Fish Meet Barrel

You just can’t make this stuff up and expect people to believe it’s real. But Liberals do it all the time and this one is utterly hilarious. I have been giggling about this one since yesterday when I found it.

Picture, years ago in schools you had religion and morality in schools. You know, things like the evil Pledge of Allegiance and the like. The Liberals objected saying it was discriminatory and the Politically Correct crowd went ape crazy. So much so that now you have no discipline and any religion, especially Christianity, even in the most mundane form (like Christmas) is taboo.

Oh, and sex education, where you used to teach abstinence as actual abstinence from sex. You left the parents to teach or not teach their kids about sex because like it or not that was the Parent’s jobm (and my parents were bad at that by the way).

Then you started to get the liberal indoctrinations. Tommy has two Mommys and the the like. Condoms on bananas for 7 year olds, etc.

All in the name of “inclusiveness” and “education” because they are going to do it anyhow saio you might as well talk about it. 🙂

Well, get ready for this one. It’s the Moby Dick (pun intended) of all Liberal “abstinence” programs.

The doublethink in this example is hilarious. Remember these are the “politically correct” who scream and yell about teaching “morality” in schools!!

And who have a conniption fit if even the merest hint of “religion” is introduced!

But most of what was on this poster in any other context would be considered X-Rated. But not for 13 years old in a classroom! Oh no! this is “health education”…

I give you Hocker Grove Middle School in Shawnee, Kansas. Yes, I said Kansas, Toto… 🙂

http://www.wfsb.com/story/24476874/kansas-father-says-schools-sex-ed-poster-is-too-mature-for-his-13-year-old-daughter

abstinence poster

The poster, entitled, “How Do People Express Their Sexual Feelings?” lists sex acts such as: Oral Sex, Sexual Fantasy, Caressing, Anal Sex, Dancing, Hugging, Touching Each Other’s Genitals, Kissing, Grinding, and Masturbation.

But don’t you dare mention GOD or any religion (other than muslim that is) or we’ll have to sue your ass off! 🙂

A father in Kansas says a sex ed poster used in his 13-year-old daughter’s class is too risqué, but school officials say it’s all part of the district-approved curriculum.

Late last week, Mark Ellis’s 13 year-old daughter showed him a picture of this poster.

“Why would you put it in front of 13 year-old students,” Ellis said.

Ellis said he thought the poster, which lists things like oral sex and grinding, might’ve been a prank until he contacted the school principal and was told it was a teaching material.

Ellis said after being told by the school principal the poster was “teaching material,” he is now concerned about what his daughter is being taught in school.

“It upsets me,” he said. “And again, it goes back to who approved this? You know this had to pass through enough hands that someone should have said, ‘Wait a minute, these are 13-year-old kids, we do not need to be this in-depth with this sexual education type of program.’”

The poster that you reference is actually part of our middle school health and science materials. And so it is a part of our district-approved curriculum,” said Leigh Anne Neal with Shawnee Mission School District. “However the item is meant to be part of a lesson, and so certainly as a standalone poster without the context of a teacher led discussion, I could see that there might be some cause for concern.”

Imagine, if this is middle school what High School Sex Education must be like? 🙂

Hookers, Live demonstrations, hands-on material 🙂 Imagine the Final Exam? The mind boogleth at the possibilities.

But Ellis said he is now concerned that what’s on this poster is being taught to his 13 year-old in school.

Neal said the poster needs to be viewed in the context of a bigger curriculum, which she calls abstinence based for students in middle school.

“The curriculum is part of it aligns with national standards around those topics, and it’s part of our curriculum in the school district,” Neal said.

But Ellis thinks if that’s the case, the curriculum needs to change.

“This has nothing to do with abstinence or sexual reproduction actually a lot of these things,” Ellis said. “I would like to see that this particular portion of the curriculum is removed from the school.”

In fact, the curriculum, titled “Making A Difference,” is published by selectmedia.org and recommended by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) as a “pregnancy prevention intervention.”

According to the publisher’s website, the goal of the program is:

…to empower young adolescents to change their behavior in ways that will reduce their risk of pregnancy and HIV or other STD infection. Specifically, this curriculum emphasizes that young adolescents should postpone sexual activity and that practicing abstinence is the only way to eliminate the risk for pregnancy and STDs, including HIV.

Module 2 of the program, which is called “Understanding Adolescent Sexuality and Abstinence,” offers “an overview of reproductive anatomy, discusses messages about sex, discusses how people express themselves sexually [apparently reinforced by the poster], and the benefits of abstinence.”

