refugee.
Tourist Visas is one of the biggest reasons for Illegal Aliens also, by the way.
Thankfully, our leaders arenât so naĂŻve.
But they are “racists” and “islamophobic”. đ
A total of 34 states are now rejecting the White Houseâs refugee plan, which aims to bring in 100,000 refugees by 2017, choosing to place their citizensâ safety first.
As the influx of refugees into Europe continues, the continent can expect more than a rise in tourism revenue. For leaders like Viktor Orban, the president of Hungary, he predicts a much more dangerous outcome.
“For us today, what is at stake is Europe, the lifestyle of European citizens, European values, the survival or disappearance of European nations, and more precisely formulated, their transformation beyond recognition.
âToday, the question is not merely in what kind of a Europe we would like to live, but whether everything we understand as Europe will exist at all.”
Tourists come to visit, take in the sights, then return home with their pictures and souvenirs. Refugees, on the other hand, are here to stay. People like Gov. Mike Huckabee worry about the influx, considering the refugees donât understand our language or our culture. He suggested offering them safe havens, just not in the United States.
Meanwhile, Congress has introduced legislation that would halt the refugee program until a better vetting process can be established.
Obama has threatened to veto it.
Of course he will. The Narrative is The Narrative and you aren’t allowed to disagree with it.
President Obama repeatedly promised that his signature health law, the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, would reduce insurance premiums by $2,500 for the typical family.
ObamaCare: United Healthcare’s surprise warning that it may scrap participation in federal health care exchanges is more than bad news for consumer choice. It’s a broader sign of an unsustainable system.
The nation’s largest health insurance provider surprised the markets Thursday by saying losses from its 550,000 individual ObamaCare exchange enrollments were sharply cutting its bottom line. That’s notable because ObamaCare exchange participation only forms a small slice of the $105 billion company by market capitalization.
Yet it was enough to make the giant company and all the value it creates throughout its many operations suffer enough to trigger, as IBD market reporter Jed Graham wrote, “a surge of red ink.”
The company forecast $425 million less revenue in the fourth quarter and cut its full-year 2015 earnings-per-share forecast to $6 from $6.25-$6.35.
Not surprisingly, its stock fell 5.6% by the close of trading Thursday, and other health care and hospital companies such as Aetna, Anthem, Tenet, Cigna, Humana and HCA took similar hits.
“We see no data pointing to improvement,” UnitedHealth Group CEO Stephen Helmsley said on a conference call. Patients, he explained, were using their plans more than the company had anticipated and, worse still, were dropping coverage when they got well.
Bad as that is for company profits, it’s a predictable outcome given the structure of the law and what it permits.
What Helmsley described was a company caught up in the classic “death spiral” that IBD and reputable economists have been warning about: Insurance policy sales going in the main to the sickest patients who use the most health care services, while the high prices of the larded-up government-mandated packages continue to drive off younger, healthier consumers.
DOH! It’s not like it was predictable or anything… đ
In short, the ObamaCare master plan of having young and healthy consumers subsidize the oldest, sickest patients isn’t working as the White House’s central planners and self-proclaimed experts claimed.
<<chuckle>>
Not that the ideologically rigid Obama and The Democrats will care. They will continue to hammer on it until you give in to government control of who lives and who dies and the Insurance companies go bankrupt leaving only the government left.
That’s Democrat “compassion” for ya… đ
What’s striking here is that UnitedHealth is no tiny startup ship with a narrow margin of error riding the big ObamaCare regulatory waves. It’s the biggest of the big, a conglomerate that’s the product of the consolidation of the industry â Anthem and Cigna, UnitedHealth and HCA, HCA and private investors â that was supposed to enable the sector to absorb the blow of higher costs of insuring more customers and still continue to do well.
That’s not happening.
What’s more, UnitedHealth was in the ObamaCare exchanges for only a year, during a window of time when the government was supposed to cushion insurers against losses in the ObamaCare transition. The cushion ends next year, leaving companies on their own.
(Insert “Jaws” theme music here) đ
Will smaller health care companies really be able to make a profit in an atmosphere that even UnitedHealth found impossible to sustain a profit in? There’s plenty of reason to wonder, as the markets did Thursday. (IBD)
“We cannot sustain these losses,” CEO Stephen Hemsley said in an investor call Thursday morning. “We can’t really subsidize a marketplace that doesn’t appear at the moment to be sustaining itself.”
Several nonprofit insurance cooperatives that were supposed to compete for customers on the exchanges have folded. Meanwhile, some big publicly traded insurance companies, including Anthem, Aetna, Cigna and Humana, say they are enrolling fewer people than expected or even losing money.
A recent report by McKinsey & Co. found that the industry lost a total of $2.5 billion, or $163 per customer, in the individual market.
Insurance companies have had trouble attracting healthy customers to the exchanges to purchase their insurance products, many of which have deductibles of thousands of dollars.
The industry’s troubles are reflected in the insurance products being offered on the exchanges during the current enrollment period, reports The Wall Street Journal:
“For these plans, which will take effect in 2016, many insurers have raised premiums in order to cover the medical costs of enrollees, which have run higher than many companies originally projected, fueling this year’s losses. Insurers have also shifted to offering more limited choices of health-care providers”
Still, no other big insurer has signaled its intention to leave the exchanges. (NPR)
YET. But it will come. But don’t worry Obama and The Democrats are from the Government and they are here to help you! đ
The average premium for medium-benefit plans offered to 40-year-old non-smokers will rise 10.1% in 2016, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
They canât be this dumb, can they? They just canât be.
Yes. Because reality is not something a Liberal understands. They understand the reality of their ideology and that’s it.
Actual reality is unknown to them, or refused because it doesn’t fit.
Our progressives Democratic friends arenât that stupid, right? But they are counting on the American people being stupid when it comes to world affairs. And thereâs very little to suggest they wonât be successful in that endeavor.
Yeah, because the average american is now been made to be a moron, suckling at the teat of the Liberal Media pig.
Be it the president saying ISIS is âcontainedâ hours before the group unleashed evil on the streets of Paris, or the secretary of state saying the Paris attacks were crazy, unlike the attack on the offices of Charlie Hebdo, where there was âlegitimacyâ and a ârationaleâ to them, nothing they say can be taken as serious thought.
The media did show some irritation with the president this week, but he pushed right back. Barack Obama showed an anger and frustration toward the press daring to question his wisdom in Turkey he normally reserves for Republicans. Repeatedly chastising reporters for asking him what he deemed similar questions, the president committed to staying on the same path that brought us to the point where dozens were dead in France and the West is on high alert.
Thereâs something to be said for commitment, I guess. Itâd be better in other aspects of his life, but at least the concept isnât completely foreign to him.
Â
After damning the torpedoes and ordering the engines ahead full steam, the president then set about working on his main concern â climate change. Yes, what computer models that canât accurately predict the past say will happen in 100 years is the major focus of this government in a time of mass slaughter.
Legacy, it would seem, is every bit as addictive as heroin.
Ideology is reality. Reality is ideology.
But the administration can make that pivot because it can count on the media, no matter how poorly theyâre treated, to be the Ginger Rogers to its Fred Astaire â they go where theyâre led, happily.
