Team Cap

In light of the crap decision by Marvel to decide that Capt. America was a HYDRA agent all along and given the pronounced sanctimony coming from the Left about everything moral so they can destroy it and replace it with Government enforced “morals” and the Thought Police.

Captain Hydra is a nickname given to the Marvel Comics superhero Captain America in the light of the shocking plot twist that Steve Rogers, the original alter ego of Captain America, has long been a covert agent of HYDRA, the terrorist-paramilitary organization, as revealed in the first issue of Marvel’s comic book series Captain America: Steve Rogers released in May 2016.

Team Cap

http://teemine.com/sharon?tid=rtg  (I’m getting nothing but a T-shirt I paid for from this plug)

Captain America is “not just another superhero. He wears the colors of the nation and he’s meant to represent and reflect what the national dialogue is at any given point,” book’s editor, Tom Brevoort said.

That national “dialogue” being that every Liberal whacko idea is good and everything else, especially an old white guy who’s a patriot, is evil and we all just need “tolerance” and “diversity” lessons on the 31 Genders and how not to offend anyone (aka a Liberal).

FUCK THAT!

Oh and didn’t you hear about this one:

The social justice agenda has reared its ugly head yet again and this time it’s a viral stunt asking Marvel to, “Give Captain America a boyfriend”.

(Elsa from “Frozen” is also a target for this lately)

And, of course, if they don’t, they are “anti-gay” “bigots” after all.

That’s your “national dialogue”. Do whatever the looniest Leftist wants or  you’re a “bigot” or a “racist”. End of Discussion.

Do as we say or else!

That’s some “dialogue”.

 

 

 

31 Flavors of “Bigotry”

There will be a test later. Ignorance of Liberal Laws are not permitted. You will be Re-educated. You will comply.

You have no choice. (No “pro-Choice” here). 🙂

gender2

gender

Study up, kids. The New York City Human Rights Commission just released this list of 31 genders that are now granted protected status in the city. 31, like Baskin Robbins, but insane.

Notice options like “pangender,” “femme queen,” and “femme person of transgender experience” on the list. “Gender blender” sounds like the name of – very strange kitchen appliance. All of these, of course, are names and labels invented 84 seconds ago by progressive college professors.

This list reads like cliff notes from a bizarre science fiction novel, but instead it’s a matter of actual government policy and progress doctrine.

We are living in a very confused and idiotic time, folks. And we should be calling this stuff confused and idiotic (and evil and depraved) because anything less is to legitimize the utter indefensible nonsense of progressive gender theory. (Matt Walsh)

The city does not provide definitions of the various gender identities, but TheDaily Caller was able to define several of them from glossaries provided online by the University of Wisconsin and the University of California Berkeley.

So what if you there is not official definition of the terms, you’re a bigot if you don’t know them anyways.

Face it, you’re just a bigot, unless you do everything the Liberals says and thinks without hesitation, deviation or questions of any kind.

End of story

the New York City Commission of Rights released a list of 31 different gender identities that all businesses must recognize or else they risk paying a financial penalty between $125,000 and $250,000. 

When de Blasio originally announced the Gender Identity/Gender Expression Legal Enforcement Guidance in December, individuals such as Michael Silverman, executive director of the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund, saw is as a positive step in the right direction.

“It’s a huge step forward and really catapults New York City to the forefront of the struggle for transgender rights”.

Originally, the guidebook included phrases such as gender, gender identity and gender non-conforming. But the newly released list includes pronouns such as hijra, third sex, non-op, gender gifted, two-spirit and gender bender.

A “gender bender” is someone “who bends, changes, mixes, or combines society’s gender conventions by expressing elements of masculinity and femininity together.” (MRC)

Just as Nick Kangadis puts it –

“If society keeps electing fools like de Blasio, it won’t be long before people begin getting fined for saying the sky is blue because some idiot will say it violates his right to call the sky chartreuse.”

Well, if Big Bother tells you it’s pink with blue polka dots then it’s pink with blue polka dots. End of discussion.

A Liberal is always right. You are always wrong.

Home Superior Liberlis is your Master. You will do as they say,think as they say, when they say it.

End of Discussion.

That is “settled”.

The Commission’s legal guidance on gender identity protections under the NYC Human Rights Law addresses situations in which individuals intentionally and repeatedly target transgender and gender non-conforming people. Accidentally misusing a transgender person’s preferred pronoun is not a violation of the law and will not result in a fine (YET). The Commission issued this guidance last year so that employers and individuals understand what the law says and to ensure that every transgender individual in New York City is treated with the respect and dignity they deserve.

