Millennial Socialism

Congratulations Tom DiLorenzo on your new book, The Problem with Socialism!  As the DNC Convention kicks off this week, what a fantastic time to remind people why there are some problems with socialism.  Give us an overview of your book.

The target audience is the millennial generation (and their parents), so many of whom have expressed support for socialism, of all things, with hundreds of thousands of them becoming Bernie Sanders supporters.  This is a shocking development, a quarter of a century after the spectacular worldwide collapse of socialism.  It is the consequence of several decades of extreme political correctness in our educational system where conservatives who might have educated our young people about the reality of socialism have been so effectively censored.

So I’ve written what I believe is a straightforward, easy-to-understand book with sixteen short chapters that explain why “millennials” should not want socialism in their future.  Some of the topics include why socialism makes inequality in society worse; the evils of the bureaucratization of society; the brutal death toll of socialism in the twentieth century; the myth of “successful” Scandinavian socialism; how fascism was a form of socialism; why socialism is far worse for the environment than capitalism; how welfare harms the poor; the destructiveness of the “progressive” income tax; and the second plank of the ten planks in The Communist Manifesto.

So what is the “problem” with socialism?

Where to begin?!  A big problem is that a Pew Foundation poll recently found that 69% of voters under the age of 30 said that they would vote for a socialist for president.

The main problems with socialism is that it will destroy your economic future – and your children’s future; it creates an unjust society where a small political elite enriches itself by imposing a regime of equality of poverty and misery on most everyone else; it has been associated with the worst crimes in human history, as documented in The Black Book of Communism, among other places

The socialist welfare state also harms the poor by destroying their work incentives, crowding out private charities, and causing family break-ups where fathers are replaced by government checks; and it destroys personal freedoms by using governmental force in pursuit of “equality.”  That’s just for starters.

You discuss in your book that politicians, like Bernie Sanders, use Scandinavian socialist political systems as the standard-bearer for ideal socialist societies.  Why is Bernie Sanders wrong?

One of the chapters of my book is entitled “The Myth of ‘Successful Scandinavian Socialism and addresses this question.  The reality is very different from the rhetoric of Bernie Sanders and his political clone Hillary Clinton.

Sweden, for example, was one of the wealthiest countries in the world in the late 19th and early 20th centuries thanks to its large degree of economic freedom and a culture of entrepreneurship and capitalism.  It produced many great inventors and entrepreneurs such as Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite, the people who created Volvo and Saab automobiles, and much more.  Sweden enjoyed the highest per-capita income growth in the world from 1870 to 1950.

But Swedish politicians began experimenting with fascism in the 1930s and then socialism, with the nationalization of many industries, a large welfare state, super-progressive income taxation, and onerous regulation and regimentation of private industry.  Sweden began “eating up” its accumulated capital, created by previous generations of capitalists, so much so that according to the Swedish Economic Association, Sweden did not create a single net new job from 1950 to 2005.

Because of this economic destruction the government resorted to printing massive amounts of money in an attempt to bail itself out, resulting in 500% interest rates. That in turn led to a Thatcher-like revolt that reduced marginal tax rates, privatized many industries, deregulated bank lending, retail, telecommunications, and airlines, and imposed deep spending cuts.  But fifty years of Swedish socialism is hard to recover from: the Swedes still have a per-capita income level that is lower than in Mississippi, our lowest-income state.

So the reality is the opposite of the story told by Bernie Sanders.  It is very telling that when he was recently interviewed by a Latin American journalist from Univision and asked about the economic implosion in “democratic socialist” Venezuela and Argentina he had nothing to say – for the first time in his adult life!

Are you concerned that nine out of ten Millennials who identify as Democrats overwhelmingly supported Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton throughout the Democratic presidential primary?  What can conservatives do to help educate them?

I consider Hillary Clinton to be just as much a socialist a Bernie Sanders is.  The only difference is that she doesn’t use the “S” word.  When Chris Mathews asked her recently what the difference was between a Democrat and a socialist she refused to answer the question.  This leads many to believe that she must think there is no difference.  She and Bernie are ideological soul mates.  After all, she is the author of the failed “Hillarycare,” an attempt to impose Soviet-style central planning on the entire health care sector.

I’m convinced that the vast majority of the millennials who say they support socialism have no idea what it is, and are simply seduced by political demagogues who offer them free stuff.  But when I point out to my students that I do not work for free, and neither does my doctor, so that education and healthcare could not possibly be “free,” they react a bit shocked since no one has ever pointed out to them before that there is no such thing as a free lunch, as the saying goes.

Some of them become resentful or angry that politicians like Sanders tried to make fools of them.  This makes me optimistic that if I put in the hands of conservative college students a book like this, they can use the intellectual ammunition in the book to persuade their classmates that freedom and not socialism should be the wave of their future.  It’s not hard to sell young people on freedom.

What books, authors, or conservative-themed book influenced your political philosophy and outlook on life?

I was an economics major in college and my first major influence was Milton Friedman.  I was very impressed by a book of his collected Newsweek columns from the 1970s entitled “An Economist’s Protest.”  I loved his clear writing and logical thought, and decided that I wanted to be able do what he was doing.

I also discovered The Freeman, the magazine published by the Foundation for Economic Education, and that introduced me to many of the best-known conservative economic and political writers of the time.  I became interested in the ideas of Ludwig von MisesF.A. Hayek, James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock of the “public choice school.”  They were both graduate school professors of mine.  Anyone with this kind of educational background is bound to be a conservative or a libertarian.

I was also influence by “Old Right” writers such as Frank Meyer, Frank Chodorov, John T. Flynn, and H.L. Mencken.  I’ve also been a student of the Jeffersonian tradition of the American founding, reading the writings of Jefferson himself and his intellectual heirs such as John C. Calhoun whose 1850 book, A Disquisition on Government, is one of my favorites.

The DNC Menagerie

menagerie

As part of the 50th Anniversary of “Star Trek” Hillary and the Democrats are going to remake the original Pilot episode.

Part of the original Star Trek series, The Menagerie tells the story of a Star Fleet captain whom a cunning alien race tricks into living with a hideous woman by creating an illusionary reality, in which they are both healthy, beautiful, and romantic.

The 2016 remake of this story by DNC Studios premiered at the Democratic Convention last night, with an updated plot, in which the same illusion expands to the entire audience: the viewers see the hideous woman, played by Hillary Clinton, as healthy, beautiful, and romantic, while her partner, played by Bill Clinton, has always seen her for what she really is but continues to play along out of habit and for the sake of convenience.

The Menagerie makes for a very good take on socialism itself. Spend the rest of your life in a zoo cage where all of your biological needs are taken care of – forgo living the life of a fully realized Man. Trade having a life for simply being alive in the animal sense. No self governance needed or allowed. Just life as an animal in the cage.

It is the temptation written about in ancient epics – give up your life Aeneid and you can stay here on my island with me for eternity… or you can go your way and live free like a Man but only be mortal.

And if you don’t bite into Eden’s Apple you’re a racist and a bigot!

Now you don’t want that Scarlet Letter on you do you?

 

To Not Serve & Disrespect

More for the “tolerance” and “diversity” crowd…

From copblock.com: Recently there has been a rash of people who are fed up with the police state whom have begun using the only position of power they have, in their own workplace, to send a message to cops. While media and political pundits tout the myth of a War on Cops, there is a real battle taking place that is not violent, but the result of a new ideological momentum that thwarts the shackles of authoritarianism. The serfs, as it were, are rising up and refusing to participate. The refusal of service to LEO’s might be one of the most powerful trends yet to surface in the fight against the police state.

So it is of little surprise that those who have been forced into soulless service industry jobs by oligarchal economic paradigms for very little reward are starting to fight back.

Police represent not just a poor return on their forced investment, but are also the whip-bearers working on behalf of the economic powers that have created this endless cycle of consumption for profit. When the working poor pour out into the streets to fight the forces of their oppression, who will be there with rubber bullets, tear gas and paddy wagons…or worse? The police are not just more harsh on you the poorer that you are They are the thin blue line that protects the ruling class by keeping you in your place. Police are the Uncle Toms on the plantation of the modern working poor. They are the sellouts who serve to create a barrier between the few who have us all enslaved on some level.