The Ministry of Truth is consistent. Consistently Progressive, regardless.
As Hillary Clinton said in the debate no one watched (seriously, is the next âprotect Hillary from anyone seeing her be a crazy leftistâ debate on the Friday Star Wars opens? Might as well be), we are at war with âviolent extremists.â
Dems have debates no one is SUPPOSED to watch. It messes with message. But they can say they had them and they can feed their core base of radical Progressives some meat.
“violent extremists”= Republicans? đ
No one questioned what type of extremists she was talking about because everyone knew it. Sheâs not talking about violent Black Lives Matters extremists or campus crybaby extremists, sheâs talking about Islamic extremists. She just wonât say it. Is there any reason to believe sheâd actually fight it?
Weâll never know because sheâll never be asked in any way that will require a serious answer.
While Democrats implode, the media plays guard dog.
And the average moron is none the wiser. And they get to vote in less than a year. Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid.
Just one example is the Huffington Post. Itâs an ultra-leftwing blog with media credentials, but many people actually believe what they read there.
In a piece by someone they bill as a âreporter,â the Huffington Post declares âThe West Is Giving ISIS Exactly What It Wants.â The sub-headlines are equally as journalistic, âUnfortunately, conservatives in the U.S. and Europe seem to want to do all the wrong things.â
Narrative, baby, it’s all about the Narrative.
Again, this is a ânewsâ piece written by a âreporter,â not a column on the opinion pages.
The argument, if you can call it that, is threefold and is described as being embraced by âpolicymakers,â though each section cites only one liberal of dubious credentials.
First, keeping refugees in the Middle East increases the prospect that theyâll be radicalized. âJosh Hampson argues in The Hill that keeping Syrian refugees in the Middle Eastern countries where they are currently concentrated increases the probability that they will grow susceptible to radicalization.â Hampson, according to his byline, is âa research associate at the Niskanen Center where he focuses on defense reform and foreign policy.â Well, if thereâs a greater authority on the issue Iâve never heard of him.
Â
Hampsonâs theory is that these people are so fragile that proximity to terrorists increases the likelihood theyâll decide to join a death cult. Are those who we really want in this country? People who are essentially a coin flip away from terrorism? Theyâre not exactly walking into a thriving economy where jobs await them.
Two federal agents operating under the umbrella of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are claiming that eight Syrian illegal aliens attempted to enter Texas from Mexico in the Laredo Sector.
Second, reacting to terrorism negatively runs the risk of creating more terrorists, particularly American Muslims. Yes, itâs that stupid. âOne of the goals of attacks like the one in Paris is to provoke an overreaction that will make some Muslims in the West feel that Islam is inherently irreconcilable with the culture of the countries they live in.â In short, be careful to how you react after being punched in the face because more people will want to punch you in the face.
Is Sharia compatabile with Western Values, esp. The Constitution?
Nope.
Just a simple fact. A little Truth. That’s all
By âoverreactionâ the implication is clear â take your medicine, pretend it didnât happen or else it will happen again. Itâs battered woman syndrome on a national scale and itâs presented as fact in a ânewsâ story.
ISLAMOPHOBIA!
Third, by refusing refugees, the West is aiding ISIS because they donât want Muslims to leave the region as it makes them look bad. But ISIS knows who is leaving and from where and could stop some if not most of them if it desired. But theyâre not.
If you had a gum ball machine where 10% (or even 1%) of the gumballs in the machine were lethal would you let your kids use it until it was cleared or is that an “overreaction”?
The expert cited in this section, who is irrelevant here, âgoes on to cite a dozen statements from Islamic State leaders warning refugees against heading to Europe or other âinfidelâ lands.â A dozen statements from a terrorist organization not exactly known as a paragon of truth and virtue, thatâs âproof.â
Hope a You Tube video. Liberals are good at blaming those…
This ânewsâ piece, which is just one of many, concludes, almost miraculously, exactly how the Democratic Party wants it to â âif Europe and the United States were to shut out Syrian refugees, they would be foregoing an advantage they have over the Islamic State group.â
Weird how that just so happens to dovetail perfectly with what the president is demanding, isnât it?
DOH!
Other arguments from other âjournalistsâ are just as flimsy, but because theyâre reported by news outlets they will find legs with the uninformed.
Stupid People, got no reason… đ
Whatâs difficult to understand is why any of these people care so deeply that theyâd make fools of themselves to advance the agenda of a lame-duck president whoâs never shown them particular favor or loyalty. They couldnât possibly believe what they say, could they?
đ
Do they really believe otherwise well-adjusted people decided to commit their lives to murder because they heard about a small prison on a tropical island? That they were normal people interested in hanging out with their friends until Gitmo was explained to them?
Yes.
Might I suggest that if someone was turned to murder by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed having water poured up his nose they were going to murder no matter what.
No, because that’s islamophobia.
Still, this makes sense to our liberal friends. They have sympathy for the unstable person out there. Theyâd rather those people bring their instability to this country for reasons that make sense only if you know how Democrats work.
Their “compassion” shall be there undoing because it’s mixed with their unreality and their ideology and thus they are impenetrable to actual reality and you’re the problem for pointing it out to them.
People are their race, their gender, their sexual preference, anything but individuals to Democrats. Not since the defeat of the Axis Powers has the world seen more earnest and insistent propagandists. Itâs a family tradition, if you will, on the left.
The real question is why our progressives friends want to bring ethnic and religious minorities to a country with racism in its DNA, were its campuses are overrun with racists keeping minority students oppressed, where the very system is stacked against them because of who they are. Why bring them here?
To be “victims” and vote for Democrats. And to make Democrats “feel good” about themselves and “morally” superior.
The answer is they either hate them or they know everything they stand for and claim as justification for it is a lie. Since they view individuals as disposable, logically it could be both. But thereâs nothing logical about liberals. The simplest answer is always the right answer, and the worst, when it comes to our opponents: Itâs âAgenda Ăber Alles.â
In a call with senior Obama administration officials Tuesday evening, several governors demanded they be given access to information about Syrian refugees about to be resettled by the federal government in their states. Top White House officials refused.
The Agenda is The Agenda. You are not allowed to change that.
It’s not like Obama cares if you disagree with his Agenda.
It’s on a need to know basis, and since you are not of “the body” you don’t need to know.
Over a dozen governors from both parties joined the conference call, which was initiated by the White House after 27 governors vowed not to cooperate with further resettlement of Syrian refugees in their states. The outrage among governors came after European officials revealed that one of the Paris attackers may have entered Europe in October through the refugee process using a fake Syrian passport. (The details of the attacker’s travels are still murky.)
The administration officials on the call included White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, State Department official Simon Henshaw, FBI official John Giacalone, and the deputy director of the National Counterterrorism Center John Mulligan.
On the call several Republican governors and two Democrats — New Hampshireâs Maggie Hassan and Californiaâs Jerry Brown — repeatedly pressed administration officials to share more information about Syrian refugees entering the United States. The governors wanted notifications whenever refugees were resettled in their states, as well as access to classified information collected when the refugees were vetted.
âThere was a real sense of frustration from all the governors that there is just a complete lack of transparency and communication coming from the federal government,â said one GOP state official who was on the call.
