The revenge of the Sexist,Racist,Homophobic, Islamophobic, Russian Loving Neanderthals! 🙂


The virus that is Liberalism has accused Trump of “treason” 4 times since Nov 8th. That’s almost once every week and a half.

Means it could pop up over 125 times in the next 4 years.

In the lead up to President-elect Donald Trump’s election, 12 women came out and said that the New York businessman had sexually assaulted them. Many have remained silent since the election, and none have made it known that they seek to file a lawsuit against Trump for the alleged sexual assault.

Most have recanted, been proven to be liars or simply just disappeared with their bribe money.

So Obama in response is busy burning everything down, destroying as much as he can and poisoning as many wells as possible.

Last month, an energy policy analyst for The Wall Street Journal reported that President Barack Obama’s administration had begun “readying at least five big environmental rules to issue in the two months between the election and Inauguration Day.”

In late December, the American Action Forum provided a frightening breakdown of just how much money these regulations would ultimately cost the American taxpayers.

“These five measures alone could impose $5.1 billion in costs and more than 350,000 paperwork burden hours,” AAF wrote. “In addition, three other rules in proposed form could add $898 million in burdens and 146,000 paperwork hours, for a cumulative total of nearly $6 billion in potential midnight costs and nearly 500,000 burden hours from the two agencies.”

The goal,  was to overwhelm President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration with more rules and regulations than it would have either the time or resources to repeal.

He has pulled all carriers from the Middle East.

But our Petulant Soon-t0-be-Ex-President isn’t vindictive! 🙂


One of my favorite parts of Trump’s America is witnessing leftists’ sudden concern with the Constitution. Like the old document has been hiding these past eight years, and now, just now, they’re treating it like a neglected transgendered toddler. Unchecked executive power was the cat’s pajamas under President Obama. Now that President Trump can have those same powers and play by those same rules? You could say it’s a come to Jesus moment. Except leftists find Jesus triggering.

Please enjoy this short film illustrating just how amusing it can be…

This is a clear case of the other shoe dropping on your face. Or maybe that’s a shoe on the other hand? I’m mixing my metaphors. Whatever it is, leftists are dropping deuces in their diapers. Oh sure, too much power in the executive was fine with his Majesty Obama. But now the orang-haired tycoon who oft uses the word “frankly” as a verbal crutch has the executive pen?

“BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION???!!!” leftists cry. Even though for the past eight years the left has used the constitution to wipe their pimply posteriors. Rich. Pass the creme.

So when your favorite Leftist suddenly gets religion about too many executive orders (as their God passes massive numbers of them at the last moment), Presidential overreach, and the protection of “rights” you can just laugh in their face and say “Happy New Year”. 🙂

Jane, you ignorant slut… 🙂








Since O’Petulant One, The Almighty and Power BO is on an Ancient Rome poison the well, burn down everything, destroy, destroy, destroy before he leaves office in 3 weeks and decided to stab Israel with a broad sword from his anti-Semitic loins with the help of the UN which has been anti-Israel and anti-US for years…


In his lame-duck attempt to undermine the State of Israel with a diplomatic knifing in the front, President Obama has created fertile ground for a campaign to lead the United States out of the United Nations. Or as I call it: USexit.

A Usexit movement has rarely ever taken hold, with the last attempt to encourage such a move dying in committee in 2015. Then, Congressman Mike Rogers (R-AL) alongside a number of other Congressmen and women floated the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (ASA).

At the time, the bill called for a repeal of The United Nations Participation Act of 1945, much like how Brexit campaigners in the United Kingdom would prefer not to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty and simply repeal the 1972 European Communities Act.

The ASA called for the following:

    The President shall terminate all membership by the United States in the United Nations, and in any organization, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations.


    The United States Mission to the United Nations is closed. Any remaining functions of such office shall not be carried out.

Commenting at the time, Rep. Mike Rogers said: “Why should the American taxpayer bankroll an international organization that works against America’s interests around the world?” The time is now to restore and protect American sovereignty and get out of the United Nations.”

His Senate colleague Rand Paul (R-KY) has previously remarked: “I dislike paying for something that two-bit Third World countries with no freedom attack us and complain about the United States,” explained the senator, who is also Ron Paul’s son. “There’s a lot of reasons why I don’t like the UN, and I think I’d be happy to dissolve it.”

In brief, the actions of the U.S. government over the past week proves President Obama, the U.S. administration, and the wider left-establishment cabal have learned nothing from 2016. They still believe that they — not “We The People” — control the political priorities of the nation.

And they fail to realise how putting a spotlight on an already morally questionable institution like the United Nations — replete with its Human Rights Council with the likes of Saudi Arabia chairing it — brings the UN itself, not Israel’s settlement-building policies, into question.

So expect a resurgence of the American Sovereignty Act and an invigorated USexit movement in the next few months.

There are of course a few reasons for the U.S. to maintain the United Nations on its home turf — not least the fact that the New York-based organisation allows the U.S. to spy on almost every country in the world from the comfort of downtown Manhattan.

But the Obama administration has now accidentally heaped pressure on this relationship, and the intelligence community has, as yet, not uttered a peep about it. Too busy working on undermining the next President of the United States with the whole Russia saga, perhaps.

So our Petulant Leader for 3 weeks more is letting out as many GITMO detainees as he can (and when they kill Americans it will be Trump’s fault) and waging his dog at Putin.

The new executive order signed by Obama offers no new proof that the Russian government was involved in what it calls “tampering with, altering, or causing a misappropriation of information with the purpose or effect of interfering with or undermining election processes or institutions.”

In place of proof of these serious claims, the Obama White House said it will “be providing a report to Congress in the coming days about Russia’s efforts to interfere in our election, as well as malicious cyber activity related to our election cycle in previous elections.” Including his? 🙂

The Almighty Petulant one is going to burn the place down before he leaves.

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

Political Cartoons by Chip Bok

And Your Mom Too.

Wow!  Mortality is a bitch! The fact that anyone of us can go at any second is a mental conceit we don’t allow ourselves too much to think about but WOW! what a couple of days.

Carrie Fisher passes on Tuesday.

Her mother has a stroke and passes away THE VERY NEXT DAY!

The Grim Reaper is quite a busy boy this week.

It reminds me that my time here is limited. The mental conceit we all have about tomorrow is just that, conceit.

For all I know I could die writing this blog. 🙂

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Carrie Fisher didn’t have a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, so fans have taken over a blank sidewalk star to pay tribute to the late “Star Wars” actress.


“She brought the galaxy hope,” Thomas said in a Facebook live video. “She deserves a star, now she lives amongst them. She was the flame that lit the fire that burned the empire to the ground.

Political Cartoons by Steve Breen

Lost a Princess

No politics today.

What i will say is that every day since my late father was said to have requested no funeral or service when he died, in 2015, because “no one he knew would be there besides family” is becoming more true by the day as people from my childhood are dying off. In 2016, it seems at an an alarming rate.

So i had this thought last night as I was going to bed.

“If I live long enough, the world and the people I was born into will be completely and utterly dead by the time I kick off.”

I find that very depressing. Maybe I have been right all along about depression, pessimism, and a general sense of ennui.

Life is great though. The alternative sucks worse.

But live long enough and everything you knew and everybody you knew will similarly be dead.

I need a hug… 🙂

RIP Carrie Fisher and Richard Adams (“Watership Down”) at the same time.

Fish, Abe Vigoda (Barney Miller), and Carol Brady, Florence Henderson too.