Someone swallowed a Marxist dictionary… 🙂

MRC and Others: There seems to be a pattern these days. Just Google “police denied service at restaurant” and you’ll get hundreds of thousands of results. On July 14, an officer was denied service at Lucky Teriyaki in Sedro-Woolley, Wash. On July 16, an officer was denied service at a Taco Bell in Phenix City, Ala. On July 19, an officer was denied service at Genghis Grill in Dallas.

A Miramar police officer says he was refused service at a Sunoco service station and convenience store.

Sheriff Reichardt said four Skagit County deputies were finishing up lunch at Lucky’s Teriyaki and as two of them went to pay, the owner came out and asked that they not eat there any more. The deputies said the owner told them the customers didn’t like law enforcement there.

Not believing what he was hearing, Sheriff Reichardt asked his Chief Deputy to go speak to the owner and confirm the story. Sheriff Reichardt said not only did the owner repeat the request, but asked that the Sheriff’s Office spread the word to other law enforcement officers that they were also no long welcome.

Most recently, on Monday, a police officer was denied service in Alexandria, Va., when the chef refused to cook for the uniformed woman.

An Alabama police officer says workers at a fast food restaurant refused to serve him when he went through the drive-thru in his police cruiser. It happened at a Krystal restaurant in Irondale.

The police chief says the officer waited in at the drive-thru window for ten minutes. When no one helped him, the officer went inside to order. But the police chief says the workers who were inside walked away.

The good news is that in each case the owners apologized and pledged their support for the police while the offending employees were fired. But unfortunately, hatred of the police is affecting every aspect of their daily lives.

A Northern Virginia police officer was denied service at a Noodles & Co. in the latest episode of anti-cop animosity at restaurants across the country.

A woman working as a cook Monday night at an Alexandria location told the cashier loud enough for the officer to hear, “You better pull me off the line, because I’m not serving that,” officials with the Alexandria Police Department told WTTG-TV.

The cook motioned at the officer, and she and the cashier started to laugh. The officer, a woman wearing her uniform while standing in line behind a family, simply told them “I guess you don’t want my money,” and left.

She reported the encounter to her supervisor. Noodles & Co. executives announced Wednesday that they had fired two workers over the incident, and APD Chief Earl Cook paid a visit to the Duke St. location of the fast casual noodle chain.

Ohio police officer hospitalized after glass found in sandwich

“These are very difficult times right now in our relations with everyone,” Cook told the TV station. “And to have one of my officers treated in that manner unnecessarily, your first response is anger.”

Representatives for the company said in a statement that they “concluded the two team members in question acted inappropriately and we immediately terminated their employment.” Noodles & Co. executives also apologized “for the inexcusable actions of these individuals” to the officer who tried to eat at the restaurant Monday night, they said.

“Further, we want to extend our apologies to the entire Alexandria Police Department for the comments made by our team member,” Noodles & Co. executives said. “We have the utmost respect for law enforcement officials and value the relationship we have built with the local Alexandria Police Department over the years.”

The encounter followed a series of incidents shortly after the Dallas police ambush involving police officers who felt restaurant customers and staff treated them less than respectfully.

Wash. restaurant owner blames language barrier after banning cops

A Columbus, Ohio officer was hospitalized last week after biting into a sandwich laced with glass at a cafe, though investigators don’t believe the glass was placed there on purpose. Earlier this month, staff at a North Carolina Zaxby’s fried chicken heckled two Cleveland County sheriff’s deputies and covered their food with extra spicy hot sauce.

Alexandria Police Chief Earl Cook visited the business the day after the incident. The department plans to hold a meeting with employees at the eatery.

Alexandria Police Chief Earl Cook visited the business the day after the incident. The department plans to hold a meeting with employees at the eatery.

(FOX 5)

A man at a diner outside Pittsburgh refused to sit next to a group of four police officers eating at the restaurant. One of the officers later paid for the man’s dinner because the officer said he wanted to show the man that “we’re not here to hurt you.”

Back in Virginia, Noodles & Co. managers have agreed to post “Blue Lives Matter” stickers on the front of the business to show support for local officers. APD officials plan to hold a meeting with employees at the eatery, and they posted on Twitter after a user mentioned a possible boycott.

“Please, APD does not support any crime related to this unfortunate incident, or even a boycott,” APD officials said. “Take the high road!”

A McDonald’s worker in Texas was fired Wednesday after refusing to provide service to a police officer, CBS Houston affiliate KHOU-TV reports.

The owners of the McDonald’s franchise in Brenham said the actions of their employee were completely unacceptable, and police said it was the right thing to do.

“Nobody deserves to be treated like that,” Brenham Police Chief Craig Goodman told the station.

Similar incidents have been reported at a Taco Bell in Alabama, a Whataburger in Texas and an Arby’s in Florida.

For an off-duty Brenham police officer, a trip to get a burger and fries with his two children made him a target.

“She said, ‘I’m not going to serve law enforcement,’ and turned away and walked away from him,” said Goodman. “She refused to provide service.”

“The same lady that refused the officer, if somebody breaks into her house, who’s she going to call?” a man asked. “She’s going to call the police department.”

Will they show her the same “courtesy” and refuse service?  🙂

deceive

challenge

Rosa Reversal

The DNC must be so proud…

Organizers of the Black DNC Resistance March in Philadelphia were seen Wednesday on video segregating their protest by ordering white people to the back of the line.

“I need all white people to move to the back – make space because this is a Black Resistance March,” one of the leaders yelled from the bed of a pickup truck. “I need all white people to move to the back and make room for the black and brown brothers and sisters.”

Local media reports the march was organized by a coalition of neighborhood groups including Black Lives Matter Philadelphia.

A Fox News colleague who was reporting on the march said as much as half of the crowd was white.

“What if white people were in Ferguson,” one older white activist could be heard asking.

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics.

The unidentified woman with the megaphone repeatedly told all Caucasian protesters to move.

“You will appropriately take your place in the back of this march because it will be truly led by the black and brown community and that’s it,” she roared.

The edict even applied to journalists covering the demonstration.

“Make room for black media,” she yelled. “White media get to the back. Black media come to the front.”

We apparently live in a nation where one’s place in a protest march is determined by the color of their skin and not the content of their character.

Later that evening, other demonstrators caused mayhem outside the DNC convention hall. Protestors dragged the Israeli flag through the streets – some of the flags were burned.

They even desecrated the Star-Spangled Banner.

Anti-American protesters threw Old Glory on the ground. They stomped on the flag and then set it ablaze.

I can’t even begin to imagine the anti-American hatred they harbor in their hearts. I can’t begin to comprehend their contempt for those who fought and died for the stars and stripes.

How incredibly sad it was to witness such hatred and racism on full display in the City of Brotherly Love.

“White people to the back — Black people to the front.”

I wonder what Rosa Parks would’ve done? (Todd Starnes)

One protester objecting to the racial segregation raised the Rosa Parks incident, but the angry woman did not respond. 

Before the march set off, the woman told white people: ‘Take your rightful position, behind us.’

Standing in front of a black and red anarchist flag, she said: ‘I want to see all of the white folks at the back of the crowd.’

At the same time the woman was making the highly offensive comments, the mothers of several black men shot dead were addressing the convention.  

Trayvon Martin’s mother Sybrina Fulton told Democrats that she supports Hillary Clinton because the presidential nominee ‘is a mother who can assure our movement will succeed’.  (Daily Mail)

Walker Speaks Truth

Whether you like it or not.

Chuck Norris:

This passage from Norris’ op-ed lays out the disastrous consequences of the GOP not uniting in this election:

“If Republicans cannot come together as a unified body, then we most assuredly will lose the presidential election, and, consequently, lose many congressional and Senate seats. The Democrats will then dominate Congress, as well as the presidency, for God only knows how long. And most grievous of all, justice seats on the U.S. Supreme Court will be filled by Hillary’s nominees, and their next decade of decisions will certainly dismantle or destroy what is left of our republic.”

 

Norris was not always a Trump supporter — early in the election and going as far back as the 2008 election, he supported Gov. Mike Huckabee.

“After Mike dropped out, I decided to wait until the people chose the candidate they wanted as their next president. Then, I would wholeheartedly support that candidate, which is now Donald Trump,” Norris wrote.

Norris explains what would likely happen if Republican don’t rally around Trump:

“If reluctant Republicans and other freedom-loving citizens don’t rally now behind GOP nominee Donald Trump, we could elect Hillary by default, or by those who merely stay at home on Election Day.”