The administration officials, led by McDonough, assured the governors that the vetting process was thorough and that the risks of admitting Syrian refugees could be properly managed. He added that the federal government saw no reason to alter the current method of processing refugees.
President Barack Obama lashed out Wednesday at Republicans who insist on barring Syrian refugees from entering the U.S., deeming their words offensive and insisting “it needs to stop.”
“Apparently they’re scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America,” Obama said.
Mocking GOP leaders for thinking they’re tough, Obama said overblown rhetoric from Republicans could be a potent recruitment tool for the Islamic State group. He insisted the U.S. process for screening refugees for possible entry into the U.S. is rigorous and said the U.S. doesn’t make good decisions “based on hysteria” or exaggerated risk.
“We are not well served when in response to a terrorist attack we descend into fear and panic,” the president said. (Townhall)
The Agenda is The Agenda. My Reality is the one one. Anything else is just stupid and not worth my time. So shut the f*ck up and do as you’re told!!
Florida governor Rick Scott asked McDonough point blank if states could opt out of accepting refugees from Syria. McDonough said no, the GOP state official said.
In a readout of the call Tuesday night, the White House said that several governors “expressed their appreciation for the opportunity to better understand the process and have their issues addressed.” The White House noted that “others encouraged further communication” from the administration about the resettlement of refugees.Â
In other words, they can go fuck themselves. I’m going to do it anyways.
“I understand why Americans have been particularly affected,” he said.
I just don’t care.
Hassan, one of two Democrats to challenge the administration on the call, had already come out in favor of halting the flow of Syrian refugees to the United States. She expressed anger that state officials aren’t notified when Syrian refugees are resettled in their territory.
Brown said he favored continuing to admit Syrian refugees but wanted the federal government to hand over information that would allow states to keep track of them, the GOP state official said.
McDonough responded to Brown that there was currently no process in place to give states such information and the administration saw no reason to change the status quo. The non-governmental organizations that help resettle the refugees would have such information.
Brown countered by noting that state law enforcement agencies have active investigations into suspected radicals and that information about incoming Syrian refugees could help maintain their awareness about potential radicalization. He suggested the U.S. had to adjust the way it operates in light of the Paris attacks.
McDonough reiterated his confidence in the current process. While promising to consider what Brown and other senators had said, he emphasized that the administration had no plans to increase information sharing on refugees with states as of now.
Top GOP senators echoed the concerns of governors Tuesday. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr joined House Speaker Paul Ryanâs call for a âpauseâ in the flow of Syrian refugees, which is intended to include 10,000 people by 2016. McConnell said “the ability to vet people coming from that part of the world is really quite limited.”
Democratic senators are split on the issue. Senators Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein said Tuesday there may be a need for a pause in accepting Syrian refugees but they both wanted to hear more from the administration about the issue. Sen. Dick Durbin said that refugees arenât the primary source of concern. He pointed to the millions of foreign visitors who enter America each year.
âBackground checks need to be redoubled in terms of refugees but if weâre talking about threats to the United States, letâs put this in perspective,â he said. âLet us not just single out the refugees as the potential source of danger in the United States.â
The White House is trying hard to engage governors and lawmakers. Top administration officials held several briefings about the issue Tuesday on Capitol Hill. But if they donât agree to share more with state and local politicians, the opposition to accepting Syrian refugees could quickly gain ground. (Bloomberg)
And your King’s petulance will grow louder.
30 states now refuse to accept #SyrianRefugees after #ParisAttacks but State Dept. says they may have no choice.
Fundamentally, the biggest problem is that no one trusts Obama and his “Vetting process” because it’s entirely politically and ideologically driven and he doesn’t actually care what you think.
Now, 25 Republican governors â and one Democrat too â have said they don’t want Syrian refugees in their states, as President Obama recommitted the U.S. to take a portion of this population fleeing from ISIS.
Military age males…unable to vet properly (according to FBI and Intelligence agencies) from the country is the #1 sponsor and producer of terrorists in the world and one of the Paris Terrorists was a “refugee”. I don’t understand the reason for them to be cautious. đ
‘It is very important,’ Obama said. ‘That we do not close our hearts to these victims of such violence and somehow start equating the issue of refugees with the issue of terrorism.’Â
Yeah, don’t equate my Agenda with fighting terrorism. đ
Oh, and the Leftist yesterday were also going all “Supremacy Clause” on me so you know it’s about the Agenda and The Narrative and not about national security. It’s pure partisan politics.
You will do as your King commands or else!
The problem for Jindal, Abbott and the other governors opposed to admitting refugees, however, is that there is no lawful means that permits a state government to dictate immigration policy to the president in this way. As the Supreme Court explained in Hines v. Davidowitz, âthe supremacy of the national power in the general field of foreign affairs, including power over immigration, naturalization and deportation, is made clear by the Constitution.â States do not get to overrule the federal government on matters such as this one.
This power to admit refugees fits within the scheme of âbroad discretion exercised by immigration officialsâ that the Supreme Court recognized in its most recent major immigration case, Arizona v. United States. (Think Progress)
So you KNOW it’s just partisan politics. You might remember this one. It;s where the State of Arizona decided that since the Feds were not enforcing Federal Law, that they would and Obama and Holder slap them down basically saying if the they want to ignore the border they can.
Mind you, the Left also says the refugees and illegal immigration are two different issues, but they combine them anyways when it’s about their politics and their Agenda.
So you know it’s all politics.
‘If there were a group of radical Christians pledging to murder anyone who had a different religious view than they, we would have a different national security situation,’ Cruz said, who criticized the Obama administration for ‘pretend[ing] as if there is no religious aspect to this.’
Could be because he’s partial to Muslims over Christians. đ
But i’m just being “Islamophobic”, “heartless” and “aprtisan” right? It’s because Barack is black right? đ
And you know the Left is in full manipulation mode when they start quoting The Devil Himself, The Great Satan, George W. Bush…
The Democratic president said he had a lot of disagreement with Bush on policy.Â
‘But I was very proud after 9/11 when he was adamant and clear about the fact that this is not a war on Islam,’ Obama said. ‘And the notion that some of those who’ve taken on leadership in his party would ignore all of that â that’s not who we are.’Â
The president called on Americans to follow Bush’s example. (UK guardian)
So you know it’s an Agenda policy item and nothing else.
You are being manipulated.
European parliamentarians were warned of the âreal and genuine threatâ of the Islamic State putting 500,000 Islamic extremists in April this year. The British politician, Nigel Farage MEP, warned the EU its immigration policy placed a âdirect threat to our civilisationâ.
Mr Farage told a meeting of the European Parliament in French city of Strasbourg: âThere is a real and genuine threat. When Isis say they want to flood our continent with half a million Islamic extremists, they mean it.
âThere is nothing in this document that will stop those people from coming. Indeed I fear we face a direct threat to our civilisation if we allow large numbers of people from that war-torn region into Europe.