Everyone else, fuck off, you’re all bigots anyways.

At that point, it would be easy for the gender-trans-gifted person to scream harassment. Next thing you know you have an innocent person who has to pay a six-figure fine. Who knows? 

Big Brother Does.

In a world full of mindless followers, the government controls the thoughts and actions of an entire nation. The constant eyes of “big brother” are always watching and if a person does something wrong, thought police jump out from nowhere and arrest him or her.

These people will be eventually literally scared to death of even talking in their sleep and revealing their true feelings which many of them did, and the Thought Police were on them like honey draws flies.

Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.

 

 

Gunning for You

No question, the deterioration of modern society is a subjective thing. What some consider problematic, others cheer. What some see as economic stagnation, others call “recovery summer.” But some things are, or at least should be, beyond refute. They aren’t, not anymore.

Oh nothing is sure anymore, except that5 Government is supposed to run everything about your life from before you were born to well after you die.

They are the only safe bet left, right?  There are no morals orn ethics anymore because if you had nthem you’d be a “hater” or a sanctimonious Leftist who thinks you’re a “hater” because you disagree with them.

Katie Couric, formerly of the Today Show and now apparently host of a web show on Yahoo News (which, seriously … who watches it? Did you even know about it before you read it here?) produced a “documentary” about guns in America.

Much like a Michael Moore “Documentary”, reality does not apply. Agenda does though. And a universe full of Sanctimony.

I know what you’re thinking, “Finally, someone is going to cover the gun issue from a liberal prospective,” right? It’s virgin territory, something leftists have shied away from for years.

The reason “documentary” is in quotes is simple: It was about as close to documenting reality as Michael Moore is to slim. She and filmmaker Stephanie Soechtig knew what they wanted to show, what they wanted the film to “say,” long before they shot their first frame. And you can guess what it was.

After it aired, the Washington Free Beacon reported one pivotal scene wasn’t what it seemed. After the journalist (most known for having a colonoscopy on live TV) asked Second Amendment supporters, “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?” the camera showed participants “sitting silently for nine awkward seconds, unable to provide an answer.” Only that wasn’t what really happened.

“However, raw audio of the interview between Katie Couric and the activists provided to the Washington Free Beacon shows the scene was deceptively edited. Instead of silence, Couric’s question is met immediately with answers from the activists. A back and forth between a number of the league’s members and Couric over the issue of background checks proceeds for more than four minutes after the original question is asked.”

The Free Beacon provides the audio. Go listen for yourself.

What you’ll hear is that Couric’s show perpetrated a fraud – a lie. EPIX, the network that aired the “documentary,” stands behind it because, well, it knew what it was getting when it bought in.

For her part, Soechtig courageously granted multiple interviews to defend her work. Wait, no, she didn’t do that. She released a statement to the Washington Post, not the Free Beacon, which read, in part:

 

“My intention was to provide a pause for the viewer to have a moment to consider this important question before presenting the facts on Americans’ opinions on background checks. I never intended to make anyone look bad and I apologize if anyone felt that way.”

Making people look bad was precisely her intention.

Without question. Job #1 – Check.

She didn’t like the answers she got because they didn’t fit her narrative. She needed the “gun nuts” to have no answer; to be “rubes.” When she didn’t get that, she created it.

Create Ideologically based impression that YOU wanted to: Job #2- Check

For her part, Couric released a statement saying, “I support Stephanie’s statement and am very proud of the film.” Yes, the recipient of countless plaques for her “journalism” stands by the person who apologized to those who “felt” her editing lie made them look the opposite of what really was.

“I’m sorry you feel that way”. But I’m not sorry I did it. Sound Concrite but resolute in your Ideological Sanctimony: Job #3 – Check

(Someone should go back and re-watch Katie’s colonoscopy footage to see if they can spot her integrity, though it’s probably obscured by her head.)

As exposed as Couric, Soechtig and EPIX are now, this all soon will be forgotten and the movie will live on.

Lionized as “greatness” by the chose ideological few. It will be paraded around the ant0-gun leftist crowd as a “crowning achievement” and proof that “they were right”.

The damage will continue to be done as it repeats on cable and finds its way to iTunes, Netflix or wherever it ends up. Unsuspecting viewers who stumble across it will be treated to a deliberate falsehood in perpetuity, but the stories exposing it will slide down the memory hole.