For anyone that is concerned about Trump, consider Norris’ words here:

“You can always tell a person’s real character and personhood by those who closely surround him, especially if they’re family. Consider not only how poised and positive Trump’s adult children are but also how much they admire and respect their father. Even the liberal media, with all of its bias against Trump, cannot say a negative thing about how much his children love him, and how much he loves his children.

Do you think that type of family passion and values could really exist without the family’s members knowing Trump is the real deal?”

Now think about the people that Clinton surrounds herself with — if you can stomach it.

Norris quoted these famous words from Benjamin Franklin: “We must all hang together, or most assuredly we will all hang separately.”

Norris ends with a call to everyone to unite behind Trump:

“I would like to encourage every Republican – whether establishment, moderate, liberal or conservative – to come together and unite for the good of our country. Actually, I would like to see independents and Reagan Democrats join us as well to help “Make America Great Again.”

Think Secretary of State Debbie “Does Hillary” Wasserman-Schultz… 🙂

Secretary of Education: Bernie Sanders

Supreme Court Justice Loretta Lynch.

Then tell me voting for Trump is all that bad… (and I’m not his biggest fan either).

Democrats1

selfish

 

Conventional Silliness

We Told You!

The liberal “Democratic” process was rigged like a Third Word Banana Republic Dictatorship!

You Sanders Voters were discounted, disrespected and disregarded.

Bwah hahahahahaahahahhahahahahahahaha

Chanting “Hell No, DNC, we won’t vote for Hillary” and “This is what democracy looks like,” the marchers headed from City Hall down Broad Street, the main north-south artery that leads from the city center to the convention site about 4 miles away. (NBC10)

And the Liberals were playing upt he faked, paid for “violence” and “protests” at then RNC Convention last week when they have REAL protestors on their own door step.

Their corrupt Chairwoman resigns and immediately goes to the head of the Hillary Corruption Team. 🙂

And whose protecting them from the angry masses, but the Cops  AND GUNS the Democrats set the angry masses on!!

The Irony is delicious. (and lost on Liberals BTW).

Bernie Sanders supporters with tape over their mouths reading ‘Silenced By DNC’ stand in the arena.

It’s just way to funny. Like most Liberal failures you just can’t make this stuff up.

20,000 freshly leaked emails reveal resentful disdain toward Sanders, as party favored Clinton long before any votes were cast

FEEL THE BURN!

In its recent leak of 20,000 DNC emails from January 2015 to May 2016, DNC staff discuss how to deal with Bernie Sanders’ popularity as a challenge to Clinton’s candidacy. Instead of treating Sanders as a viable candidate for the Democratic ticket, the DNC worked against him and his campaign to ensure Clinton received the nomination.

One email from DNC Deputy Communications Director Eric Walker to several DNC staffers cites two news articles showing Sanders leading in Rhode Island and the limited number of polling locations in the state: “If she outperforms this polling, the Bernie camp will go nuts and allege misconduct. They’ll probably complain regardless, actually.”

Instead of treating Sanders with impartiality, the DNC exhibits resentful disdain toward him and the thousands of disenfranchised voters he could have brought into the party.

“Wondering if there’s a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess,” wrote DNC Deputy Communications Director Mark Paustenbach to DNC Communications Director Luis Miranda, in response to backlash over DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz shutting off the Sanders campaign’s access to voter database files.

Another chain reveals MSNBC’s Chuck Todd and DNC staff members discussing how to discredit MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski’s call for Wasserman Schultz to resign.

Most of the emails released come from seven prominent DNC staff members: senior adviser Andrew Wright, national finance director Jordon Kaplan, finance chief of staff Scott Comer, Northern California finance director Robert Stowe, finance director of data and strategic initiatives Daniel Parrish, finance director Allen Zachary and Miranda.

The release provides further evidence the DNC broke its own charter violations by favoring Clinton as the Democratic presidential nominee, long before any votes were cast.

Over the past several weeks, Guccifer 2.0 released several internal memos showing DNC staff strategizing to make Clinton the presidential nominee—as early as March 2015. In June 2016, Florida-based law firm, Beck & Lee, filed a class action lawsuit against Wasserman Schultz and the DNC based on the revelations from these leaked files.

Other emails show DNC staff in damage control over allegations from the Sanders campaign, when a report—corroborated by a Politico—revealed the DNC’s joint fundraising committee with the Clinton campaign was laundering money to the Clinton campaign instead of fundraising for down-ticket Democrats. Regardless of the fundraising tactics, because both major campaigns didn’t agree to use the joint fundraising committee super-PAC with the DNC, the DNC should have recused itself from participating with just the Clinton campaign.

The Wikileaks and Guccifer 2.0 leaks are the perfect end to a Democratic primary that undermined democracy at every possible opportunity while maintaining plausible deniability.

The party’s rules, including the use of super delegates—who disproportionately endorsed Clinton before the primaries began—are intended to provide the Democratic Party leverage over the election process. Throughout the primaries, decisions were made by DNC officials to help Clinton build and maintain a lead over Sanders.

More votes were cast for Clinton, but they were cast at the behest of a Democratic Party that downplayed her shortfalls to the extent that Sanders not only had to run against Clinton but also against the entire Democratic Establishment. Heading into the Democratic National Convention, voters are beginning to understand that their voices are of little concern to the leadership. (Observer)

Naturally, The DNC doesn’t take responsibility for it, even though Debbie Does Hillary resigned as a sacrificial fake out.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign has accused Russia of meddling in the 2016 presidential election, saying its hackers stole Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails and released them to foment disunity in the party and aid Donald Trump. (From Hillary’s Private Server maybe? 🙂 )

Clinton’s campaign manager, Robby Mook, said on Sunday that “experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke into the DNC, stole these emails, [and are] releasing these emails for the purpose of helping Donald Trump”.

“I don’t think it’s coincidental that these emails are being released on the eve of our convention here,” he told CNN’s State of the Union, alluding to the party’s four-day exercise in unification which is set to take place this week in Philadelphia.

“This isn’t my assertion,” Mook said. “This is what experts are telling us.”

In a statement, the Clinton campaign repeated the accusation: “This is further evidence the Russian government is trying to influence the outcome of the election.” (UK Guardian)

So fellow Communist Elitists want Trump to win?

I’m confused. 🙂

The New Declaration of Dependence

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and The Constitution entitle them, an indecent disrespect to the opinions of mankind requires
that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that some are more equal than others, that they are endowed by their Government with Rights granted by them, that among these are Diversity, Slavery and the pursuit of Control both physical and mental–That to secure these rights, Governments are controlled among Man, deriving their unjust powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Control, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should be changed for acceptable and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute

Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to consecreate for all time such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these people;and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of The United States of America is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States and We The People, of these United States, willingly and with great enthusiasm do swear our fealty and dedicate our children to this most just act.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for more in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated victory. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.And we now celebrate that consecration. For we are not a free people. We are a fair people. A Diverse People. We are Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety and secure Social Justice for all.

That these United States are, and of Right ought to be Enslaved and Dependent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the Constitution, and that all political connection between them and the United States of America, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Enslaved and Dependent States, they have full Power to levy Privilege, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Socialism, and to do all other Acts and Things which
Dependent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection  of Government Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Insincerely,

John T. Wheeler, American. 🙂

 

Pro-Choice

12th-doctor-quote

Derek Hunter: Do you want to be punched in the face or the gut? Would you rather be pushed down a flight of stairs or thrown off a garage? Would you rather vote for Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump?

Most Americans have decided who they are voting for, but those who haven’t must wonder if they’re trapped between an island of poisonous snakes and an ocean of sharks when it comes to their choice for president.

Hillary Clinton is a corrupt, power-mad, money-hungry, career climber willing to do or say anything to obtain what she wants. She sells access, influence and anything not nailed down, as long as there’s nothing in writing. She’ll trample anyone, destroy anyone, forsake anyone to win.

Donald Trump is a blowhard narcissist with no core values or principles in the political arena. A man who buys influence and funds anyone if it serves his purposes at the moment. He’s easily distracted and holds a grudge long after victory.

Hillary is married to a serial philanderer; Trump is a serial philanderer. The only difference is Trump’s conquests were willing; some of Bill Clinton’s weren’t.