âIt is ironic that nine days before a British General Mr Cameron and Mr Miliband are not engaged in this debate, and in fact the UK can do nothing. We are impotent, we have surrendered our ability to get involved (with stopping the immigrants).â
Despite Farage’s warning the EU continued to push ahead with its plan to force each EU country to take a percentage of the refugees. This left countries unable to secure their borders, and the Schengen Agreement meant most EU countries have dropped their passport controls. Only the UK and Ireland have a permanent exception from Schengen and are therefore allowed to keep passport controls.
Following news the French would treble their military presence against the Islamic State the UK admitted it had foiled seven major attacks recently. Islamic affairs expert, Alan Mendoza, said: “It is essential that Western nations now rethink their military strategy towards Islamic State. We have fought ?a phoney war to date and it has led to real casualties on European soil.
âWe now need to redouble our efforts to expunge this scourge from the territory it holds. In Britain’s case, this will mean committing to military action in Syria, or risk becoming an international also-ran in terms of our influence.”
At tonight’s Mansion House speech in the City of London the Prime Minister, David Cameron, once again justified the British approach to dealing with the Jihadis. He said: âThe more we learn about what happened in Paris the more it justifies the approach that we are taking in Britain.
âWhen you are dealing with radicalized European Muslims, linked to ISIL in Syria and inspired by a poisonous narrative of extremism, you need an approach that covers the full spectrum – military power, counter-terrorism expertise and defeating the poisonous narrative that is the root cause of this evil.â
His speech did not make any pledge to protect the UK from mass immigration, despite the public anger about it. However he had already pledged a ‘shoot to kill’ policy for terrorists in Britain, something that was immediately condemned by the leader of the UK Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn.
A petition demanding to shut the UK border to Syrian refugees has now reached 410,000. It is unlikely to be acted upon. (Townhall)
So do you want to be next? Is the risk of being “islamophobic” higher than the risk of MORE terrorists getting into the country?
Hereâs a question Iâd like to put to the doe-eyed, Co-Exist, âpoor Syrian/Muslim refugeeâ French folks and other easily deceived dupes who slurped down that politically correct bouillabaisse of one-hundred-percent, uncut, irrational, will/has never turned out well bullshit: Howâd that kum-ba-yah, multi-culti mindset work out for you?
Not so well, eh?
Oui?
Oui.
Garsh, whoâd a thunk that evil ISIS operatives, with mass murderous wet-dreams, would try to scam their way into France under the guise of being persecuted, California-Dreaminâ, nanny-goat-bearded good guys?
Iâll tell you who wouldâve âthunkâ it: pretty much everyone with a lick of common sense, thatâs who.
Helen Keller couldâve have seen that one coming.
Dear God, some of you are slow on the uptick. Please forgive them, Lord.
Now, for those of you who bought the altruistic bovine scatology regarding the Hello-Kitty refugees, please go find a sledge-hammer and hit yourself in the face with it for aiding and abetting this atrocity.
AMEN!
In addition, after crashing your mug, go down to the nearest cafe ⌠order a triple espresso ⌠down it after it cools and then ⌠please ⌠wake the hashtag up because your We-Are-The-World acid trip is getting people needlessly slaughtered.
But the Truth is too much for them, you know. Not to mention their Thought Police Political Correctness Filters are on overload trying to deal with the contradictions.
They are in full PB boat motor mode…But…But….But…But…But…But…But….But…But…
“These attackers do not follow the beliefs of any religion. The ideology of terrorists is hate.”
Funny, you don’t say that about Christians and Gays… đ
“Whoever kills an innocent person, it is as though he has killed all of mankind,” tweeted London-based journalist Shehnaz Khan on Friday, quoting the Quran. Khan also included two hashtag with that messages: #TerrorismHasNoReligion and #NotInMyName. (HP)
Ah, isn’t that cute. Funny, the Islamic Terrorists have a different interpretation of The Quran.
Wake the #hashtag up, you social media obsessed twonks!
Funny, how this ONLY comes up when discussing Muslim Terrorists and Muslim Terrorist attacks.
It’s “islamophobia” you know.
Dear Muslims, you don’t have to apologize – we know, that terror has no religion and we still love you. #ParisAttacks#MuslimApologies
Yes, I said it. Your political correctness opened the door, and thereby helped cause, this Parisian catastrophe with your oh-so-trendy, big-hearted and empty-headed belief that: âif we embrace Islam then theyâll chill out and play parcheesi with us.â
And Obama and Hillary are still at it. But that’s what you get with hardline Ideologues. They are incapable of thinking outside of their ideology and there agenda.
Well, you were dead wrong ⌠again. Operative word: dead.
Much like those You Tubers from Benghazi.
This is what political correctness has yielded up, namely: nations full of retards led by leaders that think theyâre morally superior by embracing their own death.
Hereâs reality, folks: Islam makes things suck everywhere it goes.
Just like Liberalism, Socialism and Communism. đ
For instance: They hate our freedoms, our Constitution, our customs, our flag, our various religions, our atheists, our women, the gays; theyâd stone Bruce Jenner, they despise our music, they donât like bacon or bikinis and, truth be told, theyâd love nothing more than to take over Western Civilization and make it bow in submission to the dictates of a 7th century pedophile who heard voices. Thatâs Islam in a nutshell. They radically and fundamentally hate us. So ⌠if what I just described sounds peachy with you, and for your posterity, then inject some Muslims into your national mix and give it about 30-40 years to simmer.
They don’t want to assimilate. And the #blacklivesmatter and University Idiocy crowd are perfectly happen with that. So when they start demanding Sharia Law are you going to cave in faster than that Latte with triple mocha?
Oh, and for those still playing Ring-Around-The-Rosie and blathering about how the âmoderate Muslimsâ are mondo-jovial peeps, please note⌠weâre not hearing too much from them condemning the massacre in Paris;
No the idiot on Facebook yesterday that said the 80-100,000 radicals is nothing compared to the 1.6 million (or was it billion) Muslim so lay off the “islamophobia”.
Then there’s this moron:
So stop with the “hate”. đ
Are you that much of a Moron!?
An army with 80,000 people in it will crush your little idiot brain in a second!
or their calling for European or American leaders to lock down our respective borders because there are tens-of-thousands of crazy SOBs amongst the âpoor refugees.â
Remember that Border Security thing you still call “racist”??
I think Europe and the USA should follow Japanâs lead and make our countries insanely hard to get into.
đ
Lastly, hereâs my prediction regarding the French: I bet they, starting with Hollande, curl back up into the fetal position. I bet they go back into PC mode with Muslims. And I bet our leaders, especially on the Left, do so as well.
Yep. They don’t call them cheese eating surrender monkeys for nothing. This will not toughen them up in the long run.
They will soon blind themselves to their security in the name of liberal ideology.
Now, just two days afterISIS carried out the worst terror attack in France since World War II, the Obama administration has transferred five more detainees to the United Arab Emirates.
Translation: released to kill more Westerners.
Yep, I bet we blind ourselves all over again to Islam being an implacable enemy inside our borders; and that we will not truly wake up until⌠God forbid⌠Islam smacks the West so hard, killing way more than they did on 9/11, that finally our fairy tale about Islam being yummy will simply not cotton with reality.
But I don’t think even that will do it. The Force of Unreal PC Thought Control is strong with these morons.
The Left avoid The Truth, and truth, with a vigor not seen in centuries. Admitting that there “enlightened” vision of the work is a naive load of old crap is impossible for them to comprehend.