The lie will be told so many times that it will become the truth.

This is what liberals do – they create lies that last forever.

Search the documentary section of iTunes or Netflix, and you’ll find multiple documentaries on every made-up issue the left cares about. Global warming, “income inequality,” Wall Street, Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, food insecurity … you name it, they’ve propagandized it. And unsuspecting people looking to pass some time and learn something will be indoctrinated.

Liberals have always played the long con. They have the patience conservatives lack, which ultimately brings victory to them if only they persist.

True.

Republicans win the House, and we expect to have a conservative agenda enacted the next week. Add a slim majority in the Senate four years later, and we get angrier when Obamacare isn’t repealed while Obama is president. Government never has worked that way – liberals fought for decades to get us where we are now, and we abandon the team the minute the first-round draft pick doesn’t lead us to the Super Bowl.

It’s time conservatives get in the real game, start embracing the mediums we too quickly dismiss as “liberal” and reach out to the unsuspecting middle with some truth in all aspects of the culture. Calling out deception when it occurs is great. Combating it by offering an alternative is better. The best part is we don’t need deceptive editing or lies to make our case.

The choice is simple: Fight fire with fire, or prove ourselves to be as dumb as they think we are. (Derek Hunter)

It’s not like they stop doing it.

safe space2

Preferred American Benefits

  • Illegal Immigrant Posed As Dead Veteran For VA Benefits
  • ARIZONA – Undocumented illegal immigrant Rene Ortiz Quintana stole the identity of a dead solider to get benefits totaling close to $30,000. The 69-year-old Quintana had been using the identity of Ruben J. Gallardo who died in 1994.
  •  

    They say that in October of 2012 he took the identity of Ruben J. Gallardo, a man who has been dead since 1994.

  • According to police the illegal immigrant used the stolen identity to obtain an Arizona identification card, state health card, Phoenix health plan card and a VA choice card (allowing veterans to receive medical care at Non-VA facilities) in addition to social security benefits.

    Quintana received benefits totaling $29,062.19 and has been charged with fraudulent schemes, theft and seven counts of identity theft along with six counts of forgery. Police say Rene Ortiz Quintana has been living illegally in the United States illegally for 50 years.

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hv516cj1fIE

Not a very wealthy one at that.

But I’m probably just being racist… 🙂

 

Good Intentions

Obama, Obama Care, most anything Liberal…

Derek Hunter:

A good idea can change the world; but a good idea that doesn’t work, no matter how well intentioned, can bring it crashing down. Such is the case right now with Theranos, a company that describes itself as “a consumer healthcare technology company.” But much more than a health technology company, Theranos was a media creation.

Theranos was founded in 2003 by Elizabeth Holmes, then a 23-year-old college graduate. Holmes, a brilliant young woman with a dream, was working on technology that could test blood for diseases using only a few drops. If perfected, this could save billions of dollars per year and lower costs for consumers.

Before the product could be proven to work, the value of the company exploded to nearly $9 billion, which turned heads in the media and made Holmes fabulously wealthy and a media darling.

In 2015, Time magazine named Holmes one of the “100 most influential people,” listing her in the “Titans” category alongside the Koch brothers and Apple CEO Tim Cook (also Kanye West and Kim Kardashian, so…)

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who sits on the Theranos board, wrote her Time profile. “Striving for prevention and early detection, she is dedicated to transforming health care around the world,” he wrote. “She manages an expanding global business by the refusal to be daunted by any obstacle.”

Dozens of other media outlets and magazines heaped followed on with glowing profiles. She was smart, rich, attractive, young and dazzling even in Silicon Valley. In other words, a perfect story.

There was just one problem – her technology didn’t work. She was proof that not all dreams come true.

Undeterred, Theranos used the technology to test blood anyway. But recently, it announced it was voiding two years’ worth of test results – results on which hundreds of thousands of medical decisions were based. The test results rendered were all no good, and should be voided retroactively, the company announced.

Elizabeth Holmes was elevated before she had done anything beyond starting to work on an idea. In time, the praise grew, as did the expectations. But no matter how good it all seemed, no one asked the most important question: Does it work.

The media didn’t ask because the story it wanted to tell did not demand it. The media wanted to write about an attractive woman heading a billion-dollar company, so success did not need to precede accomplishment before the trappings of success were heaped on her.

The story of Elizabeth Holmes is a sad one, but it’s not unique. When reporting on business success, the media is more interested in gender than achievement.