Hillary smeared and destroyed the lives of women her husband used; Trump dated or married them.

Neither are moral people.

One would ruin the country by continuing the failed progressive policies and animosity toward the Constitution of the past eight years; the other would ruin the country with protectionist economics and constitutional ignorance.

Trump just accepted the Republican nomination in Cleveland –a festive event which should have launched his general election bid and turned the focus to Clinton and the difference between their visions for the future. Instead, less than 12 hours after accepting the nod, he focused on Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, taking petty swipes and rehashing smears on his family.

If Donald Trump would learn to ignore his instincts when it comes to settling scores with other Republicans, he could win this thing. But he’s his own worst enemy. You don’t curse at the people in the rear view mirror; you go after the battle ahead.

Yet Trump simply seems incapable of moving past anything. Winning wasn’t enough, accepting the nomination wasn’t enough. Trump lied about Cruz’s speech, saying the senator had ad libbed lines not in the submitted text. But all the words Cruz spoke were in the script and on the teleprompter.

So why tell such an easily disprovable lie about someone you’ve spent that last six months referring to as ‘Lying Ted?’

Hillary, on the other hand, lies not only about things that matter, such as emails and classified material, she also has a history of lying about things that don’t matter. Claiming to have landed in Bosnia under sniper fire, recounting in specific detail how she had to run from the tarmac at the airport, knowing there was video of her smiling, greeted by children and accompanied by her own daughter. Recounting the story of how she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, the first man to climb Mt. Everest, even though she was born long before he had set foot on the mountain or become famous.

She’s so weak a candidate that even though she served as secretary of state, she had to choose a running mate, Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., who could shore up her foreign policy credentials. She couldn’t even trust her longtime bagman and now-governor of Virginia, Terry McAuliffe, to deliver his purple state.

Both candidates inspire fierce loyalty in their die-hard supporters, but neither has demonstrated the ability to reach beyond it. Hillary is a known commodity – the Edsel of candidates – and there’s no polishing that mess. The undecideds have decided they can only vote for her by voting against someone else.

Donald Trump is that someone else. He’s known – he’s been a celebrity since the 1980s – but his political beliefs were (and to a large extent remain a) mystery. The country spent a week trying to unravel that mystery, then the next day he focuses on attacking someone he’d already beaten. Four days of forward-looking talk undone by an obsession on unimportance.

If you told me both were trying to lose, I’d be inclined to believe you.

Barring a major change by one of these two people, November could see extremely low turnout as this election devolves fully from a battle for the future to a race to be the least unpopular.

Prayer Day

Our Government, which art in Washington,
Hallowed be thy Name.
Thy Kingdom come.
Thy will be done in Washington,
As it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread (food stamps, welfare, unemployment,entitlements…).
And forgive us our successes without you,
As we Don’t forgive them that disagree with us.
And lead us not into temptation,
But deliver us from evil capitalism
For thine is the kingdom,
The power, and the glory,
For ever and ever.

Amen.

Oh, Danny Boy…

I love Dan Ackroyd, the actor who has done such amazing comedic work.

But Dan Ackroyd, the Liberal is a total disaster.

As I have complained about the Reboot Ghostbusters being a Politically correct hack with SNL comedians I don’t find funny (unlike the original).

Well, this didn’t help any.

But the Liberal intelligensia and Press LOVE HIM for it.

That’s “tolerance” for ya…

Dan Aykroyd: Leslie Jones’ critics are racist, unemployed and ‘obese’ Donald Trump voters

‘They can probably barely pay for the Wi-Fi they’re using’

Dan Aykroyd is blaming the departure from Twitter by “Ghostbusters” star Leslie Jones on “millions” of allegedly racist Donald Trump voters.

But I’m sure he has nothing but praise for the “banning for life” of Conservative Milo Yiannopoulos because after all that was just “hate”speech right?

A man who lives by words should be smarter than that.

Leslie Jones told fans on Monday that she was leaving Twitter with “tears and a very sad heart” because of racists messages she received on the social media platform. Mr. Aykroyd told Entertainment Weekly Canada on Tuesday that he blames “millions” of Klu Klux Klan members who he speculated will back Mr. Trump’s Republican presidential campaign.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, a liberal nonprofit organization, estimates the KKK’s membership includes between 5,000 and 8,000 people.

“These people, first of all, they’re insignificant gnats, they’re losers, they have no lives of their own,” said the “Ghostbusters” producer and cast member of the 1984 original movie. “They can probably barely pay for the Wi-Fi they’re using — probably no jobs. I would say you’re looking at obese white men between 50 and 60 who are active Klan members or member of the Aryan Nation and there are millions of them.”

Mr. Aykroyd said he was “afraid to say that that contingency will be voting for the Republican ticket,” even if Mr. Trump is not “as racist” as his supporter

Leslie Jones told fans on Monday that she was leaving Twitter with “tears and a very sad heart” because of racists messages she received on the social media platform. Mr. Aykroyd told Entertainment Weekly Canada on Tuesday that he blames “millions” of Klu Klux Klan members who he speculated will back Mr. Trump’s Republican presidential campaign.

“These people, first of all, they’re insignificant gnats, they’re losers, they have no lives of their own,” said the “Ghostbusters” producer and cast member of the 1984 original movie. “They can probably barely pay for the Wi-Fi they’re using — probably no jobs. I would say you’re looking at obese white men between 50 and 60 who are active Klan members or member of the Aryan Nation and there are millions of them.”

Mr. Aykroyd said he was “afraid to say that that contingency will be voting for the Republican ticket,” even if Mr. Trump is not “as racist” as his supporters.

Twitter banned conservative pundit Milo Yiannopoulos due to his recent interactions with Ms. Jones, but the Breitbart News technology editor did not say anything racist. He was seemingly given a lifetime ban for the rhetoric of others.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, a liberal nonprofit organization, estimates the KKK’s membership includes between 5,000 and 8,000 people.

“The more I ponder it, the worse this scenario plays out,” box-office analyst Jeff Bock told The Hollywood Reporter on Monday. “Curiosity played a big factor in the $46 million debut and, as such, I doubt it will hold like a typical Feig comedy. In fact, I think it’s going to drop big-time when ‘Star Trek Beyond’ and ‘Ice Age: Collision Course’ open next week.” (WT)

I saw “Star Trek: Beyond” at a Preview Wednesday. It is the best of the JJ Abrams movies.

It was very good entertainment. Excellent Characters.

I’m going to see AGAIN to tonight. In IMAX.

Maybe Ice Age this week end or next.

I’m excited by them.

I doubt I will ever see this abomination and Dannie Boy hasn’t encouraged me to do so.

what do

Brought to you by The Democrats.

response.jpg

star trek

Ideological Crisis

We don’t have a racial crisis in this country. We have an Ideological Crisis.

Caused by The Democrat Party, and Liberalism in general.

Period.

They are at War with US, and we aren’t at War with them.

‘Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps,’- by Burgess Owens

Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps documents the role of the 21 white, self-avowed socialist, atheist and  Marxist founders of the NAACP and their impact on the Black community’s present status at the top of our nations misery index.  It highlights the decades of anti-Black legislation supported by liberal black leaders who prioritized class over race in their zeal for the promises of socialism. Their anti-Black legislation, dating back with the 1932 Davis-Bacon Act, continues today to suppress inter-community Black capitalism, federal construction related Black employment, work and job experience for Black teenagers, quality education access for urban black children, and the role of black men as leaders within the family unit.

Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps highlights the strategy, used in 1910, to inject the atheist ideology of socialism into a once enterprising, self-sufficient, competitive and proud Christian black community. A portion of that community, the conservative Black middle class, is positioned to pull our nation back from this abyss.

Americans can ensure that the century-long sacrifice of lost hopes, dreams and lives made by the proud, courageous, patriotic, capitalist, Christian based, self-sufficient, education-seeking Black community of the early 1900s was not in vain—but only if we choose to learn lessons from those past Black generations.

 

ginsburg

One Nation Divided

We seem to have quite a few “brain-dead” folks out there in cyber-space. Especially on Twitter. Which is probably why I don’t Tweet.

The latest appears to be Kalen Rahim who definitely has a few brain cells missing after she actually tweeted “All you Worcester gangsters and what not. You clearly have a mission on Wednesday. Kill Donald Trump.”