Liberal/Progressives are to be judged only by their INTENTIONS, not by their RESULTS!
Anything else is just “hate”, “political”, or “racist”.
Hopefully, when that happens, we’ll have leaders with a steel will who will plow through the residual cruel remains of political correctness and give Islam the apocalypse it says it wants.
And needs…
But I fear millions could die first, in the name “tolerance” and “diversity”.
But no liberal will take responsibility for it either because it’s so far outside of their mental capacity to do so.
To the delight of the crowd, all of the candidates in Saturday night’s debate positioned themselves as aggressively pro-immigrant and drew a sharp contrast between their outlook and that of the Republicans.
âThe fact of the matter is — and letâs say it in our debate because you will never hear it from that immigrant-bashing carnival barker Donald Trump — the truth of the matter is net immigration from Mexico last year was zero,â former Maryland Gov. Martin OâMalley said in response to weighing immigration reform against the need for border security.
He’s never going to be the nominee, but he has the same sentiment as Hillary and Bernie.
Clinton added that she has reviewed Obama’s executive action and is convinced “that the president has the authority that he attempted to exercise with respect to Dreamers and their parents.”
Net Zero Gain: The number of families illegally crossing the southern U.S. border has more than doubled over the same period last fall, prompting concern about a new surge of migrants from Central America.
Many more unaccompanied children are also crossing, with 4,476 apprehended in September â an 85% increase over that month in 2014, according to new Border Patrol data.
“If that trend even continues a little bit, if things start to go up in February as they usually do, we could be looking at things getting really high, and by spring, you’re seeing an emergency,” said Adam Isacson, a senior associate at the Washington Office on Latin America, a human rights advocacy group.
As I write, Paris is under curfew for the first time since the German occupation, and the death toll from the multiple attacks stands at 158, the vast majority of them slaughtered during a concert at the Bataclan theatre, a delightful bit of 19th century Chinoiserie on the boulevard Voltaire. The last time I was there, if memory serves, was to see Julie Pietri. I’m so bloody sick of these savages shooting and bombing and killing and blowing up everything I like – whether it’s the small Quebec town where my little girl’s favorite fondue restaurant is or my favorite hotel in Amman or the brave freespeecher who hosted me in Copenhagen …or a music hall where I liked to go to hear a little jazz and pop and get away from the cares of the world for a couple of hours. But look at the photographs from Paris: there’s nowhere to get away from it; the barbarians who yell “Allahu Akbar!” are there waiting for you …when you go to a soccer match, you go to a concert, you go for a drink on a Friday night. They’re there on the train… at the magazine office… in the Kosher supermarket… at the museum in Brussels… outside the barracks in Woolwich…
This is what we’re going to be talking about when the mullahs nuke us.
Almost. When the Allahu Akbar boys opened fire, Paris was talking about the climate-change conference due to start later this month, when the world’s leaders will fly in to “solve” a “problem” that doesn’t exist rather than to address the one that does. But don’t worry: we already have a hashtag (#PrayForParis) and doubtless there’ll be another candlelight vigil of weepy tilty-headed wankers. Because as long as we all advertise how sad and sorrowful we are, who needs to do anything?
With his usual killer comedy timing, the “leader of the free world” told George Stephanopoulos on “Good Morning, America” this very morning that he’d “contained” ISIS and that they’re not “gaining strength”. A few hours later, a cell whose members claim to have been recruited by ISIS slaughtered over 150 people in the heart of Paris and succeeded in getting two suicide bombers and a third bomb to within a few yards of the French president.
Visiting the Bataclan, M Hollande declared that “nous allons mener le combat, il sera impitoyable”: We are going to wage a war that will be pitiless.
Does he mean it? Or is he just killing time until Obama and Cameron and Merkel and Justin Trudeau and Malcolm Turnbull fly in and they can all get back to talking about sea levels in the Maldives in the 22nd century? By which time France and Germany and Belgium and Austria and the Netherlands will have been long washed away.
Among his other coy evasions, President Obama described tonight’s events as “an attack not just on Paris, it’s an attack not just on the people of France, but this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values we share”.
But that’s not true, is it? He’s right that it’s an attack not just on Paris or France. What it is is an attack on the west, on the civilization that built the modern world – an attack on one portion of “humanity” by those who claim to speak for another portion of “humanity”. And these are not “universal values” but values that spring from a relatively narrow segment of humanity. They were kinda sorta “universal” when the great powers were willing to enforce them around the world and the colonial subjects of ramshackle backwaters such as Aden, Sudan and the North-West Frontier Province were at least obliged to pay lip service to them. But the European empires retreated from the world, and those “universal values” are utterly alien to large parts of the map today.
And then Europe decided to invite millions of Muslims to settle in their countries. Most of those people don’t want to participate actively in bringing about the death of diners and concertgoers and soccer fans, but at a certain level most of them either wish or are indifferent to the death of the societies in which they live – modern, pluralist, western societies and those “universal values” of which Barack Obama bleats. So, if you are either an active ISIS recruit or just a guy who’s been fired up by social media, you have a very large comfort zone in which to swim, and which the authorities find almost impossible to penetrate.
And all Chancellor Merkel and the EU want to do is make that large comfort zone even larger by letting millions more “Syrian” “refugees” walk into the Continent and settle wherever they want. As I wrote after the Copenhagen attacks in February:
I would like to ask Mr Cameron and Miss Thorning-Schmidt what’s their happy ending here? What’s their roadmap for fewer “acts of violence” in the years ahead? Or are they riding on a wing and a prayer that they can manage the situation and hold it down to what cynical British civil servants used to call during the Irish “Troubles” “an acceptable level of violence”? In Pakistan and Nigeria, the citizenry are expected to live with the reality that every so often Boko Haram will kick open the door of the schoolhouse and kidnap your daughters for sex-slavery or the Taliban will gun down your kids and behead their teacher in front of the class. And it’s all entirely “random”, as President Obama would say, so you just have to put up with it once in a while, and it’s tough if it’s your kid, but that’s just the way it is. If we’re being honest here, isn’t that all Mr Cameron and Miss Thorning-Schmidt are offering their citizens? Spasms of violence as a routine feature of life, but don’t worry, we’ll do our best to contain it – and you can help mitigate it by not going to “controversial” art events, or synagogues, or gay bars, or…
…or soccer matches, or concerts, or restaurants…
To repeat what I said a few days ago, I’m Islamed out. I’m tired of Islam 24/7, at Colorado colleges, Marseilles synagogues, Sydney coffee shops, day after day after day. The west cannot win this thing with a schizophrenic strategy of targeting things and people but not targeting the ideology, of intervening ineffectually overseas and not intervening at all when it comes to the remorseless Islamization and self-segregation of large segments of their own countries.
So I say again: What’s the happy ending here? Because if M Hollande isn’t prepared to end mass Muslim immigration to France and Europe, then his “pitiless war” isn’t serious. And, if they’re still willing to tolerate Mutti Merkel’s mad plan to reverse Germany’s demographic death spiral through fast-track Islamization, then Europeans aren’t serious. In the end, the decadence of Merkel, Hollande, Cameron and the rest of the fin de civilisation western leadership will cost you your world and everything you love.