2016 has been a cruel year for childhood memories.

“Help me Obi-Wan Kenobi, you’re my only hope”


In Wishful Drinking—a one-woman show Fisher later adapted into a book—Fisher dug into her complicated relationship with the Star Wars franchise, which both made her a household name and, she jokingly wrote, “ruined” her life. One of her most amusing anecdotes about shooting the first film involves Princess Leia’s signature white outfit and a special bit of world-building by Star Wars czar George Lucas:

George comes up to me the first day of filming and he takes one look at the dress and says, “You can’t wear a bra under that dress.”

So, I say, “Okay, I’ll bite. Why?”

And he says, “Because. . . there’s no underwear in space.”

Right! Of course! There are, however, gold bikinis in space; everyone knows that.

According to Fisher, Lucas did eventually explain why galaxies far, far away are underwear-free zones—which led her to a great gag about how she’d eventually like to go:

What happens is you go to space and you become weightless. So far so good, right? But then your body expands??? But your bra doesn’t—so you get strangled by your own bra.

Now I think that this would make for a fantastic obit—so I tell my younger friends that no matter how I go, I want it reported that I drowned in moonlight, strangled by my own bra.

As you wish, your Worshipfulness.

I wish I was that funny.

But I did here that her death over shadowed Obama’s self-made Look-at-me moment when the Japanese Prime Minister visited Pearl Harbor to stoke Obama’s ego and then be tossed aside when his ego was done with him.

On Monday, Abe visited the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific in Honolulu, where he also paid tribute to those Americans who lost their lives when the Japanese conducted their sneak-attack.

Obama didn’t join him there, instead golfing and taking wife Michelle to dinner at the pricy eatery Alan Wong’s. (NY Post)

Ok, so politics snuck in there anyways, my bad… 🙂


Virus Warning

In what might be the most racist screed to come across the internet in some time, the Black-themed website “The Root” has published a piece calling “whiteness” a “virus.”

Writer T.D. Williams writes that the sole purpose of “whiteness” is “preserving itself” above all else and is the reason for Donald Trump’s election.

“Whiteness in America is a virus whose sole purpose is preserving itself, regardless of the overall cost and collateral damage,” he writes.

Facts no longer matter; nor does the Constitution. The economy doesn’t matter; nor does our international policy. Logic doesn’t matter; nor does decency. Ann Coulter pined for a voting policy that would have disenfranchised her chosen candidate. A Des Moines, Iowa, cop killer identified himself as a protester of cop haters. A significant portion of our citizens now view our once archnemesis and its leader, Putin, as simpatico. The people who predict voter fraud commit it, and add in a deadly side of voter suppression for good measure.

Williams claims there’s literally nothing that can be done about the scourge of “whiteness.”

Their problem, this whiteness, is—judging by history—an incurable disease. Sharing a classroom, drinks and meals with blacks, no matter how intelligent and generous and kind they were, could not persuade Roman to abandon artifice. Learning alongside a literary luminary and all-around beautiful soul couldn’t do it, either. We have seen in the NFL and NCAA that spending hours upon hours with blacks, working alongside them or benefiting from their labor, cannot do it. Roman and his lot cannot reject the disease of whiteness and its attendant fact-free, genocidal history and future because they are too cowardly not to choose, as Baldwin put it, safety instead of life.

This is the kind of racial hyperventilating that we’re going to have to put up with for the next several years. Rather than focus on the real reasons why Donald Trump won the election, they’re going to chalk it up to simple racism.

And since this “racism” they see everywhere is “incurable,” there’s never an end. They will always be victims, white people will always be the enemy.

That way, the cycle of hatred, bigotry and division can go on for eternity.

That’s what they want, right?

Gee, it sounds more like Liberalism is a Virus…Hmmmm…To Be Continued.

It Ain’t Over

You know in your heart that the Left has learned ABSOLUTELY NOTHING  about their humiliating defeat. They learned nothing after 2010. They are not capable of it.

They are impervious to learning any valuable lessons. They just think us Neanderthals cheated or they weren’t pure enough and dedicated enough to beat us. It’s our fault they lost, not theirs.

They STILL want a word of “diversity” where you have no choice but do everything they want, when they want, because they want. They are very “tolerant” of that.

I wish I could tell you that, having dodged the naggy bullet that was Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit, we can now spend the next four years being left alone. But that’s not in the cards. Liberals won’t – because they can’t – pause to reflect on how they should stop being such insufferable jerks and live with us normals in peace and mutual respect. Instead, they are doubling down on their gambit for unrestrained power over every aspect of our lives, fueled by a hatred for Donald Trump that is, in reality, a hatred for us.

Remember, they really do hate us. Just ask them.

Just watch what they do. They will always side against us – even when a professional scammer stages a fake “hate crime” on an airplane. They will side with the hoaxer even though every single “Trump-inspired hate crime” – and almost all others – turns out to be a hoax. Every. Single. One.

THEY DON’T CARE. The “compassion” brigade has no compassion for anyone who isn’t them or willing do everything they want them to do without question or hesitation.

When it comes down to it, they are more worried that some buffoon will sneer at a woman trapped in burka than that the psychotic creep who stuck in it will butcher a bunch of normal Americans while shouting “Allah akbar!” We have to say “No” – normal lives matter.

Understand that they will not stop. They will not change. We must therefore defeat them, because otherwise there will be no peace. As with so much in life, Dolph Lundgren shows us the way, though in this case liberals are less a macho, tough prizefighter named “Rocky” than a 23 year-old gender-fluid Oberlin grad named “Fussy” who lives in Brooklyn off of his/her/xes dad’s money while trying to be a non-rhyming poet.

We must keep fighting. We must never give an inch, never back down, never give up.


We must respond to every attack upon us, large or small, with overwhelming firepower. But defense is not enough – we must go on offense, seize the initiative, and aggressively destroy anything that will aid liberals in their long-term goal of rendering us silenced and subservient.

They are the Radical Islamic Terrorists of American Politics. They are on a Jihad. Nothing less there total control of everything is acceptable to them.

The Democratic Party? Smash it.

The mainstream media? Crush it.

Academia? Nuke it ‘til it glows, preferably from orbit.

It’s the only way to be sure.

It’s a lethal self-replicating , narcissistic virus.

They babble on about not “normalizing” Trump’s election when their real goal is to delegitimize anyone exercising political power but themselves. This is not about Trump – this about us. Reluctant Rockettes? Radical LGBT jerks screaming at children on airplanes? And my personal favorite, the recent discovery by the very people who never saw a Soviet rear they didn’t hurry to kiss that the Russians aren’t our pals. This is how liberals intend to break our will to resist, with a never-ending series of petty controversies and provocations until, exhausted, we simply give up and surrender, exhausted, to their benign dictatorship.

Well, to quote their failed progressive goddess, we ain’t in no ways tired.

Fight. Every time, in every way.

Some jerk mouths off to you on Twitter? Smack ‘em back until they are a quivering mass of whiny liberal Jell-O.

Some company decides to take sides against us? Boycott their crappy products and let them know it. Hey Kellogg’s, hope your liberal constituency enjoys its diabetes. And support the companies that reject liberal scams – fly Delta!


Some mainstream media liar lies? Carpet bomb the comments and unsubscribe to his dying paper.

Oh, and some spazz starts shrieking at you and your kids? Use appropriate force within the bounds of the self-defense laws in your state, of course, to protect yourself and your family.