A local blog, TurtleBoy Sports posted an article about disrupting a scheduled Trump event in Worcester. “The Donald was scheduled to speak to yet another standing-room only crowd, with another 3,000 outside who just couldn’t fit, which prompted Rahim’s stupid “assassination” threat, and which ultimately got back to her employer, Explore Talent, who gave her the boot, firing her from her job.

However as stated this young lady has more than a few “brain cells” missing and of course one stupid act, apparently isn’t enough therefore another is required by actually calling the police to complain about her firing, and apparently wanted to file some type of complaint…really!

Obviously it never dawned on Kalen that making an assassination threat on a presidential candidate is a federal crime, punishable by lots and lots of years in prison.

It was also revealed that Rahim has been involved in “Black Lives Matter” protests in Massachusetts and elsewhere over the past year, and perhaps that should explain the reason for those missing “brain-cells”. (Washington Weekly)

I’m sure she can get a nice cushy job being a paid protestor and agitator. Make her parents proud and she can ACT like a spoiled brat.

Steve Crowder:

Dear Black Lives Matter and all of its racist, anti-cop, fact-hating constituents…

Where does one even begin when it comes to pointing out your hateful suckage? We could start with your support of white genocide (see Black Lives Matter Founder Tweets About ‘Killing White Folk.’ and #BlackLivesMatter Idiot Caught Tweeting ‘Master Plan’… About Killing All Whites). Or your chilling desire to re-segregate the populace. Is it any wonder that over 100k people have desperately implored the White House to label you a terrorist group? You’ve already given us plenty of proof of your racism, but that’s old news. It’s your cop-killing rhetoric that’s becoming the real problem here.

In the past month alone there’ve been multiple organized attacks on police. First there was Dallas, then there was Baton Rouge, and then there was Baton Rouge… again. Two separate incidents connected by the same moronic, violent ideology. An ideology with which I’m sure you’re well acquainted. See, it’s Black Lives Matter who resorts to violence in times of distress. Ever notice how your “peaceful protests” end in riots and death? You’re the ones breaking windows and tossing flaming dumpsters through your neighbors shops every time you get angry. You’re the ones sniping cops when a trial doesn’t go the way you think it ought to. Because #HandsUpDontShoot… Unless you’re wearing a badge. Isn’t that right?

OH, and the BLM activists who think the Dallas shooter is a Hero for killing White Cops. Yeah, that shows your “tolerance” and “compassion”

Does it sound like I’m pinning the blame for these deaths squarely on your shoulders? That’s because I am. It’s you, Black Lives Matter, who has taken the rare actions of a few and applied them to a whole. Among educated groups, we call that “generalizing.” You’d likely more easily recognize it as “prejudice.” Remember that word?

ThatWord

You saw the deaths of Freddie Gray ( 4 Cops acquitted so far) and Philando Castile and were frustrated. Was there room to be? Sure. But you didn’t wait for the facts. Instead, you flew off the handle, shouting from the rooftops that all police are racist. That they cannot be trusted. That they must be brought to justice. When justice was served in a real court of law however, you said it wasn’t justice at all. So guess what happened next? They were “brought to justice.” Your way. Just like you wanted.

 

To us “racist” non-police-hating folk, that phrase doesn’t sit well. See, for us, justice doesn’t equate to murdering innocent people. That’s something you claim to believe too. But shhhh, not really. 😉

The thing is, you’ve picked a niche issue to be upset about and ignored a plethora of other equally relevant statistics. You know, like the fact that black men kill over 4,000 other black men annually. No justice, no peace, right? Well… no facts, no argument.

While you’re busy picketing for pedophiles, people (police) are being unfairly targeted because of the generalizations lobbed at them by… you. Say, isn’t that exactly what you’re supposed to be outraged about?

ElmoShrug GIF

We’re beyond the niceties of giving you the benefit of doubt. No more games. You gave the police an ultimatum: you’re either for #BlackLives or you’re against them. Law enforcement didn’t give you the answer you wanted. The result? More dead cops, with the body count still growing as each day passes. So here’s your ultimatum, Black Lives Matter: you’re either for peace or you’re against it. So far… it’s looking like you’re against it. Queue riots and dumpster fires.

Are you angry yet? Good. You should be. But not with me. You should be furious with your peers. They made your group look like a bunch of one dimensional, raging, mouth-breathing troglodytes. Also, be angry with yourself. For letting them. You’re the ones who stood (and are still standing) in solidarity with murderers after the fact. You let the Dallas shooter – and the Baton Rouge killer – use your identity, and your mission, to murder. Afterwards? Nary a protest to be seen for the dead cops. Not even the black one.

If you can flood the streets with protestors and rioters and block highways for unfortunately slain criminals… why can’t you even cobble together a vigil for one cop? One dead, black cop.

50 years from now people will look back on the BLM movement as a black dot in the books of American history. You will be an unfortunate footnote, a stepping stone in the way of true American progress. Hm. Maybe there will be some justice after all?

The president of Black Lawyers for Justice — who’s a former leader of the New Black Panther Party, Malik Shabazz:

Megan Kelly asked Shabazz if he thinks white people are “inherently evil.”

He replied that “your policies and your actions are evil.”

MLK he is not. More Malcolm X or worse…

The first African-American woman to be crowned Miss Alabama stirred up a lot of controversy when she called the man who shot and killed five Dallas police officers a “martyr.”

“I’m dealing with a bit of guilt,” she said, because “I value human life. and I want to feel sad for them, but I can’t help but feeling like the shooter was a martyr.”

According to police, 34-year-old Kurt Vanzuuk of Norwalk posted on his Facebook page that the Dallas shooter was a hero. Police say the post also called for police officers to be killed.

So, yeah, I’m sympathetic… 🙂

divided

none of my business

It’s Your Fault

Liberals are infamous for having the victim blame the perp if it suits their agenda. But now you have the victim as the self-fulfilling perp, because of the Liberal agenda.

The reason cops are being assassinated on an ever increasing scale is not because Obama and The Liberal Left started a Race War and used Cops as their target monkeys, oh no, it’s because the Cops themselves are to blame!

Seriously.

Fielding a question on Sunday, July 10, about the violence against police in Dallas, Texas last week, which left five officers dead, Obama said police officers will be safer once they acknowledge their failures:

“There are legitimate issues that have been raised, and there’s data and evidence to back up the concerns that are being expressed by these protesters.

“And if police organizations and departments acknowledge that there’s a problem and there’s an issue, then that, too, is going to contribute to real solutions. And, as I said yesterday, that is what’s going to ultimately help make the job of being a cop a lot safer. It is in the interest of police officers that their communities trust them and that the kind of rancor and suspicion that exists right now is alleviated.”

Wow.

Then he said we should end “divisive rhetoric” (aka just stop disagreeing with him and accept your fate)

“Everyone, right now: focus on words and actions that can unite this country rather than divide it further,” he said. “We don’t need inflammatory rhetoric. We don’t need careless accusations thrown around to score political points or to advance an agenda. We need to temper our words and open our hearts ― all of us.”

It would be nice if the President followed his own advice. But he’s too busy with HIS Agenda as always.

http://walshfreedom.com/video-black-lives-matter-activist-shouts-kill-all-white-babies/

“If police organizations and departments acknowledge that there’s a problem and there’s an issue, then that, too, is going to contribute to real solutions,” Obama said. “And, as I said yesterday, that is what’s going to ultimately help make the job of being a cop a lot safer.” Eight cops have been killed in anti-police attacks in the past 10 days, including five officers in Dallas, Texas.

The president also took the opportunity to praise Black Lives Matter; the group cited by Dallas cop-killer Micah Johnson as part of his inspiration. In his statement, he comparing the group to abolitionists and advocates of women’s suffrage.

“The abolition movement was contentious. The effort for women to get the right to vote was contentious and messy,” the president said. “There were times when activists might have engaged in rhetoric that was overheated and occasionally counterproductive. But the point was to raise issues so that we, as a society, could grapple with it. The same was true with the Civil Rights Movement, the union movement, the environmental movement, the anti-war movement during Vietnam. And I think what you’re seeing now is part of that longstanding tradition.”

Yes, BLM is the “Civil Right Movement”. Dr Martin Luther King is truly dead now.

Now, Mr. president what we are seeing is the Race War Liberals started at least 2-3 generations ago for their own Political Ideology and need for power.