Stephanopoulos asked Obama if ISIS was gaining in strength, to which Obama denied they were.
âI donât think theyâre gaining strength,â Obama responded. âWhat is true is that from the start, our goal has been first to contain and we have contained them. They have not gained ground in Iraq, and in Syria theyâll come in, theyâll leave, but you donât see this systemic march by ISIL across the terrain.â
âWhat we have not yet been able to do is to completely decapitate their command and control structures,â he admitted. âWeâve made some progress in trying to reduce the flow of foreign fighters and part our goal has to be to recruit more effective Sunni partners in Iraq to really go on offense rather than simply engage in defense.â
This is the shocking moment terrified concert-goers dragged their dying friends along a street and desperately clung to window ledges while fleeing the Paris massacre which has left at least 127 people dead and France in a nationwide state of emergency.
They were among dozens fleeing through a back exit of the Bataclan theatre where Islamic State gunmen mercilessly slaughtered up to 100 fans before blowing themselves up in a series of co-ordinated attacks across the French capital.
France was placed in lockdown after at least eight militants, all wearing suicide vests, brought unprecedented violence to the streets of the French capital in the bloodiest attack in Europe since the Madrid train bombings in 2004.Â
Itâs also being reported that the gunmen were shouting âAllah Akbar,â with one man reportedly having been âbeheadedâ inside the concert hall where hostages were being held before they were slaughtered âone by oneâ.
And if that wasnât enough to identify the culprits, two suicide bombers were involved.
Sounds like radical Islamic terrorism to me.
Obama: “I don’t want to speculate.”
Need anymore proof of clinical Orwellian Thought Control?
If it’s not on The Agenda, it doesn’t exist.
Obama made clear his reasons for his more careful word choices at the White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism in February.
âAll of us have a responsibility to refute the notion that groups like [ISIS] somehow represent Islam, because that is a falsehood that embraces the terrorist narrative,â he said.
âWe are not at war with Islam,â Obama added. âWe are at war with people who have perverted Islam.â
It Islam but it’s not Islam, Doublethink at it’s finest. They are Terrorists who are Muslims but they aren’t Muslim Terrorists… đ
The left’s defense (hilariously from ThinkProgress): George W. Bush, The Great Satan and Destroyer of the World (to them) didn’t say it, so Obama doesn’t have to either. So there!
Wow. The depths of the pathology of Leftists is mind-numbing. Literally.
158 people are dead from a terrorist attack by Muslims, but yet it’s not Islamic Terrorism!!
We don’t want to be ISLAMOPHOBIC, now do we… Allah Ackbar! BOOM! đ
Hey, lets give terrorists 150 Billion Dollars and a the capacity to make Nuclear Weapons!!!
But at least we’re not Islamophobic! đ
This month’s suicide bombings in Beirut and the bombing of a Russian commercial jetliner by the Islamic State, which killed 40 and 244, respectively.
Now 158 (and maybe more) in Paris.
In fact, it is now an existential threat to the American homeland. Within days of the IS-inspired stabbing of four on a California college campus, the FBI Thursday arrested an IS agent in Akron, Ohio, who solicited the murder of more than 100 U.S. service members.
Black Muslim convert Terrence J. McNeil, 25, allegedly distributed their names and addresses to IS websites along with the IS command: “Kill them in their own lands, behead them in their own homes, stab them to death as they walk their streets thinking that they are safe.”
The federal complaint says that McNeil, who pressured the hospital he worked for to let him wear his beard out of respect for his religion, last year posted an Internet message: “I can’t wait for another 9/11, Boston bombing or Sandy Hook.”
In another, he said, “I’m an African-American and native American so this country has made my people suffer (for) years . … I would gladly take part in an attack on this murderous regime and the people.”
Added McNeil: “I’ll be proud when I sled(sic) American blood,” later suggesting the bombing of “a church, school or mall.”
The case is just one of 900 active investigations of IS operatives inside the U.S., as FBI Director James Comey revealed earlier this month.
But at least they are “contained”. After all, Obama is always right.
“To the students of color at Mizzou, we stand with you in solidarity. To those who would threaten their sense of safety, we are watching.
Yeah, they want safety from people who would disagree with their cry baby narcissism… Mommy Government make them stop! đ
Ken YanagisawaStudents at Yale stand in solidarity with Mizzou.Â
The guy who started it is from a 1%er multi-million dollar capitalist family….
Oh, and it’s a Hoax, just like “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot”. Gee, no one saw that coming…Least of all Zombie Liberals.
Nice COMMUNIST Symbology. Learn that in College did we? đ
*******
SO with that, Matt Walsh:
Dear Walmart,
I am writing to inform you of a terrible attack I suffered in one of your stores this week. The assault against me was so violent and oppressive that I had to immediately retreat to my healing space, where I lay whimpering on the floor for three and a half days, barely able to move or breathe. I emerge now, courageously, only because I must see that those responsible are made to answer for their crimes. I feel deeply triggered even speaking about it, but I must soldier on, in the name of #Justice.
Shutterstock
It all started in the parking lot of my local Walmart. I was walking from my car to the store, minding my own business, when suddenly another customer, a man, walked up and accosted me. I should pause here and apologize to the transgender, agender, nongender, pangender, bigender, trigender, and quasigender communities if they feel offended or victimized because Iâm labeling this individual a man. To be honest, he never mentioned his gender identity, and I would be the last person to ever assume anything about anyone. But in this case I feel comfortable guessing that the entity in question was a man because, in my experience, only cisgender white Christian Republican middle class heterosexual men are ever guilty of doing anything wrong. Anyway, I donât really believe in labels, except for the five or six labels I just used in the previous sentence.
So, back to the incident. The man came alongside me, out of nowhere and without invitation, and immediately started sharing opinions with me. They were bad opinions. Opinions I didnât like. Opinions that were different and confusing and scary. Opinions that shouldnât exist. Opinions that made me feel delegimitized and otherized and vaporized. Literally vaporized. The opinions were like a death ray that zapped me and reduced me to ash and rubble.
Somehow, in the midst of this barrage, I was able to let out a desperate shriek. âSTOP,â I yelled. âSTOP. DEAR GOD. STOP.â He looked at me and even his look was offensive because I could tell in his head he was still thinking opinions that werenât my opinions. âHOW DARE YOU DEVALUE MY LIFE EXPERIENCES,â I shouted.
He told me he had no idea what that meant. I could tell heâd never been to college. I put up my hands â just like they teach us in college â and started screaming âSAFE SPACE, SAFE SPACE, IâM IN MY SAFE SPACEâ over and over again.
I thought that was the end of it. They told me in college nobody is allowed to think differently, and if anyone ever does think differently, all I need to do is run to my safe space. Everyone has to respect my safe space, which isnât to be confused with my healing space, although my healing space must also be respected.
But these defenses were useless against the man. He only upped the ante. He insulted me. INSULTED ME. Do you understand what Iâm saying to you? He formed words with his lips and ejected sounds from his throat and those sounds came out in the form of insults. He called me names. All kinds of names. All kinds of terrible, awful names. Iâd repeat them here but I fear it would only cause others to experience the trauma I am now suffering.