Remember: Liberals are fearful because they know the kind of oppression they absolutely intended to inflict upon us if they had won, and they worry that we will do to them what they wanted to do to us. Well, I say let’s make their fears come true by demolishing their cultural edifice of hate and tyranny. Let them rule over the smoldering ruins of their dreams of power.

Look, none of us want to spend our lives in permanent battle mode, but there’s no time out for the foreseeable future. We don’t have a choice. Our enemies – and understand that progressives are our enemies, not just opponents of good will who merely disagree with us – will not give up. They can’t give up, because they are so invested in liberal fascism and in controlling us that they have nothing else, leaving them no option but perpetual cultural and political war.

They are (in their heads) Homo Superior Liberalis, a superior form of life is being thwarted from it’s holy mission by grubby, mindless, moronic, insensitive, racistt, bigotted, homophobic Neanderthals!

Good is being thwarted by evil, in their minds. They are the angels of mercy, compassion and diversity. You, and me, we are the Dark Side and it’s is their holy mission to destroy us.

We would rather life get back to normal, but there is no “normal,” not anymore.

You may not care about politics, but politics cares about you, and if we just give up and let these nanny state parasites go unchallenged we will eventually wake up in chains. Forcing our little girls to be surrounded by urinating men in dresses is not the endstate – it’s just the beginning of a never-ending series of cruel humiliations and calculated oppressions liberals will seek to inflict upon us. Their goal is not just to take power but to revel in the wicked delight of rubbing our faces in our powerlessness.

They hate us. Get that through your head, then act accordingly. And acting accordingly means fight back, hard and ruthlessly, every time they try to assert their tyrannical inclinations.

But mere defense is not enough, though it is essential that each and every slight, provocation and assault be met with overwhelming and merciless pushback. It means attacking and gutting the liberal power base by popping the institutional pustules where progressivism festers.

Trump and the GOP must ruthlessly slash the governmental funding mechanisms that force us to pay for our own oppressors. Defund Planned Parenthood, sure. But that’s just a start. NPR, PBS, and all the rest need to go too. Outlaw collusive federal government lawsuit “settlements” that force companies to fund leftist “non-profits.” Derail the liberal gravy train.

Wreak the Democrat Party. Ignore the liberal lie that minorities are too dumb to obtain ID – aggressively move to fix the election system to ensure liberals in big cities can no longer cheat. And yeah, they cheat. Enforce immigration laws and stop letting them import foreigners to outvote the Americans who reject Democrat nonsense. Support President Trump as he seeks the support of minority Americans – the Democrats rely on retaining minority support through lies and governmental dependence. Break that cycle, and it becomes a party of a few white wine-drinking toffs in high income zip codes and college towns.

Crush the college cartel. Slash their budgets. Attack the student loan scam that transfers money from naive young people to scheming academics who steal the futures of their grads in return for useless degrees in gender studies.

Punish the mainstream media by going around them. Don’t subscribe. Don’t watch. Support the Trump administration as it avoids the gatekeepers via alternative media and by communicating with us directly via Twitter. Support the alternative media yourself – if you are paying for the New York Times or watching NBC, you are collaborating with the enemy. And the same goes for the entertainment industry – refuse to watch or read leftist propaganda and support independent entertainment and books like, well, mine.

Here are your three choices. There are only three. Pick one.

1. Peaceful coexistence while leaving everyone alone and free.

2. Conservatives in charge, protecting normal Americans’ freedom

3. Liberal in charge, persecuting normal Americans.

I would prefer Choice One, but liberals seem to have vetoed that. Fine. Then Choice Two it is – us in charge, because allowing these aspiring liberal fascists to rule us is no choice at all. (Kurt Schlichter)


Happy Federal Holiday

For any Snowflakes reading this: TRIGGER WARNING!!!

“Merry Christmas” everyone and this year, make sure to shout it loud and proud!

This classic from 2015. MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!  (says the evil White Male…)

2015: Stories of political correctness run amok on college campuses when it comes to celebrating Christmas – heck, when it comes to just mentioning Christmas – continue to pile up.

The latest two examples include a professor who does not want “Merry Christmas” uttered and a university that called Christmas decorations unsafe.

University of Central Florida professor Terri Fine suggested to her campus recently that they should stop saying “Merry Christmas,” and instead use the more inclusive “Happy Federal Holiday.”

“A Holiday Greeting That Applies to Everyone” was the title of a column she penned for UCF Today that argued her idea was the best way to assure no one was offended in any way, shape or form in December.

“My friends and I wish each other a ‘Happy Federal Holiday,’” she explained, noting it’s the least offensive. Even “happy holidays” doesn’t cut it, she stated.

“Couldn’t ‘Happy Holidays’ be the most inclusive greeting because it is so non-specific? Yes, perhaps, but it is the non-specificity of ‘Happy Holidays’ that makes it inappropriate because it fails to recognize the importance of Christmas to Christians while it also suggests that Chanukah should be more important to Jews than the high holidays and festivals that come at other times during the year,” Fine wrote.

She sounds like a super-fun lady to hang with, eh?

So not letting a bad idea, especially a Politically Correct, Morally Superior (I their heads), and More Diverse idea die…“Happy Holidays” and “Merry Christmas.” Such a realm of debate brings to question total freedom of expression, toleration of differing ideologies and cultures, and how political correctness still commands the holidays.

Finally, the American people have elected a president who is brave enough to take a stand against “Happy holidays.” Over the past two decades, this widely accepted, politically correct term has been fully embraced by the retail sector, the media, and society at large. The pervasive use of that expression implies that anyone who publicly says “Merry Christmas” is a right-wing Christian extremist. Fortunately, federal law is on the side of this verbal “extremism,” as “Christmas” is the name of the federal holiday officially declared in 1870 by President Ulysses Grant and celebrated annually on December 25 — although one would not be surprised if in future decades the secular Left resumed control of the U.S. government and dropped the name Christmas for a more inclusive, non-threatening name such as “Federal Holiday” or the “25th of December.” A new poll suggests that you should not laugh at the prospect of your great-grandkids’ calling Christmas by such generic names. Two-thirds of Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 prefer that stores and businesses greet customers with “Happy Holidays,” according to the Public Religion Research Institute, a nonprofit, independent research organization. Most young Americans are obsessed with not offending anyone, and it is their progeny who could eventually make “Happy Federal Holiday” official. Not surprising is that the poll finds Christmas-greeting preferences to be politically polarizing: Two-thirds of Democrats prefer that stores and businesses say “Season’s Greetings” or “Happy Holidays,” while two-thirds of Republicans prefer that establishments not extend “religion-neutral” Christmas wishes. (National Review)

Daily Caller: I have to ask “what is the big deal, here?” The response I would come up with would be centered on the level of political correctness that exists and how it negatively envelopes against a basic federal law and degrades Constitutionally protected freedom of expression and conscience. So, once again, “what is the big deal?”

The basic rights of the First Amendment are at play, here. Not only does a devout follower of orthodox Judaism has the right to celebrate Hanukkah with his or her family but a devout Protestant also has the right to celebrate Christmas, unhindered. This also goes for the opponents of Christmas… they have the right to call for a politically correct alternative to the holiday. Moreover, though, the lost dynamic in this debate is that all the bickering is protected by free speech and a nearly 150-year-old component of the United States Code.

They don’t care about that sentiment, though. Due to this, I must infuse my criticism into the argument of this article to target such “social justice warriors” for oppressing freedom of thought. Here is my message: You have freedom to criticize; but, because of some cockamamie theory that all people will be better off censoring imagery for even the most neutral of holidays is absolute idiocy.