Obama is simply the culmination of it.

Yes, it’s YOUR fault, say the President. White People and Cops caused this!

Seriously sick ideology. And the Leftist Media and the sheeple are on board with it.

“We don’t need inflammatory rhetoric. We don’t need careless accusations thrown around to score political points or to advance an agenda. We need to temper our words and open our hearts … all of us,” Obama said.

Orwell is frightened of you, my son. You have exceeded his expectations.

what do

But it’s not their fault. It’s yours…Brought to you by The Democrat Party since the 1860’s.

 

 

 

Coup Me In

Well, at least one of the Black Lives Matters egotistical loons up the ante on their need to crush White People in the name of “tolerance”.

He wants a Coup de-tat if he doesn’t get the right person for President (guess who). No moving to Canada for him…

From RedAlertPolitcs:

Image via Linkdin

The failed coup in Turkey that killed more than 200 people and wounded thousands more could be coming to America — if Donald Trump is elected and #BlackLivesMatter activist and Daily News columnist Shaun King has his way.

King tweeted this weekend that the U.S. would suffer the same fate as Turkey if the soon-to-be Republican nominee won the presidency.

“If Donald Trump becomes President, you are fooling yourself if you think we’re far from having a coup our own selves,” King tweeted. “I’m dead serious.”

Screen Shot 2016-07-16 at 8.05.08 PMThis isn’t the first time King has said a President Trump could lead to violence. In a May 9 article in the Daily News, the activist stated that anarchists might vote for the billionaire because his presidency would result in a civil war.

It’s strange that a movement that claims they want to fight injustice peacefully has a spokesman who repeatedly fantasizing about civil wars and uprisings which would lead to death and destruction.

Yeah, these guys aren’t so much MLK as Malcolm X or worse.

No, “We shall overcome”. More, we will kill you if you don’t.
Nice.
Tolerant. Peace. Love. Diversity…
Aren’t they?
And we know Leadership will not acquiesce to these thugs, right?
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, center, speaks to media as he is joined by from left, Rashad Robinson, Executive Director, Color of Change, Mica Grimm, Activist, Black Lives Matter Minnesota, Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck, Dawn Collins, Community Organizer, Baton Rogue, Al Sharpton, and Cornell Brooks, President of the NAACP, outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, July 13, 2016, after meeting with President Barack Obama about community policing and criminal justice with a group made of activists, civil rights, faith, law enforcement and elected leaders. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, center, speaks to media as he is joined by from left, Rashad Robinson, Executive Director, Color of Change, Mica Grimm, Activist, Black Lives Matter Minnesota, Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck, Dawn Collins, Community Organizer, Baton Rogue, Al Sharpton, and Cornell Brooks, President of the NAACP, outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, July 13, 2016, after meeting with President Barack Obama about community policing and criminal justice with a group made of activists, civil rights, faith, law enforcement and elected leaders. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

President Obama could be working to unite all races, but beyond his reminders for the movement “to maintain a respectful, thoughtful tone,” he is supporting the divisive Black Lives Matter movement by rewarding activists with visits to the White House.

After shutting down I-94 in a St. Paul protest on July 9, Mica Grimm appeared at the White House on Wednesday, The Daily Caller reported.

“We know that we’re at risk just by showing up,” she said. “And that’s why it is so brave, so courageous, and we’re about to make some noise today.” Grimm’s actions date back to 2014 and she described a message with a friend about “tak[ing] over a highway” and how she thought “we should do a die-in on a highway.”

Many protesters yelled “f*ck the police,” including those who cursed at and got physical with a Fox News reporter attempting to ask them why they were there. Grimm herself retweeted the call.

That’s the spirit. That heals the wounds the Liberals have opened up wide.

The Black Lives Matter movement is full of hatred towards whites and police officers, but it’s those who dare to say that “All Lives Matter” who “are part of America’s race problem” according to Michael Tomlin-Crutchfield for The Huffington Post.

“Dear ‘All Lives Matter’ millennials, you are part of America’s race problem. You see, a post-racial society is neither a reality in the United States nor anywhere else in the world. Take a look at the undercurrents of racism and xenophobia sweeping across the world that caused lower income Brits to vote to leave the EU and Austria almost elect a rumored Nazi sympathizer,” he writes.

That Tomlin-Crutchfield makes a plea to call the police on him for walking down the street is understandable. One need not have to sympathize with this request and his point about white people feeling “unsafe” around black men and also support Black Lives Matter, however.

His thoughtful remarks are once again marred by another paragraph. “What I am saying is recognize how the power of your words and your actions have a direct impact on the very lives that you’re tweeting ‘matter.’ Understand how saying “All Lives Matter” makes you compliant with a system that supports those words while writing in the fine print ‘except if you’re black,’” Tomlin-Crutchfield says towards the end.

Shouldn’t he be making a call for those in Black Lives Matter to recognize the power of their words and actions? Or is that too much to ask for?

Excepting Liberals, especially Liberals to recognize that is a Thoughtcrime, so, no it cam’t happen.

It’s “do as I say time”. Self-analysis is a completely foreign concept to the narcissistic little darlings.

Rational Thought is not their strong point.

To borrow Tomlin-Crutchfield’s phrase, one could also say “except if you’re a police officer.” That Black Lives Matter takes issue with “All Lives Matter” is at least a show of honesty. Protesters shut down campus events, call for coups, yell “f*ck the police,” verbally assault students they target for being white, tweet that white and blue lives don’t matter, and tear down police memorial displays. They get away with it while those who dare to take a different stance are the ones punished. (Red Alert).

truth
in common
And all started, run by , and funded by Democrats! 🙂
accurate

Bloody Nose Syndrome

My Man, Derek Hunter: We’re in the midst of a war, but you’d never know it by watching the news or listening to the White House. The JV team keeps piling up bodies and Western leaders continue pledge to stand together as the blood dries. That’s all well and good, but when “standing together” is the entirety of the strategy, winning has not become the priority.

To win a war, to defeat an enemy, you have to first admit you’re in a war and have an enemy. No terrorist attack, no matter the body count or how great the horror, has shaken Western powers into admitting radical Islam is a cancer on humanity and needs to be exterminated. It seems as though nothing will.

What happened in Nice, France, was as evil as it was expected. Where the next attack will be we’ll know soon enough, but it too will be shocking and not surprising. It’s coming because each attack leads to a response along the lines of a mild scolding.

Kinda like Hillary Clinton and The Leftists.

If each time you robbed a bank and got caught you faced only a “It’s wrong that you did that and you shouldn’t do that again,” why would you not rob banks? Now add in the fanatically insane idea that being killed while robbing banks was the key Heaven, and you get Islamofascism.

And out of control Liberal “Activists” and Politicians.

No Discipline.

Yet Western leaders, from President Obama to French President François Hollande, treat this evil as a distraction; a kid kicking your chair on a long flight. But this is one annoyance that will only grow bigger if not stopped.

The Agenda is The Agenda.

Newt Gingrich took a lot of heat for comments he made Thursday night, but he was absolutely correct in his conclusion. “I am sick and tired of being told the wealthiest, most powerful civilization in history, all of Western civilization, is helpless in the face of a group of medieval barbarians who, for example, recently burned 20 young women to death, burned them to death, because they wouldn’t have sex with them. A group which beheaded recently in the Philippines two Canadian businessmen, and we’re told to be reasonable, to be passive, to not judge. I just want to tell you tonight, everybody who watches this video, this is the fault of Western elites who lack the guts to do what is right, to do what is necessary, and to tell us the truth, and that starts with Barack Obama,” he said.

AMEN. But those are his Muslim brothers…

Unfortunately, in the wake of every wholesale slaughter of innocent human beings, “Western elites” circle the wagons of denial and lament the prospect of “blowback” against Muslims that never materializes. It’s like lecturing Jews not to be harsh toward Nazis as they’re being rounded up for shipping to death camps. They aren’t denying reality, they’re ignoring it completely.

Amen!

We aren’t without fault in this, we allow politicians to do it. We allow an unambiguous, self-declared terrorist who murdered 49 people to be spun into a homophobic “gun-nut” by a media we continue to patronize. We’re told how we’re greedy by celebrities we continue to enrich. We’re lectured on how we’re horrible racists by politicians we continue to elect.

We do this to ourselves.