The road to Hell is paved with good intentions, Mostly Liberal ones.

Queen Hillary Busted

Low hanging fruit time. Hillary and her Emails were wrong. SURPRISE! 🙂

The State Department Inspector General released a new report Wednesday detailing how former Secretary Hillary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act by deleting thousands of emails, stored on her private server, that she deemed personal before turning remaining emails over the the Department for review and preservation. Details from POLITICO

The State Department inspector general concluded that Hillary Clinton did not comply with the agency’s policies on records, according to a report released to lawmakers on Wednesday that also revealed that Clinton and her top aides chose not to cooperate with the review.

While the report concludes that the agency suffers from “longstanding, systemic weaknesses” with records that “go well beyond the tenure of any one Secretary of State,” it specifically dings Clinton for her exclusive use of private email.

“Therefore, Secretary Clinton should have preserved any Federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records with the related files in the Office of the Secretary,” the report states. “At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not comply with the Department’s policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act.”

The report also notes that she had an “obligation to discuss using her personal email account” but did not get permission from the people who would have needed to approve the technology, who said they would not have done so, if they had been asked.

“According to the current [chief information officer] and assistant secretary for diplomatic security, Secretary Clinton had an obligation to discuss using her personal email account to conduct official business with their offices, who in turn would have attempted to provide her with approved and secured means that met her business needs,” the report reads. “However, according to these officials, [the relevant people] did not — and would not — approve her exclusive reliance on a personal email.”

The watchdog also “found no evidence that the Secretary requested or obtained guidance or approval to conduct official business via a personal email account on her private server.”

The report represents the latest pushback — in this case by a nonpartisan government entity — against her campaign’s claim that she did not break any rules and that her use of a private server was completely allowed.

Clinton Campaign spokesman Brian Fallon in a statement predicted that “political opponents of Hillary Clinton are sure to misrepresent this report for their own partisan purposes,” but argued that “in reality, the Inspector General documents just how consistent her email practices were with those of other Secretaries and senior officials at the State Department who also used personal email.”

Has the counter-spin stop the earth’s rotation yet? But I think her nose is appraoching the edge of the universe though…

Investigators also concluded that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who used a personal email as well, likewise did not follow record keeping laws. However, the report notes significant difference in their circumstances: During Powell’s tenure, State’s capacity to email people outside the department was limited. He said he needed it to reach people who didn’t work at State. The IG also noted that he used email less frequently than Clinton and top technology officials were aware of his personal email use.

2001-2005, technology was different. But that doesn’t matter to Hillary or the Left. I’m surprised they didn’t go after John Jay or Thomas Jefferson…

“It’s clear from the report that the Department could have done a better job preserving emails and records of secretaries of state,” another senior state department official. “The department is much better situated today….This has high-level attention.”

It does now, because of HIllary. 🙂

One employee told investigators that he or she “raised concerns that information sent and received on Secretary Clinton’s account could contain Federal records that needed to be preserved in order to satisfy Federal recordkeeping requirements,” the document states.

But they were told to drop it: “According to the staff member, the Director stated that the Secretary’s personal system had been reviewed and approved by Department legal staff and that the matter was not to be discussed any further. As previously noted, OIG found no evidence that staff in the Office of the Legal Adviser reviewed or approved Secretary Clinton’s personal system.”

A 2012 directory lists John Bentel as the director of the office that handles information technology for the Office of the Secretary. Bentel no longer works for State and has refused to answer Congressional investigators’ questions on this matter.

Which means she bought his silence.

“According to the other [IT] staff member who raised concerns about the server, the Director stated that the mission of S/ES-IRM is to support the Secretary and instructed the staff never to speak of the Secretary’s personal email system again.”

And if Hillary Wins, I wonder who might be Secretary of State? 🙂

“Let’s get separate address or device but I don’t want any risk of the personal being accessible.”— Hillary.

According to the report a non-State adviser to Bill Clinton, who was the original user of the server later taken over by Hillary Clinton, shut down the server in early 2011 because of hacking concerns. While unnamed in the report, previous news reports have identified longtime Clinton staffer and Teneo employee Justin Cooper as the man who registered Clinton’s email address. According to the report, the individual who registered the address was the same person who reported the hacking.

Yeah, the Russians, the Chinese, etc.