Forget your trigger warnings and your safe spaces because Santa Claus is coming to town and Jesus will be born as federal, state, and local government and private sector employees enjoy their Monday off.

Till then, Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, and Chag Urim Sameach!

Image result for merry Christmas Politically Correct


Have a White Guilt Christmas

From the love of the “tolerant” and “diverse” Left this Holiday Season (Can’t say the C-Word…)

The Music Television Network (MTV) released a new video targeting white men. MTV a network originally focused on playing music videos chose to air their grievances with white males by telling them what they should and should not be doing in 2017.

Good thing I stop watching or caring about MTV on any level 25+ years ago. It’s not like they play music or anything… 🙂

I guess this White Guy will continue to resolve to not watch Social Justice Arseholes make me sick on my own time. 🙂

Update: MTV took down the video after less than 48 hours following an intense backlash from online commentators.

Bwah hahahahahahahahaha! Neanderthals win! 🙂

But don’t worry, the little cherubs of “tolerance” will learn ABSOLUTELY NOTHING from this, except that we neanderthal trolls are worse than they thought. 🙂



Merry Christmas, Liberals

You can say, “Merry Christmas” again in America. The PC Stasi are out of favor and soon out of power. So Rejoice…

So, it’s Christmas time again, and your shopping is so much simpler since conservatives already have their present. We got ours when America laughed in Hillary’s face and rejected her in favor of Donald Trump.

Sorry, I just need to say that one more time because it feels so, so good.

America laughed in Hillary’s face and rejected her in favor of Donald Trump.

Oh yeah, that’s the stuff.

So, while we have the gift that keeps on giving – total control of the government – many of our liberal friends are sad. They’re despondent, confused, and a bit afraid at how things have turned out.

Oh man, this just keeps getting better and better.

No, this is about our liberal friends, about thinking of them and their needs, and in this special season we should be extra-generous. After all, they are in pain.

Sorry, but this feeling of overwhelming joy is so awesome.

Okay, back to our liberal friends. Giving is important, and so here are some gift ideas for some of the prominent liberals (and others) who have helped make 2016 the year it was – a year I can’t accurately describe within the scope of the language allowed here.

Lena Dunham: My first thought was muffins, because you can’t go wrong with muffins for Lena Dunham, but we always give muffins to Michael Moore and he’ll get jealous and upset when he realizes he could have had more muffins. So, what do you get the girl who already has everything – deep ignorance, incredible self-righteousness and no filter? Well, since Lena is always out there committing herself to whatever trendy ideology du jour she stumbles upon – feminism, Hillary, talking rocks and twigs – how about a Bible? Maybe instead of trying to fill up her empty life with nonsense she ought to try something that billions of people have found useful, enduring, and not agonizingly stupid.

Michael Moore: Muffins.

Evan McMullin: A clock that measures time starting at 15:01 minutes. It would already be on minute 17:00 or so.

The Democratic Party: A tombstone to memorialize its dead dreams.

Lindsey Graham: A ball gag. Wait, he’s probably already got several, though he sadly never uses them when the urge strikes him to talk to the media about fellow Republicans. So, how about the board game Risk so he can launch as many stupid wars as he likes without getting anybody else’s sons or daughters killed?

Bill Clinton: An electronic subscription to Bootylicious magazine so he can covertly read it on his iPad when Hillary is around, since she’s going to be around a lot. Bill Clinton is, after all, 2016’s biggest loser.

John Podesta: A pen and a pad of writing paper, because “passw0rd” is not a password.

The Media: Let’s get it a mirror, since it’s been looking for the reason we voted for Trump.

Dr. Jill Stein: A financial advisor to help her with all the dough Team Sucker forked over to her for the hilarious recount fiasco.

David Frum: A new act. The “Concerned Conservative” thing has become tiresome.

Barack Obama: A trophy engraved with the words “#1 Republican Electoral Hero of 2016.” He can put it up on his mantle with his trophies for “#1 Republican Electoral Hero of 2010” and “#1 Republican Electoral Hero of 2014,” right there next to his Nobel Peace Prize.


Harry Reid: He’s gone but not forgotten. Let’s get him an ill-tempered rowing machine.

Martin Sheen and Hollywood’s Liberal Elite: A studio and video crew on call 24/7 for whenever they feel like making a video telling normal people what to do. We want to make sure that regular Americans see as many progressive actors as possible celebsplaining at them in the run-up to 2018.

Merrick Garland: A custom coffee mug that reads “Future Jeopardy Question.”

Samantha Bee: Some sleep. She’s so tired looking, probably from non-stop shouting about Trump on whatever show she is still on.

Paul Krugman: A set of Kevlar body armor and a black assault rifle because Trump is such a fascist threat to our democracy (yeah, I know) that he is clearly morally obligated to go to war just like our Founding Fathers to defeat this impending tyranny. I mean, from what he’s said, Donald Trump is so awful and horrible and stuff that if he didn’t personally put his life on the line to fight this peril he would have to be considered either a coward or a liar. Or both.

Hillary Clinton: Give that shrill, naggy harpy a bottle of Crown Royal and point her toward the ice bucket. Then, as she staggers over to it, tumbler in claw, give her our thanks for being so transcendently awful that she inadvertently gave America a fighting chance at regaining its glory.


And of course, don’t forget my new novel for any conservative you like, and for any liberal you don’t. Merry Christmas. (Kurt Schlichter)



Michelle Grinch

The arrogant, know-it-all, School Marm to all you Neanderthals is unhappy. 😦

Just what we all need to ring in the Christmas season: Un-merry millionaire Michelle Obama belly-aching about the burdens and sacrifices of public life with billionaire Oprah Winfrey.

“There’s nowhere in the world I can go and sit and have a cup of coffee,” Obama lamented. It’s a frequent grievance. In September, she told InStyle magazine: “My hopes are to recapture some of the everydayness, some anonymity. … (I)t will be nice to open up the paper, look at the front page, and know that you’re not responsible for every headline.”

And back in June, again with Oprah, the first lady griped that living in the spotlight was like “living in a cave.”

Complain, complain, complain. What a way to make the most of your last six months in the grand and glorious White House.

For the past eight years, Obama has traveled to every corner of the planet on the taxpayers’ dime. She has splurged in Spain, traversed the Great Wall of China, tangoed in Buenos Aires, skied in Aspen, lolled in Martha’s Vineyard and feasted in Marrakesh. Thanks to her public position and celebrity, she has been bestowed “fashion icon” status — donning a $12,000 custom-made Atelier Versace gown at her final State Dinner last month after enjoying two terms clad in Givenchy, Gucci, Jason Wu, Vera Wang, Caroline Herrera and other haute couture stars whose designs are unattainable to ordinary women in America.

Count your blessings much, Mrs. Grinch? Nope. All Barack Obama’s bitter half really wants to do, she told Winfrey, is “drop into Target. I want to go to Target again.”

Funny that. The last time Obama shopped at Target, she turned the outing into a fake news narrative to stoke racial division in America. It is worth reminding the public about the noxious lie one last time before the grumbling FLOTUS leaves office because I consider her exploitation of the incident a perfect metaphor for the Obama years — faux populism bolstered by elitist Hollywood enablers, and then cynically transformed into a phony social justice crusade for crass political gain.