And Millions want to continue it by voting for Hillary and many Republicans (and “elites”) do to. The Republican Convention is going to be more about NOT supporting the people’s nominee than getting more people to vote for them.

Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.

 

It’s not going to change until we change it. Islamofascists will stop murdering people only if they’re dead. We in the civilized world should make them dead. We have the tools, we have right on our side, but those in position to lead do not have the will.

Both ISIS and President Obama want to “fundamentally transform” the world. Only ISIS is willing to destroy it in the process, but Obama simply ignores its destruction in hopes it comes out his way. He’ll use the bodies of their victims to do it when he can, and ignore them when he can’t.  

He’s far to rigid in his ideology. He only sees HIS reality and what HE wants it to be. Nothing else really matters because if the world was the way HE wanted it, it would be Utopia, in his mind.

Rationality nor Reality will change that.

We’re in a war, whether we want it or not, whether our leaders acknowledge it or not. It’s a winnable war, but not if we don’t fight it the way wars have been fought and won since time began.

They were at War with us, but we we weren’t with them — 9/11 Report.

Still true.

 

Radical Islam will always exist, but we must fight to ensure it does so only in the heads of a few afraid for their discovery. We have to fight the war against it like a war; with every weapon at our disposal. Our distaste for casualties has not spared lives. It has only prolonged suffering, and it must be overcome.

Just Like Progressive Liberalism.

That means civilian casualties, and not just on our side, as it has been. That means taking them out wherever they are, no matter who they are with. If you’re having dinner with a terrorist, you are fair game. Regardless whether they’ve engaged in terror, if you sit down with the devil you better be prepared for Hell. And Hell is what we must bring to them.

Amen.

Newt is right – they are barbarians and need to be destroyed. The civilized world has to embrace a little of the incivility which allowed it to defeat evil in the past and thrive if it is to do so again. We must fight like our survival depends on it. Because they will, and it does.

The Visigoths have sacked Rome and The Romans keep asking, “Thank you, Sir. May we have another?”

And the people “vote” for them to continue.

history2

divider

 

Only Black Lives Matter

The egotistical children of Black Lives Matter are all huffy and puffy that some damn terrorists stole THEIR spotlight and your focus on their fragile psyche and egos.

The poor little disturbed darlings.

“Ok I’ve come to the conclusion that what happened in Nice was to make people lose attention off [sic] BlackLivesMatter- and focus and unite against us”, wrote Twitter user Semsa, who is based in London but says “Egypt’s the motherland”. She has since made her account private.

“Don’t #-PrayForNice- we are fighting a civil war against whites. #-BLM”

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/07/13/why-saying-all-lives-matter-opposite-black-lives-matter/87025190/

Saying “all lives matter” is Racist!

So what is it us Honkies have to give up? To Sacrifice?
Money? Power? Freedom? All 3???
Let the “oppressed” Oppress us so they can feel better??? For how long? What would make them happy?
What exactly?

Narcissistic children throwing a tantrum.

The local Fox affiliate in Memphis reported on the story which features the heroic efforts of a paramedic who managed, after nearly 30 minutes of delay, to get the child the care they needed:

The Memphis Black Lives Matter rally shut down the I-40 bridge Sunday night with hundreds of protesters refusing to leave. Traffic could not go across, but paramedic Bobby Harrell with Crittenden EMS was determined to get to a child who was stuck on the bridge with his family.

“We received a call there was a child needing medical attention stuck in traffic up on the bridge and due to the protest going on the bridge the family was not able to get through traffic to get him to Le Bonheur,” Harrell said.

A photo shows parents handing the child off to paramedics on the bridge.

“The sheriff’s department had to escort us up the wrong way of the interstate to the child,” he said.

Harrell said after he had the very sick child in the ambulance, the driver had to go 25 minutes out of the way.

“We had to turn around and come back to West Memphis and cross over at MLK to get over to 55.”

Did you catch that? They crossed over at “MLK” to get the sick child to the hospital. Martin Luther King Blvd. One wonders how Dr. King would react knowing that BLM selfishly prevented a young child from getting medical care in the name of their race-based political cause.

Perhaps the bravest people within this climate of political correctness are those critical thinking individuals, who also just happen to be black, and have the audacity to question both “white privilege” and progressive dogma in public.

If you also happen to be a proud conservative like Condoleeza Rice, Ben Carson and Justice Clarence Thomas, then there’s little doubt you’ll also be tagged as an “uncle Tom.”

So when Wendy Williams decided to apply a little of that critical thinking to Jesse Williams self-serving acceptance speech for his humanitarian award at the BET awards, well one can just imagine the fallout she created.

“You know, on the other hand, I would be really offended if there was a school known as a historically white college. We have historically black colleges. What if there was the National Organization for White People Only? There’s the NAACP. Racism sucks and we can all do better in our own households, educating our children to make to make it better.”

However Wendy wasn’t finished in laying the truth bomb on the politically correct crowd and zeroed in on the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, better known as NAACP, and asking them outright “What is this colored? We’re supposed to be colored?”

In short Williams pointed out to those in attendance, that reverse discrimination, is in fact still “discrimination” no matter how you dress it up…good for you Wendy!

Do you agree with what Wendy Williams has to say about black-only groups being racist?

 

Initiative

WAlter E Williams: President Barack Obama and his first attorney general, Eric Holder, called for an honest conversation about race. Holder even called us “a nation of cowards” because we were unwilling to have a “national conversation” about race. The truth of the matter is there’s been more than a half-century of conversations about race. We do not need more. Instead, black people need to have frank conversations among ourselves, no matter how uncomfortable and embarrassing the topics may be.

Among the nation’s most dangerous cities are Detroit, Chicago, St. Louis, Baltimore, Memphis, Milwaukee, Birmingham, Newark, Cleveland and Philadelphia. These once-thriving cities are in steep decline. What these cities have in common is that they have large black populations. Also, they have been run by Democrats for nearly a half-century, with blacks having significant political power. Other characteristics these cities share are poorly performing and unsafe schools, poor-quality city services, and declining populations.

Each year, more than 7,000 blacks are murdered. That’s a number greater than white and Hispanic murder victims combined. Blacks of all ages are killed at six times the rate of whites and Hispanics combined. According to the FBI, the police kill about 400 people a year; blacks are roughly one-third of that number. In Chicago alone, so far this year, over 2,000 people have been shot, leaving over 320 dead. It’s a similar tale of mayhem in other predominantly black cities.

Heather Mac Donald’s most recent book, “The War on Cops,” points out some devastating and sobering statistics: “Blacks were charged with 62 percent of all robberies, 57 percent of all murders, and 45 percent of all assaults in the 75 largest U.S. counties in 2009, while constituting roughly 15 percent of the population in those counties. From 2005 to 2014, 40 percent of cop-killers were black. Given the racially lopsided nature of gun violence, a 26 percent rate of black victimization by the police is not evidence of bias.”

The primary victims of lawlessness are black people. To address this problem and most others, black people should ignore the liberal agenda. If civil authorities will not do their job of creating a safe environment, then black people should take the initiative. One example comes to mind. In 1988, at the request of residents, black Muslims began to patrol Mayfair Mansions, a drug-infested, gang-ridden, unsafe Washington, D.C., housing project. The gangs and drug lords left. The Nation of Islam sentinels were not deterred by the wishes of politicians and the American Civil Liberties Union. They didn’t feel obliged to give kid glove treatment to criminals. Black residents of crime-infested neighborhoods should set up patrols, armed if necessary, to challenge thugs, gangs, drug dealers and other miscreants and make black neighborhoods safe and respectable. No one should have to live in daily fear for his life and safety. Most Americans have no idea of — and wouldn’t begin to tolerate — the climate of fear and intimidation under which so many black people live.

Without self-initiative, there is not much that can be done about the high crime rate in black neighborhoods. Black and white liberals and their allies in the ACLU, as well as many libertarians, will not countenance the kind of tools needed to bring about civility. For example, the Chicago Police Department recently entered an agreement with the ACLU to record contact cards for all street stops. The ACLU claimed that police were disproportionately targeting minorities for questioning and searches. The practical result will be fewer investigative stops by policemen and more crime, and it will be black residents who suffer.

Black people have the capacity to run the criminals out of their neighborhoods. Let me put the issue another way. Suppose it were the Ku Klux Klan riding through black neighborhoods murdering 7,000 blacks year after year. How many black people would be willing to wait for the Klansmen to behave themselves or accept political promises and wait for a government program?