Cooper, according to the report, reached out to Huma Abedin on Jan. 9, 2011 to notify her of the hacking problem, an occurrence that happened twice that day. He said he “had to shut down the server because he believed ‘someone was trying to hack us and while they did not get in i didnt [sic] want to let them have the chance to,’” the report says.

“Later that day, the advisor again wrote to the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, ‘We were attacked again so I shut [the server] down for a few min,’” the report reads.

That matter should have been reported, the IG report says, but was not.

“Notification is required when a user suspects compromise of, among other things, a personally owned device containing personally identifiable information,” it says. “However, OIG found no evidence that the Secretary or her staff reported these incidents to computer security personnel or anyone else within the Department.”

State has deemed more than 2,000 of Clinton’s messages as classified, including 22 that were upgraded to the most sensitive national security classification, “top secret.” And the FBI is still probing whether any laws were broken laws by putting classified information at risk — or whether her staff improperly sent sensitive information knowing it wasn’t on a classified system.

At the very least, State’s inspector general says Clinton didn’t do what she was supposed to, though it also notes widespread email issues across the tenures of five secretaries of state, not just Clinton. The report found top staffers frequently used personal emails too.

“OIG recognizes that technology and Department policy have evolved considerably since Secretary Albright’s tenure began in 1997. Nevertheless, the Department generally and the Office of the Secretary in particular have been slow to recognize and to manage effectively the legal requirements and cybersecurity risks associated with electronic data communications, particularly as those risks pertain to its most senior leadership,” the report concluded. “OIG expects that its recommendations will move the Department steps closer to meaningfully addressing these risks.”

Clinton and her allies have contended she did nothing illegal by choosing to set up a private email server and account at her Chappaqua, New York, home, and that she was not trying to evade public records requests. Instead, Clinton has said she was motivated by the desire for convenience, though she has conceded it was not the best choice.

She exploited a weakness and when she got caught playing fast and loose she blamed someone else for it and her Media Allies did to. It was only not “the best choice” because she got caught doing it.

swan

The report gives more details of the under-the-radar work of Clinton’s top technology staffer, Bryan Pagliano, whom she paid to maintain her private email server. State’s chief information officer and deputy chief information officers, Pagliano’s direct bosses, told investigators that he never informed them of his side duties. They “believed that Pagliano’s job functions were limited to supporting mobile computing issues across the entire Department.”

“They told OIG that while they were aware that the Senior Advisor had provided IT support to the Clinton Presidential campaign, they did not know he was providing ongoing support to the Secretary’s email system during working hours,” the report reads.

The top technology officers also told investigators they “questioned whether he could support a private client during work hours, given his capacity as a full-time government employee.”

Pagliano invoked his right to avoid self-incrimination and refused to answer questions on the matter before Congress but received immunity from the FBI to talk about the email arrangement. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have been eager to question him on whether Clinton intentionally used private email because she didn’t want anyone getting access to her messages.

Yes. 🙂

 

 

Another One Bites the dust

There-are-two-genders-anything-else-is-sociopathyThe insanity with transgender restrooms is just getting so out of control that words are barely able to describe it.

Now, a major family amusement park is hopping on board the give-rapists-and-pedophiles-immunity bandwagon and is opening restrooms to all genders.

Robert Gehl reports that since they have not learned the lesson from Target, Hershey Park in Pennsylvania announced they have the same “transgender restroom” policy as the big box store.

The Hershey Company announced their transgender policy on Friday:

 

For decades, Hersheypark has been dedicated to the safety and security of our guest and employees. It is foundational to our brand. Additionally, the Park has and will always strive to accommodate all guests and employees – including members of the LGBT community – to ensure those visiting or working at Hersheypark are comfortable and feel secure. To that end, the Park will continue its practice of treating all guests and employees the same no matter race, ethnicity, sexual identity, etc. Guests and employees may continue to use the restrooms with which they gender-identify, or are welcome to use the many family restrooms available across the destination.

That policy is the same as Target’s which is the subject of a boycott, a petition with more than 1.2 million signatures and stocks that continue to slide.

But don’t worry, as I predicted, Polygamy will next up on the “crisis” list for Liberal need to have a new “civil rights” battle after this one.

It’s on to the next one…

On Facebook, Tyler Harris responded: “Really Hershey? I thought you had more integrity than that. Keep family values and make boys use the boys room and girls use the girls room. No matter what you do you can’t get rid of that Y chromosome.”

Let the Lawsuits fly…. 🙂

 

Is another boycott in the works? We’ll see.