Back in 2012, you may remember, Obama sat down with David Letterman in one of her endless, popularity-enhancing pop culture appearances. She bragged about her ability to shop incognito at Target (does she get a secret commission every time she mentions the store?) and told a warm and fuzzy story about helping a fellow customer who didn’t recognize her. The shopper innocently asked Obama to retrieve laundry detergent from a high shelf.

“I reached up, ’cause she was short, and I reached up, pulled it down,” the first lady recounted, and the shopper joked, “Well, you didn’t have to make it look so easy.” Obama beamed as she told Letterman: “I felt so good” doing an everyday good deed. Letterman’s audience cheered at the “first ladies, they’re just like us!” theater.

Just a few years later, however, the encounter morphed into a tall tale of rampant racism, which she cunningly reshaped for People Magazine in 2014 during the aftermath of the Ferguson, Missouri riots and Black Lives Matter protests.


“Even as the first lady,” she moaned, “not highly disguised, the only person who came up to me” at a Target store “was a woman who asked me to help her take something off a shelf.” The headline of the article? “The Obamas: How We Deal With Our Own Racist Experiences.” ABC News added that Michelle Obama claimed such “incidents are ‘the regular course of life’ for African Americans and a ‘challenge’ for the country to overcome.”

Last year, Obama persisted in plying and fine-tuning her false narrative at Tuskegee University’s commencement ceremony — decrying the “sting” of “daily slights” she blamed on racism, including unnamed “clerks who kept a close eye on us in all those department stores.”

Now, as she walks away with sky-high poll ratings, a glittering Rolodex, and government benefits for life, this incredibly blessed and privileged woman has the audacity to claim that “we” are “feeling what not having hope feels like,” as she whined to her well-heeled gal pal, Oprah Winfrey.

So put upon. So downtrodden. So oppressed. To borrow one of Mrs. Woe-Is-Me’s own favorite phrases:

Bye, Felicia!

You and your manufactured miseries won’t be missed. (Michelle Malkin)

Kids, you can now eat whatever you want, the nasty old lady will soon be gone.

Image result for michelle obama political cartoon school lunch eat what you want cartoon

The Sowell of Diversity

Nothing so epitomizes the politically correct gullibility of our times as the magic word “diversity.”

Liberal definition of “diversity”: They think- “everyone’s included” but they act: “white males” (for starters) are excluded because they are evil racists and sexists. The fact that that is racist and sexist will not occur to them at all.

“DIversity” is another Agenda cudgel to beat people into submission with and anarcissistic belief of their superior morality on their part.

The wonders of diversity are proclaimed from the media, extolled in the academy and confirmed in the august chambers of the Supreme Court of the United States. But have you ever seen one speck of hard evidence to support the lofty claims?

No. But the Left doesnt’ care. After all, good intentions count in Homo Superior Liberalis.

Although diversity has become one of the leading buzzwords of our time, it has a history that goes back several generations. In the early twentieth century, the principle of geographic diversity was used to conceal bias against Jews in the admission of students to Harvard and other leading academic institutions.

Because the Jewish population was concentrated in New York and other east coast communities at that time, quota limits on how many Jewish students would be admitted were concealed by saying that Harvard wanted a diverse student body, consisting of students from around the country.

Therefore some highly qualified Jewish applicants could be passed over, in favor of less qualified applicants from the midwest or other regions of the country.

My own first encounter with the idea of geographic diversity occurred more than half a century ago, when I was an undergraduate at Harvard, and worked as a photographer for the university news office, in order to help pay the bills.

The instructions I was given were to concentrate on taking photos of students from other parts of the country, rather than from the east coast, from which Harvard already received more than enough applicants. The idea was to encourage applications from places that would produce a geographically diverse student body.

It struck me as an odd idea at the time, but I was being paid to take pictures, not make university policy. Moreover, I had no idea how such a policy had originated and, by the 1950s, it might have been continued from inertia, for all I know. Meanwhile, I could enjoy seeing publicity photos I took appearing in newspapers in Chicago and elsewhere beyond the east coast.

Fast forward to today. It is common, at colleges and universities across the country, for the test scores of Asian American students who have been admitted to a given college to be higher than the test scores of whites or of blacks or Hispanics.

That may not seem strange, since that is true of test scores in general. But, at any given institution, applying the same standards to all, the test scores of students at a particular institution would tend to be similar. More Asian Americans would be admitted to higher ranked colleges and universities, however, if the same standards were applied to all.

In short, something very much like the quota limits that were applied to Jews in the past are now being applied to Asian Americans — and, once again, are being justified by diversity.

But what justifies diversity? Nothing but unsupported assertions, repeated endlessly, piously and loudly.

Today, as in the past, diversity is essentially a fancy word for group quotas. It is one of a number of wholly subjective criteria — such as “leadership” — used to admit students to colleges and universities according to their group membership, rather than according to their individual qualifications.


This is not something new. Nor is it something confined to the United States. Very similar patterns were found more than a decade ago, when doing research for my book “Affirmative Action Around the World.”

In India, the courts’ attempts to rein in some academic quotas were met by a proliferation of new, and wholly subjective, admissions criteria. Individuals from groups that were not as qualified by objective criteria were simply ranked higher on subjective criteria and admitted.

In the United States, the Supreme Court itself has long been part of such game-playing when it comes to affirmative action. Back in 1978, an opinion by Justice Lewis F. Powell banned racial quotas with one hand and created “diversity” as a criterion with the other. In other words, colleges were told in effect that they can have racial quotas, but they just can’t call them racial quotas.

According to the Constitution, “We the People” are supposed to decide what laws and policies we live under. But not if we can be so easily fooled by courts using slippery words like “diversity.”

Orwellian word games are as inevitable with Leftists as breathing.

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel


Rogue One

No Spoilers. Just snark. You know how this ends,n or do you?…

So the Imperials are back. They have a secret plan to destroy any rebellion against their absolute rule.

They put the plans for the Death Star on a planet guarded by a Defense Shield. Then locked inside a tower guarded by many, many Imperial Weapons and soldiers.

They didn’t put it in a bathroom at the Catina on Tattooine like Darth Clinton wanted so the Rebels could hack it. But then they could blame Jabba The Putin for it. So it’s all good! 🙂

Then comes along scrappy little Jyn Erso, whom the Rebellion recruited to talk to get an introduction to another Rebel outside of their channels so they could find out about a defector who could help save the people.

They find out about The Death Star, the Imperial’s new Super Weapon to “rig” the whole Rebellion and destroy it in fear an terror.

No microaggression here.

They wanna give up right then and there. They are unsure. They are divided. They are not really unified. They want to rebel, but they want to do it on their own terms. They act for themselves in the name of a Rebellion. But when push comes to shove, they want to back off.

The Death Star is cheating!

It’s not fair.

They decided they can’t win.

So scrappy little Jyn decides, screw it, I’m going to force the issue because it’s the right thing to do.

She’s going to Trump them.

I’m going to take my team into the Blue Wall and I’m going to crack the  Imperial Code and make them fight.

I won’t tell you what happened in “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story” but we know what happened in real life so far.

Now, we have the plans to destroy The Obama Death Star. Our forces of Rebellion against are them are gathering. But, the force of the Empire are legion, especially in colleges and the media. We have traitors in our ranks and Elitist spies.

(CNN)Fifty years after “Star Trek” launched a multiracial and multicultural crew into outer space, the “Star Wars” franchise has finally joined the diversity universe. “Rogue One,” the latest film set in a galaxy far, far away, boasts a wildly varied cast of human actors — Asian, Hispanic, African-American, Pakistani.