Dear Kurt

Kurt  Schlichter
Kurt Schlichter

If anyone needs good solid conservative advice, it’s liberals, hipsters and social justice warriors. And I am here for them!

Dear Kurt: I am a 48 year-old progressive, unionized fifth grade teacher who lives alone with her three beloved and diverse kitties, Fluffums, Ticklebunny and Hillary. Lately, I think Ticklebunny, whose coat is a creamy white, has been microaggressing Fluffums, whose coat is a rich ebony. I think Ticklebunny may be racist. Also, every night when I come home with a single serving Trader Joe’s entrée and a bottle of Charles Shaw chardonnay, Hillary is sitting on my computer keyboard and the browser history has been erased. What should I do? Signed, Cat Lives Matter

Dear Spinster: Like most women in Hillary Clinton’s core voter demographic, you are fated to live, and then die alone in your squalid condo, and after death to be consumed by the animals who pretend to love you. But you can change that. Reject every twisted belief you have been misled into embracing and then date a former Marine. Also, Ticklebunny is super racist. He’s the Robert Byrd of tabbies. You can Google that.

Dear Kurt: I saw that in the new Star Trek movie, Sulu is going to be portrayed as gay. Well sure, that’s a start, but I don’t know if I can enjoy a movie where all the other characters identify as cis because it marginalizes my personal struggle as a gender fluid, Klingon-identifying otherkin. What should I do? Signed, “Mr” Spock

Dear Geek: The real problem with Star Trek is the goofy socialism embraced by the whiny space bureaucrat characters. Everyone in these movies is a government flunky working for the “Federation”; is there anyone in the universe with a real job? And the most fantastic element is how they are not only efficient and effective but are also attractive. Look, I can believe in warp drives and Romulans and going back in time to make out with a young, hot Joan Collins, but competent good-looking government workers? I can only suspend so much disbelief.

Dear Kurt: I am super excited about Hillary pioneering for women everywhere by breaking the glass ceiling, but I am having a lot of trouble accepting the sexism of those who hate crime at Hillary by holding her to the same standards of accountability and behavior that they would hold a man, and by demanding that she point to some arbitrary list of so-called “accomplishments” and “achievements” instead of appreciating the awareness she has made people aware of. And when I share my feelings about this with male-identifying persons with whom I would consider entering into an intimate relationship with after they obtain my notarized consent, they seem to lose interest. What should I do? Signed, Men Are Bad And They Also Ignore Me.

Dear Human Saltpeter: Look, being a shrill Hillary-loving harridan is never going to get you a husband. But hey, I think you should double down on your commitment to constantly nagging penis wielders by constantly reciting your list of petty grievances. Now, I don’t think it’s going to help you find an intimate life partner, but I do think it’s going to help society by ensuring that you never, ever breed.

Dear Kurt: I was a total Bernie Bro. I mean, like, his message was totally inspirational! Bernie was totally going to give us all this free stuff, like free college and free apartments and free money, but now Hillary is totally going to be the nominee and she totally wants to give us slightly less free stuff. I’m totally bummed. What should I do? Signed, Felt the Bern

Dear Bernout: You know, you seem totally stressed out by the prospect of having to actually support yourself. It’s totally unfair that so many other people are reluctant to toil on your behalf and subsidize the creative and impactful initiatives you would totally spearhead if Bernie was giving you free stuff, like smoking killer bud or following Phish around while smoking killer bud. You totally need a break from your high-pressure lifestyle! I totally recommend Venezuela. It’s a land of socialist plenty just a totally short flight away. Your dad, the insurance executive, will totally pay for it if you tell him you need money to get your Prius fixed (Wink wink!). You’ll totally love Caracas – the shopping, the food, the legendary toilet paper! Heck, you totally may never come home!

Dear Kurt: I recently graduated from Mizzou with a degree in Marxist Dance and a minor in LGBTQ?x€&*Z©K Studies. I have a $150,000 student loan debt and the only job I could get is at the Common Grounds Coffee House in Cape Girardeau steaming milk and making sure no improv groups try and take the stage during the open mics. What should I do? Signed, Loan Rager

Dear Loser: You should endure the misery created by your bad life choices for as long as it takes to pay back the hard-working taxpayers who subsidized your folly. Let your suffering be a warning and a lesson to others. Or you can do a lot of push-ups, shave your stupid goatee, and join the Army. Either one. Now fetch my latte, dork.

Dear Kurt: I am a Millennial and I feel that…

Dear Whiner: Stop right there. I don’t want to hear it.

Open Contempt

Well, we have another candidate for “If Trump wins I’m packing up my Liberal Marbles and moving somewhere else!”.

Unfortunately, it’s Supreme Court Justice. 😦

The highest court in the land. The one that is supposed to be unbiased and rule via The Constitution and only the Constitution.

But, as we all know, Liberals are far to Superior for that.

The Agenda is The Agenda.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

In an interview with the New York Times, Ginsberg laid into Trump and a possible Trump presidency:

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president,” she said. “For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.” If it did happen? “Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand,” Justice Ginsburg said, smiling ruefully.

That’s bad, folks. And it’s wrong. Judges are prohibited by Canon 5 of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges:

(A) General Prohibitions. A judge should not:

(1) act as a leader or hold any office in a political organization;

(2) make speeches for a political organization or candidate, or publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for public office;

Supreme Court Judges are not bound by these rules, but as The Washington Post points out, they are “exemplars” for the rest of the judiciary.

Then it gets worse:

Just a few days prior, she said pretty much the same thing in an interview with the Associated Press:

Asked what if Republican Donald Trump won instead, she said, “I don’t want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs.”

Speaker Ryan: “For someone on the Supreme Court who is going to be calling balls and strikes in the future based upon whatever the next president and Congress does, that strikes me as inherently biased and out of the realm.”

Coming from the latest in Jar Jar models…dubious.

CNN: “He is a faker,” she said of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, going point by point, as if presenting a legal brief. “He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.”

The Post doesn’t mince words in their analysis of this:

This was a remarkably stupid and egregious comment for a sitting Supreme Court justice to make on the record. Say what you will about Justices Antonin Scalia, who died in February, or Clarence Thomas, but they never weighed in on presidential politics quite like this. The closest example I can find is that in January 2004, during an election year, Scalia went on a hunting trip with Vice President Dick Cheney. That action alone got legal ethicists into a lather.

What Ginsburg did was way worse, though. Indeed, I can find no modern instance of a Supreme Court justice being so explicit about an election — and for good reason.

But she’s a Liberal, and you have to remember The Rules only apply to lesser beings than themselves. They are above such tawdry concern of mere mortals.

The Chicago Tribune had similar condemnation:

To say her public comments are unusual is like saying dancing cows are scarce. Supreme Court justices don’t — at least until now — take public stands on presidential or other elections. One reason is that they are barred from doing so by the federal code of judicial conduct, which states that as a general rule, judges shall not “publicly endorse or publicly oppose another candidate for public office.” They also aren’t allowed to make speeches on behalf of political organizations or give money to candidates. …

This kind of disgraceful behavior is beneath the Supreme Court. Justice Ginsberg should be ashamed of herself and step down immediately.

Er… maybe wait a few months to step down, now that I think about it. (Federalist)

CNN: Ginsburg was appointed to the high court by President Bill Clinton in 1993, and is now the senior member of the liberal wing and leading voice countering conservative Chief Justice Roberts. She has drawn a cult-like following among young people who have nicknamed her The Notorious R.B.G., a play on American rapper The Notorious B.I.G.

Acknowledging her own age and that Justices Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer will turn 80 and 78, respectively, Ginsburg said of the possible next president: “She is bound to have a few appointments (to the Supreme Court) in her term.”

Homo Superior Liberalis strikes again. Contempt is always on the menu.

ha ha ha

careless

 

BLM- Only Black Lives Matter

NEW YORK – Appearing on Face the Nation, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani addressed a few of the major problems facing the Black Lives Matter movement. Giuliani says black children have a 1% chance of being killed by police and a 99% chance of being killed by other black americans.

“When you say Black Lives Matter, that is inherently racist. Black lives matter, white lives matter, Asian lives matter, Hispanic lives matter. That’s anti-American, and it’s racist.”