I ran away from the man. I ran away as fast as I could, but he was still shouting words, and I felt like I might never escape. Eventually I made it into the store. In a haze of anxiety and confusion I grabbed several items from the shelf and tried to leave without paying for them. The manager stopped me. I explained to him that Iâd just been insulted by some guy outside. He said heâs sorry about that but it doesnât mean I get to steal.
Steal? STEAL? Iâd just been mugged by opinions and insults moments earlier, and now I was being accused of doing something that I was in the process of doing? I couldnât believe it. I couldnât believe any of it. Is there no end to the intolerance?
I have been meditating on this series of tragedies ever since that day. It has become clear to me, especially in light of the inspiring protests at the University of Missouri, that I have no choice but to demand the immediate resignation of Walmart CEO Doug McMillon.
You might call me ridiculous. You might say this story sounds at least partially fabricated. You might say that even if it isnât, it has nothing to do with the CEO of the company, nor does it have anything to do with the company at all. You might say this was one unpleasant man who said unpleasant things, and thereâs no reason why anyone from Walmart should have to answer for it. You might say thereâs really no reason why anything at all should be done, frankly. People say mean things to other people sometimes, you might say. Thereâs not always a remedy or a recourse, nor should we try to find one, you might say.
But you are only saying this because you are white and privileged. I myself do not identify as white. My motherâs step-dadâs auntâs hairdresserâs cousin visited an Indian reservation in the 50s, so I naturally consider myself part Cherokee â or Mohican or Aztec or whatever. Indeed, I suspect the man at Walmart probably chose to attack me because he harbors bigotries against Native Americans. At one point he even said âI harbor bigotries against Native Americans.â I know that doesnât sound like something an actual person would say, even if they do harbor bigotries against Native Americans, but anyone who accuses me of exaggerating obviously harbors bigotries against Native Americans.
So I must insist that Doug McMillon take responsibility for fostering an environment where people feel comfortable having bigotries and opinions in the parking lots of his stores. I canât point to any one specific thing Mr. McMillon has done to create this issue, but that is precisely the problem. His inaction is the real outrage here.
Indeed, what has Mr. McMillon done? What has he done to stop people from saying mean things in and around the nationâs Walmarts? Has he posted signs reminding us not to share our opinions with one another? Has he officially declared Walmarts to be No Insult Zones? Has he made any attempt to give his customers a true understanding of the impact hurtful words have on marginalized populations? Has he set up safe spaces in his stores where those dealing with the effects of unpleasant phrases and ideas can go to regroup and share their feelings? Has he followed the progressive lead of the University of Missouri and established racially segregated healing spaces so that different minority groups can be vulnerable around others who share their authentic racial experiences? Has he instituted mandatory inclusivity and sensitivity seminars for all of his employees and customers? Has he conducted awareness campaigns to make people aware of things? Has he then followed those awareness campaigns with awareness awareness campaigns to make people aware of the awareness? Has he even taken the basic step of offering free Yoga classes in the back of every Walmart to help his customer de-stress?
Has he done any of this? No? Nothing? Exactly.
At this point, the only recourse is for Mr. McMillon to issue a public apology, resign his post, forfeit his severance, donate all of his money to a hippy commune or public university of my choice, burn his house down, and live the rest of his life under a bridge. I can see no other solution.
Next, I am forced to demand the manager of my local store resign and repay me the money he made me hand over for the items I tried to allegedly steal. Also, I demand that the governor of Maryland be arrested, the president impeached, the U.N. disbanded, and Australia nuked into oblivion. All of these people, organizations, and countries did nothing to stop that man from insulting me, and they must all pay the price, even in their own blood if necessary. I wish it did not have to come to this, but it isnât my fault. Iâm simply a man who reasonably expects to only ever encounter sweetness and smiles and happy thoughts, as is my constitutional right.
Going forward, once the requisite blood sacrifices have been made to atone for the opinions and insults of one man, I make the following further demands:
I demand that anyone who has been injured by emotional or mental violence be permitted to purchase products without paying for them. People cannot be financially burdened during such a difficult time. To achieve social justice, aggrieved minorities must be given free stuff. They teach this on the first day of college.
I demand that Walmart corporate offices hire new staff according to an arbitrary quota formula I will devise. Iâll get back to you with the specifics, but I know for sure that there should be at least 12 Native Americans, 24Â black Americans, 37 homosexuals, 321 transgenders, and 600 bisexual Hispanic feminists holding high ranking positions in your company. This is just obvious. Companies that are not run by victims cannot understand victims, and if they cannot understand victims, they cannot prevent victims from being victimized, which is really the primary job of every company and every person everywhere.
I demand that Walmart greeters be replaced with therapeutic asexual cuddlers. It is appalling that I ran through your store with tears streaming down my cheeks and not one â not ONE â employee offered to cuddle me and make me feel better. Every employee should be given consensual cuddle training, and there ought to be at least two specialists stationed by the entrances and exits of the stores. Again, this is obvious stuff.
I demand that Walmart identify marginalized employees and customers and immediately make them general managers of their own stores.
I demand that all customers and employees be required to ride electric scooters so that the elderly and the morbidly obese donât feel otherized.
I demand that Walmart develop a strategic five year plan to end hurting and sadness. During this process, you must cooperate and consult with the Social Justice Diversity Tolerance Outreach and Inclusiveness Center, which is an institution youâll also have to create and fund and operate and staff.
I am hereby beginning a #HungerStrike until my demands are met. Some might call me a #HeroForSocialJustice but I like to think Iâm just a regular guy whoâs finally taking a stand. Heroically.
You have 12 hours to do everything Iâve commanded, or else your stores will be flooded with a racially and sexually diverse group of young, well-dressed, upper middle class protesters who will hold signs and chant slogans and Tweet about the oppression youâve brought upon them.
What is going on at the University of Missouri?  Their president, Tom Wolfe resigned after protest erupted because he didnât respond decisively enough to various racist incidents on campus.  (In a dramatic flourish, the schoolâs football team even went on a hunger strike.)
Or at least this is what the news is reporting. Â David French, on National Review, takes umbrage at this explanation, because it âcollapses under the slightest scrutiny.â
He writes:
The idea that Wolfe presided over a racially insensitive educational empire is a sad joke. A timeline of racial outrages in Columbia is sparse indeed, showing two allegations of racial name-calling (on a campus with 35,000 students) and one disturbing incident in which a swastika was drawn on a dorm wall with human waste. No rational, sentient human being believes system presidents can be responsible for what lunatics do with their own feces, or that they can prevent any given student from shouting racial slurs. Not even the worst communist dictatorships could control the speech of all their subjects. Wolfe couldnât stop drunk undergraduates from hurling insensitive insults even if he established his own gulag and deployed commissars across campus.â
Oh but they are:
The Missouri University Police Department (MUPD) sent an email to students Tuesday morning urging them to call them and report any hurtful speech they encounter on the campus.
In an email that was flagged by several Missouri-based journalists, the MUPDÂ asked âindividuals who witness incidents of hateful and/or hurtful speech or actionsâ to call the departmentâs general phone line âto continue to ensure that the University of Missouri campus remains safe.â They suggest that students provide a detailed description of the offender, their location or license plate number, and even to take a picture if possible.