And in this fraught political moment, such refreshing diversity comes across as a rebuke to President-elect Donald Trump’s campaign.
As if to heighten the contrast, the leaders of the Empire — who include a brilliant CGI rendering of actor Peter Cushing, who died in 1994 and appeared in the original “Star Wars” — are all preening Caucasian imperialists; you can imagine them goose-stepping around their space ships.
The Empire thinks YOU ARE the Imperialists because you’re the Racist, Sexist, homophobic, islamophobic, evil arseholes!

Will we be brave enough to fly down that trench and take that shot to end the Imperial threat and fight the forces of Darkness for the chance at Freedom?

Or just give into the Elitist Dark Side? The Force is strong with them.

CNN: So it’s highly unlikely the filmmakers were thinking of Trump when they made “Rogue One.”

Especially since the Left was very narcissistic and over-confident  assuming Hillary was going to win and had no concept that a band of Rebels could take them down- up until late into the night on November 8th when The Rebellion hit them in their trenches and scored a direct hit on that 2 meter wamprat hole in their Blue Wall.

But its appearance in theaters just one month before Trump assumes the presidency is the height of irony  (You won’t have said that if all your Imperial Plans for Darth Clinton had worked out so)— an inclusive piece of work that is a slap in the face to the least inclusive president in modern history.

(And he hasn’t even taken office yet!!)

“Inclusive” (aka discriminate against White Males at all costs) is after all, the all-in point for The Dark Side of The Force. You must submit or else!

This the Empire that must be fought. They don’t even conceive that THEY ARE the Empire to begin with, just like the Imperials in the movie.

They are so narcissistic about their superiority they are blinded by The Dark Side.

Paul Ryan& The RINOs: I find your lack of Faith disturbing. 🙂

So it’s onto an new Chapter in the Saga,  “A New Hope”  but will the “Empire Strike Back”… 🙂



Way Back

Let’s hop in the way-back machine for a minute, shall we? We don’t need to go far … just a few months back to be exact.

It was a different time. Hairstyles were different. Fashion was different. Kids were listening to a different type of music their parents couldn’t understand. It was a crazy time. It also was a time marked by the Democratic Party insisting that what made this country great was the “peaceful transition of power.” 

Like I said, it was a different time.

When the Democrats in their narcissism were so sure they were going to win that they took their eye of the ball and got hit by the foulest of balls.

It was Oct. 19 when Donald Trump would not give in to Chris Wallace, the moderator of the final presidential debate, on the question of whether he would accept the results of the election. In the few remaining weeks of the campaign, that became one of the most talked about moments of the entire years-long ordeal. Little did we know that moment would come into play more than a month after all the votes were counted.

They were obsessed by it. It was their happy place. Look Trump will fight us when we win. How joyous is that. We can play he’s a “sexist” and  “unstable” 24/7 for the next few years. We’ve stuck a gold mine of  Fake News “journalism”. They were happier than a pig is slop. Donald Trump was going to contest Queen Hillary obvious victory and they could make hay out of it for months, possibly even years. Oh it was so delicious.

Then they found out it was Fool’s gold and they were really, really pissed!

Hillary Clinton wasn’t asked the question herself, but she never stopped feigning outrage from that moment forward at the concept. Not to the concept of her team committing the very offense which so horrified her, but to the idea there was any circumstance under which the oafish Trump would not bow down and admit her superiority to the world.

They are after all, Homo Superior Liberalis. How could such a Neanderthal beat them.


Of course, it was Hillary who, on election night, refused to concede to the clear victor. Few could blame her for needing a couple of hours to soak in the fact that she’d duffed a tap-in putt on the 18th hole in The Masters and would not be sliding into the Green Jacket. When your dream slips away for a second and final time, it’s understandable composure would elude you.

Especially,w hen you’ve spend years scheming, plotting, and spending over a billion $$ to rig it in your favor!!! Only to have a neanderthal steal it from you.

That’s just not how the Liberal Universe works. I want what I want when I want it and you’re supposed to give it to me because I’m just so much better than you!

 Pulling Herself together, she did admit defeat the next morning, but she and her team don’t seem to have accepted it.

In the ensuing weeks there has been nary a Clinton campaign veteran who hasn’t made a grousing public statement or bitter, unfounded accusation about how a “rigged election” denied the queen her throne.

FBI Director James Comey’s two letters cost her votes; sexism denied Clinton the White House; the Russians interfered with the election. You name, they’ve blamed it.

Global Warming? Women being to “manly”, ad nauseum.

How could they lose to a grubby little troll? They are the Superior Lifeform!

In all those accusations was an undercurrent of not only denying Donald Trump won but denying his coming presidency its legitimacy. Rooted in all of it, especially the Russian “hacking” story, is a hint of the idea that were it not for nefarious forces, Hillary would be president.

This is also called “poisoning the well”. Like ‘divide and conquer’ (a tried and true Liberal doctrine) it’s a very old tactic.

Poisoning the well (or attempting to poison the well) is a fallacy where irrelevant adverse information about a target is preemptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing everything that the target person is about to say.

The FBI and sexism charges held no water, one having been of her own doing and the other overplayed by her campaign. So those unwilling to accept the constitutional order of things hung their hats on Russia.

The bitter grumblings were just that, grumblings of losers. But when those grumblings came from the mouth of the CIA director, another level was achieved.

Director John Brennan, who ironically voted for the Communist Party candidate for president in 1980, was now pointing an official finger at the Kremlin for interfering with the election.


From there, the White House press secretary reiterated the allegation. Suddenly, the outgoing president, who’d lectured Trump on the importance of respecting the outcomes of elections and how the peaceful transition of power is what separates us from the despotic regimes of the world, became that which he decried only weeks earlier.

Tell a Lie often enough and it can become the truth. Certainly, to the mindless liberal hoards at the very least.

A concerted effort has been launched to convince, coerce and otherwise intimidate Republican electors in the Electoral College to vote for anyone other than Donald Trump. In other words, nearly the entirety of the Democratic Party is not only refusing to accept the results of the election, it’s actively trying to overturn it.

And if The Republican had attempted such a thing with Queen-Elect Hillary the vitriol and the hatred for “sexists” and the  cry to deny  a woman, this woman, as a legitimate President would have deafened the loudest supernova in history.

But you can’t be a liberal, especially a progressive one, without being a hypocrite. It comes as natural as breathing.

The ultimate impact of the 2016 election should be to fully and completely expose just how hypocritical, unhinged and, frankly, dangerous progressives can be when they’re about to lose the last finger of their grip on power.

Just below the surface of every Barack Obama lies a Keith Olbermann. Perhaps not as unstable, but every bit as angry.

Let them throw their tantrum. This attempted bloodless coup will fail, and power will be transferred. But never forget. The next four years undoubtedly will be a constant reminder. Wear your seatbelt. 


Strange Whiteness

 Even more from the “tolerance” and “diversity” crowd.

According to Portland State University Professor’s Rachel Sanders’ “White Privilege” course, “whiteness” must be dismantled if racial justice will ever be achieved.

The course description states that “whiteness is the lynchpin of structures of racial meaning and racial inequality in the United States” and claims that “to preserve whiteness is to preserve racial injustice.”

“To preserve whiteness is to preserve racial injustice.”   

Students taking the course will “endeavor to make whiteness strange.” In order to make whiteness strange, the description says students must “interrogate whiteness as an unstable legal, political, social, and cultural construction.”

The course readings and concepts are drawn, in part, from the field of “critical race theory.” According to Harvard University, critical race theory “combine[s] progressive political struggles for racial justice with critiques of the conventional legal and scholarly norms which are themselves viewed as part of the illegitimate hierarchies that need to be changed.”

The Portland State University course description claims the construction of “whiteness” attaches material and psychological benefits to “individuals who identify, or are identified, as white.”

Students taking the course will also study the literary work of writer Ta-Nehisi Coates, who referred to the 9/11 first responders as “menaces of nature” in his latest book. In addition to reading the work of Mr. Coates, students will consider questions such as “[w]hat is white normativity, and how does it interact with other normative orders, including male normativity and heteronormativity?”

Students will also consider how non-white Americans “experience and negotiate skin privilege and white normativity.”

Portland State University isn’t the only university offering classes in whiteness. The University of Alabama-Birmingham, for example, is offering a course titled “Whiteness Studies” this fall, which “seeks to uncover and de-center the fiction of whiteness.”

Similarly, students at Binghamton University could enroll in “The Social Construction of Whiteness” this fall, which explores “intersections of whiteness and white privilege” and the “scholarly methods used to understand whiteness.”

The University of Southern California also gave students the chance to study whiteness this semester. “Critical Studies in Whiteness,” offered by USC’s graduate school, focuses “on how whiteness operates within specific racial regimes to perpetuate inequality.”

While many schools are offering such courses, there does not appear to be a consensus as to which department is best suited to study “whiteness.” Portland State offers its “White Privilege” course in the university’s Hatfield School of Government, UAB’s “Whiteness Studies” is considered an English class, Binghamton’s “Social Construction of Whiteness” falls under the purview of Women Gender and Sexuality Studies, and USC’s Critical Studies in Whiteness was offered by the American Studies department.

The Portland State University website lists Professor Sanders as an Assistant Professor of Political Science but does not provide any further information.

Portland State University did not respond to Campus Reform’s request for comment.

Good think they aren’t race-obsessed… 🙂

Whiteness Studies

More from the not-racist, tolerant, pot-smoking,diversity crowd.

The University of Colorado at Denver is offering a course called “Problematizing Whiteness: Educating for Racial Justice” during the 2017 spring semester.

The three-credit course fulfills the cultural diversity requirement for students in the School of Education and Human Development, which is advertising the offering by posting flyers around campus and making the syllabus available online for students to view.

The course examines “the plight of people of color AND how Whites are also complicit in a system of race.”

“Critical Whiteness Studies addresses the need for a deeper analysis of race, one that accounts for both sides of the race coin, that of the plight of people of color AND how Whites are also complicit in a system of race,” declares a copy of the syllabus that was provided to Campus Reform. “Therefore, this class takes a deeper look into how race operates within White contexts and how such operations ultimately impacts people of color. By doing so, we bridge how Whites AND people of color can collectively work together towards a racially equitable society.”

The instructor, Dr. Cheryl Matias, also teaches other courses dealing with racial inequities, and has received multiple awards for promoting diversity in academia.

One student, who wishes to remain anonymous, questioned whether the subject matter would actually be productive, telling Campus Reform that “when our University offers classes about ‘problematizing whiteness,’ it is hard to really believe that we [Caucasian male students] are really being the oppressive ones.”

The first assignment for the course is called “Getting Down and Dirty with Whiteness,” and requires students to write a paper answering the question, “what have you learned about whiteness and how does it apply to what you see in life?”

Some of the required readings for the course are Learning to be White, White Out: The Continuing Significance of Racism, and an article titled “Sweet Little (White) Girls”? Sex and Fantasy Across the Color Line and the Contestation of Patriarchal White Supremacy.

The course, which was officially created in May, will be available to undergraduate and graduate students at UC Denver and Metropolitan State during the Spring 2017 semester.

Campus Reform reached out to Matias for comment, as instructed by the flyer, but received an automatic reply stating that she is on leave until the Spring 2017 semester.


Image result for white privilege unpacking the invisible knapsack

For The Tolerance Crowd

I had to unfriend someone during the campaign. They were a Hillary Clinton sycophant (had fan boy pictures of her and Hillary). I unfriended her not because of that though. Because she got mad at me for posting counter-intelligence on her feed. It was her feed and only what SHE WANTED on it was permissible. So, unable to not say something I unfriended her for her own protection.

But, don’t worry, I was unfriended multiple times myself. 🙂

So it’s all “fair”. 🙂

Ten Reasons Left-Wingers Cut Trump Voters from Their Lives  by Dennis Prager
Wouldn’t you avoid an evil person who was deliberately destroying the planet? Many Hillary Clinton voters have ceased communicating with friends, and even family members, who voted for Donald Trump. It is so common that the New York Times published a front-page article on the subject headlined “Political Divide Splits Relationships — and Thanksgiving, Too.” The article begins with three stories: Matthew Horn, a software engineer from Boulder, Colo., canceled Christmas plans with his family in Texas. Nancy Sundin, a social worker in Spokane, Wash., has called off Thanksgiving with her mother and brother. Ruth Dorancy, a software designer in Chicago, decided to move her wedding so that her fiancé’s grandmother and aunt, strong Trump supporters from Florida, could not attend.
The Times acknowledges that this phenomenon is one-sided, saying, “Democrats have dug in their heels, and in some cases are refusing to sit across the table from relatives who voted for President-elect Donald J. Trump.”
ALL HAIL the “tolerance” and “diversity” crowd! 🙂
A number of people who voted for Trump called my show to tell me that their daughters had informed them they would no longer allow their parents to see their grandchildren. And one man sent me an e-mail reporting that his brother-in-law’s mother told him that she “no longer had a son.”
All of this raises an obvious question: Why is this phenomenon of cutting off contact with friends and relatives so one-sided?
Why don’t we hear about conservatives shunning friends and relatives who supported Hillary Clinton?
After all, almost every conservative considered Clinton to be ethically and morally challenged. And most believed that another four years of left-wing rule would complete what Barack Obama promised he would do in 2008 if he were elected president — fundamentally transform the United States of America. In other words, conservatives were not one whit less fearful of Clinton and the Democrats than Democrats were of Trump and Republicans.
Yet virtually no conservatives cut off contact with friends, let alone parents, who supported Clinton.
I did it to an acquaintance (not a friend) for their own benefit. Kind of like quitting before getting fired. I did a Nixon. 🙂
Here are ten reasons left-wingers cut Trump voters from their lives.
1. Just like our universities shut out conservative ideas and speakers, more and more individuals on the left now shut out conservative friends and relatives as well as conservative ideas.
To prevent Thoughtcrimes, to maintain the integrity of the echo chamber they live in because hearing about Trump every day is bad enough on the shield generators.