In the email, MUPD readily admits that hurtful or hateful speech is not against the law. But, they write, âif the individuals identified are students, MUâs Office of Student Conduct can take disciplinary action.â
In a statement to Mediaite, the MUPD confirmed that the email was real. When asked about the potential First Amendment implications, a spokesman responded simply, âWe are simply asking them to report what they feel is hurtful and/or hateful speech.â
Aka, not politically correct and not what the little cherubs of easily offended social justice didn’t want to hear.
He added that the police did not consider the hateful speech âa criminal matter.â However, âWe also work for the University and uphold the Universities Rules and Regulations.â
Fortunately for the radicals, our universities are populated by the craven and the cowardly. Push a professor, even slightly, and itâs likely heâll fold. Demand faculty support for your protest, and dozens will rush to join, self-righteously advancing their own false oppression narratives even as they enjoy lives billions of others would covet. There is nothing brave about these people. They are not âelite.â They donât deserve a single dime of taxpayer money or one cent of student tuition. They dishonor their schools and their country.
A Mizzou professor almost resigned his position at the school after he said a scheduled exam would take place, despite his class raising security concerns due to the growing tension on campus. They felt âunsafe.â
Campus Reform reported that Dr. Dale Brigham received the ire of the news media for âshamingâ minority students for being worried about death threats, one man was arrested for posting such threats earlier this morning. Yet, MU police have increased security, they’re confident that the campus remains safe, and the administration has not placed the school on lockdown or sent anybody home. This situation is being overblown (shocker), though it wouldn’t be a social justice warrior sideshow without things being egregiously exaggerated. The fact that a professor almost checked out for doing his job is ridiculous, especially since he wasnât the personification of evil.
In the end, the school did not accept Brigham’s resignation.
The University of Missouri has become a subject of debate, given that both the universityâs president and chancellor resigned after the student body felt they failed to address alleged instances of racism on campus. Yet, that story seems to be evaporating in the ether. The story is now about the protestorsâ horrific violation and disrespect for First Amendment rights; a textbook example of petulance from a group of kids absorbed by political correctness.
According to a social media message being circulated among social justice student groups at the University of Missouri, better known as Mizzou, students are being encouraged to carry pepper spray and tasers to protect their “safe spaces” and blacks.
The University of Missouriâs student body vice president did not mince words when she used an appearance on MSNBC Wednesday to say journalists who claim to be exercising their First Amendment rights while reporting on the Mizzou protests are actually creating a âhostileâ and âunsafeâ environment.
When asked about complaints from professors that universities are becoming âplaces of censor and prohibition,â Smith-Lezama said people are using the First Amendment to create a âhostile and unsafe learning environment.â
âI personally am tired of hearing that First Amendment rights protect students when they are creating a hostile and unsafe learning environment for myself and for other students here,â Smith-Lezama said. âI think that itâs important for us to create that distinction and create a space where we can all learn from one another and start to create a place of healing rather than a place where we are experiencing a lot of hate like we have in the past.â
“Sensitive and confidential info: We’re (black students and our closest allies) gonna occupy the bcc from 9am until. We don’t want them to feel in control. So we’ll hold study hall in our safe place all day and escort ppl wherever they need to be. But don’t put this info on any public platform. Let ppl know thru TEXT & DMs only please. Have pepper spray, taser, whatever non-lethal weapon if possible. Help protect our safe space and spread the word so blacks can be protected,” the message reads.
In other words, everyday events that are bearable for anyone with a scintilla of rational thought are considered apocalyptic to these students.
Social Justice Warriors Unite! Don’t Let them “offend” you. Crush them! đ
Apparently, honoring the military cannot include the most basic of patriotic symbols at a school in the Northwest. Seattle Pacific University, a Christian school, recently ruled that the “Students for Military Veterans Support” club could not present colors or say the pledge of allegiance at their Veterans Day ceremony due to “diversity.”
SPU released this statement:
âThe organizers decided not to include the pledge of allegiance and the presentation of colors during the November 10 chapel, given that there are diversity of views on campus whether such elements should be part of a Christian worship service.”
Holding the ceremony in the campus chapel has allegedly caused an uproar amongst an anonymous group of students. “At SPU there is a lot of diversity and different perspectives of faith,” Martin said, noting that there are some Christian perspectives that embrace pacifism. “They believe that anything associated with war is not something that Christians should be associated with. They wanted to voice their opinion about how that would make them feel uncomfortable in a chapel and that Christians should not be supporting a symbol of the state.” (MYNorthwest)
The PC Minority rules. That’s “diversity”. Ban it. I guess the meaning of the word “diversity” escapes their tiny little Orwellian feed minds.
Yeah, the warmongers might offend some pacifists! Ooooh. now that’s a reason to ban The Pledge of Allegiance that the veterans you allege to honor fought and died for!
Students for Military Veterans Support club member Daniel Fenlason thinks such a ruling is unfair:
âWe should be able to pledge allegiance to the flag inside of our own church, in our own house of worship [for] the same people who died for that same right.â (MRC)
I guess they wanted an “Allah Ackbar” too, for diversity? đ
Commentor LeadRunner: Ok, folks, I am a vet, and I have always played by the rules, but this is enough. This is not what I served for. This is pure and utter bull sh!t and needs to come to an immediate halt. If what this country stands for is so offensive to these people, then they should just get out. Eventually, the real Americans are going to reach their limit and it will get very ugly, but we will return to some semblance of reality.
At the rate weâre going, it will be a crime one day soon to offend someone.
Isn’t already effective true. This was apparently self-censorship because of the massive PC environment that Big Brother Liberals had going as it is.
A Long Island mall puts Santa in a spaceship & removes a Christmas tree so as not to offend. Yale students are offended by Halloween costumes and demand the University provide them a âsafe space.â The Univ. of Mizzou football team wonât play because theyâre offended by something someone said on campus, and another university wonât allow someone who fought ISIS to speak on campus because pro ISIS students might be offended. (Walshfreedom)
BUT
The “Diversity Police” caved when pressured, which is what you have to do to the PC Police. You can’t give in.
95ksj.com: Local radio host Dori Monson publicly supported the clubâs position on her show. “I am sick and tired of how all of society has to … cater to the vocal minority of the easily offended,” Dori said. “If they don’t like the flag and the pledge being part of this chapel â don’t attend the chapel. Don’t attend the ceremony. To deny everybody else, that is the tyranny of the minority imposing their will.”
Within hours of those comments the university changed course. “We regret that our initial decision about our Veterans Day service caused so much misunderstanding.
MISUNDERSTANDING!
MISUNDERSTANDING!
MY F*CKING ASS!
THERE WAS NO “MISUNDERSTANDING” about your PC “Diversity Police”. None whatsoever.
It was never our intent to dishonor our veterans or their service to our country,” the university said in a statement.â
Yeah, you just wanted to be Politically Correct, which is sickening enough as it is!!
Offending people is exactly what needs to be protected, not banned, you idiots!
The very essence of freedom is the freedom to offend people.
The freedom is what these veterans fought and died for you, you morons!