2. Many, if not most, leftists have been indoctrinated with leftism their entire lives. This is easily shown. There are far more conservatives who read articles, who listen to and watch left-wing broadcasts, and who have studied under left-wing teachers than there are people on the left who have read, listened to, or watched anything of the Right or who have taken classes with conservative instructors. As a result, those on the left really believe that those on the right are all sexist, intolerant, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist, and bigoted. Not to mention misogynistic and transphobic.
I know I am. 🙂
3. Most left-wing positions are emotion-based. That’s a major reason people who hold leftist views will sever relations with people they previously cared for or even loved. Their emotions (in this case, irrational fear and hatred) simply overwhelm them.
“Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.” – Yoda
And who leaves on Fear and Fear Mongering more than a Leftist?
4. Since Karl Marx, leftists have loved ideas more than people. All Trump voters who have been cut off by children, in-laws, and lifelong friends now know how true that is.
Their ideas, that is. The ideas of Homo Superior Liberalis shall not be sullied by Neanderthals, even if they are your friends or relatives.
5. People on the right think that most people on the left are wrong; people on the left think that most people on the right are evil. Decades of labeling conservative positions as “hateful” and labeling conservative individuals as “sexist,” “intolerant,” “xenophobic,” “homophobic,” “racist,” and “bigoted” have had their desired effect.
6. The Left associates human decency not so much with personal integrity as with having correct — i.e. progressive — political positions. Therefore, if you don’t hold progressive positions, you lack decency. Ask your left-wing friends if they’d rather their high-school son or daughter cheat on tests or support Trump.
Homo Superior Liberalis, there’s a reason “Superior” is in the title. 🙂
This is also where logic fails when having a “conversation” with a Leftist. Since they are always correct in their thinking and they are emotional, Logic stands no chance.
7. Most individuals on the left are irreligious, so the commandment “Honor your father and your mother” means nothing to those who have cut off relations with parents because they voted for Trump.
8. Unlike conservatives, politics gives most leftists’ lives meaning. Climate change is a good example. For leftists, fighting carbon emissions means saving human existence on earth. Now, how often does anyone get a chance to literally save the world? Therefore, to most leftists, if you voted for Trump, you have both negated their reason for living and are literally destroying the planet. Why would they have Thanksgiving or Christmas with such a person?
Home Superior Liberalis, we are superior for a reason. 🙂
9. The Left tends toward the totalitarian. (and Authoritarian) And every totalitarian ideology seeks to weaken the bonds between children and parents. The Left seeks to dilute parental authority and replace it with school authority and government authority. So when your children sever their bond with you because you voted for Trump, they are acting like the good totalitarians the Left has molded.
But the problem with Education is not these facts, but a lack of money, especially for Teacher’s whose Union is draconian, authoritarian, and totally Democrat. 🙂
10. While there are kind and mean individuals on both sides of the political spectrum, as a result of all of the above, there are more mean people on the left than on the right. What other word than “mean” would anyone use to describe a daughter who banished her parents from their grandchildren’s lives because of their vote? I wish none of this were true. But there is a way to prove me wrong: Re-friend your friends and relatives who voted for Trump, and tell everyone who has ended relations with family members — especially with parents — to reach out to them and welcome them back into their lives.

Nixon cannot got back to Facebook. 🙂

“Fake News”- Liberal Progressive fear mongering Narrative and anything that doesn’t fit the Progressive Narrative. 🙂

Where Are We Now?

Thomas Sowell: We are now in a kind of political no-man’s-land between an administration on its way out and a new administration taking shape. Predictions are always risky — and nowhere more so than in times like these.

What we can do, however, is assess where we are, and what some of the opportunities and dangers are.

The opportunities are many, which is to say that many things are in desperate need of changing, beginning with rebuilding our dangerously neglected and undermined military forces. The monstrosity of ObamaCare needs to be gotten rid of, not just cosmetically adjusted.

Our fundamental freedoms under the Constitution are at stake in the choice of the next nominee to become a Justice of the closely divided Supreme Court. We need someone with both the depth and the strength to resist the pressures and the temptations that have seduced too many supposedly “conservative” justices, over the years, into betraying Constitutional principles.

The current hysteria over “fake news” — including hysteria by people who have done more than their own fair share of faking news — shows the continuing efforts of the political left to stifle free speech in the country at large, as they already have on academic campuses.

These are just some of the opportunities the incoming administration has, now that the Republicans finally have control of both Houses of Congress and the White House — which is to say, now that they no longer have any excuses for not doing what they said they were going to do, when they were running for election.

Opportunities are of course also challenges, and few of these challenges can be met without paying a price. Will the slim Republican majority in the Senate put bipartisan cooperation ahead of the Constitution, when it comes to choosing a Supreme Court Justice based on principles, rather than on avoiding a nasty fight with the Democrats?

The same question arises when it comes to repealing ObamaCare. Democrats threw bipartisanship to the winds when it came to passing ObamaCare. Republicans who wanted to have an input on this sweeping legislation were bluntly reminded of the outcome of the elections. “I won,” President Obama told them.

Now that the Republicans have won — not only the presidency but also the Congress, as well as most governorships and state legislatures across the country — do they have the guts to do what they were elected to do?

Surely no one can be unaware that one of the reasons why such an unorthodox outsider as Donald Trump won the Republican nomination, and then the election, is that Republican voters were fed up with the repeated betrayals by the Republican establishment, going all the way back to President Bush 41 and his betrayal of his bold assertion: “Read my lips, no new taxes!”

What do we know, at this point, about the people being tapped as nominees for key positions in the incoming Trump administration? By and large, they are of a higher caliber than usual, especially General James N. Mattis who has been selected to become Secretary of Defense.

The love of rhetoric by both the media and Donald Trump has caused General Mattis’ nickname of “Mad Dog Mattis” to become a distraction from the facts about a man of both high intellect and a great concern for the troops he commanded. He has, for example, taken it upon himself to personally visit many families of those who died fighting in the battles he led.

As a personal note, I have had the privilege of having discussions with many military people who have visited the Hoover Institution over the years, and have been impressed with officers of many ranks, including General Mattis. The young officers I have encountered are head and shoulders above so many young people of similar ages who are graduates of even our most prestigious colleges and universities.

The liberal media are already expressing worry about the number of military people being considered for key positions in the new administration. They would be worried about anyone who has not been brainwashed in the political correctness that reigns among the intelligentsia.

The key individual in any administration, however, is the President — and that remains the key mystery in the new administration.

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne


The Irony & The Idiocy

The Irony of 2016: “You don’t like a particular policy or a particular president? Then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election. Push to change it. But don’t break it. Don’t break what our predecessors spent over two centuries building. That’s not being faithful to what this country’s about.”
“we’re not campaigning anymore. The election’s over.”
“We can have a debate about process or we can have a debate about how we’re going to help the American people at this point…And the latter debate is the one I think they care about a little bit more.”
“Elections have consequences.” It’s the political way for winners to tell losers: “Tough luck, you lost. Get over it.”  (All Quotes by Obama).

The  Idiocy.

I think I have a solution for the Illegal Immigration problem because it eliminates one of the big objections to deportation: “Breaking up families”.

We only arrest single White Males or Married Whiten Males who have no children.

Everyone on the Left hates them.

We also have to let out of prison, including Illegal Aliens anyone who fits this description.


We can’t deport Illegal Aliens because of “family”.

The sins of the parents cannot be visited upon the children.

We can’t stop any non-white people (or any minority really) from coming into this country because that’s “racist”. And we Can’t arrest them for the same reason, especially blacks because that very “racist” and “discriminatory”.

We can’t arrest LGBTQ+ because that’s “bigoted”.

We can’t arrest women because that’s “sexist” (and that whole “family” thing).

And we can’t arrest Muslims because that’s “islamophobic”.

So all we have left are White Males. And you exclude the ones with children (“family”) and all you have left are singles and childless White Males.

The scourge of Leftist anyhow, they are already evil, so it works out.

Bonus points if they are Christians too.

So there you have it.

Once you’ve arrested all the White Males who are single (or get divorced) or have no children you have no crime left, (at least none you can arrest anyone for) right?

Problem solved! 🙂