According to HHS, in the original study that explored the effectiveness of the Making A Difference program, the participants were African-Americans, aged 11-13.

So if you object are you a racist too? 🙂
A good Percentage of this “district approved” poster if it was in a movie would be X-Rated. But in a Middle School classroom, that’s ok! WOW!

Why? Because the Liberal says so and since they are never wrong and only have the best of intentions you shouldn’t be outraged that they are teaching X-Rated material to your darling little cherub in a public school!

What are you? A Right Wing Fanatic? A Hater? A Religious nut!? A Prude? A Denier?

What about all those kids who don’t have any guidance!??

But Talk about God in a classroom in even the most innocuous way and the Liberals will go ape sh*t crazy and the ACLU will be jamming legal paper down down your throat until it comes out your grandkid’s ass, but X-Rated Erotica and Oral Sex in a classroom, that’s ok!

Now that’s liberal doublethink at it’s finest.

Utterly Hilarious. And made even more hilarious by the fact that they won’t even be able to comprehend  the contradictions.

Because, as The Atlantic put it: As well, we live in a world where many parents abdicate their educational responsibilities. Should their children be consigned to ignorance, in order that the school doesn’t transgress against the rights of more responsible parents to decide exactly when their kids should be educated? Or do the needs of kids whose parents neglect to ever talk to them about sex count for just as much as the others?

Since you’re not doing your job, in our less than humble opinion, we have to step and save you from yourself!!

Sound like any liberal you know? 🙂  (Not having health insurance anyone??)

This strikes me as an impractical occasion for outrage and opposition if the practical upshot is “saving” teens from knowledge they’d quickly acquire anyway.

They’re going to do it anyways! 🙂

So why do we have a movie rating system then? If you’re going to discuss Oral Sex with a 13 year old but bar him/her from seeing a movie with it in it how is that justifiable?

Ah, the mind trap of the liberal.

I fully expect that if this gets pulled it will be blamed on “right wing religious extremists” or “Fox News” or any number of liberal boogiemen.

That is, of course, if they don’t try and bury it first!

The contradictions that they are doing X-Rated material in a classroom full of budding adolescence and calling it “abstinence” is just so far beyond their comprehension and that is truly hysterical!

And when they do do it and the 13 year old gets pregnant Planned Parenthood  and  Mama Government, and ObamaCare will right there to help them out! 🙂

I will laugh about this one for months, possibly years…Like shooting fish in a barrel!

Political Cartoons by Glenn McCoy

 

 

One Small Detail….

Political Correctness hits Comics
Superman tired of “Truth, Justice and the American Way”
…Superman announces that he is going to give up his U.S. citizenship. Despite very literally being an alien immigrant, Superman has long been seen as a patriotic symbol of “truth, justice, and the American way,” from his embrace of traditional American ideals to the iconic red and blue of his costume. What it means to stand for the “American way” is an increasingly complicated thing, however, both in the real world and in superhero comics, whose storylines have increasingly seemed to mirror current events and deal with moral and political complexities rather than simple black and white morality.

This would be another reason why I gave up comics and stay away.
Next thing you know, he’ll be for Amnesty and call Americans racists and imperalists…
An “instrument of US Policy!” Are you f*cking kidding me!
It’s F*ucking Superman for god’s sake not the Real F*cking State Department!!
It’s a F*cking Comic book!!! Not The Huffington Post! or MSNBC!!
From a “realistic” standpoint it makes sense; it would indeed be impossible for a nigh-omnipotent being ideologically aligned with America to intercede against injustice beyond American borders without creating enormous political fallout for the U.S. government. (Comics Alliance)
Time change that big red S to a Multi-cultural inclusive UN symbol.
If an American Icon doesn’t believe in American anymore….
Even a child’s icon is not safe from the Left.
So how long before Superman cartoons of old are banned as “insensitive” or even “racist”??

Not long enough I suspect.

In a blog post at The Weekly Standard, senior writer Jonathan Last questioned Superman’s beliefs, now that he seems to have rejected the United States.

“Does he believe in British interventionism or Swiss neutrality?” Last wrote. “You see where I’m going with this: If Superman doesn’t believe in America, then he doesn’t believe in anything.”

Sounds like the Left to me. 😦
So naturally when the Leftist who came up with this crap get heat for it, they downplay it as not such a big deal (which is what the Left always does) so peshaw…“In a short story in Action Comics 900, Superman announces his intention to put a global focus on his never ending battle, but he remains, as always, committed to his adopted home and his roots as a Kansas farm boy from Smallville,” they said.(Reuters)

They came for our School Boards and we said nothing.
They came for a our Mayors and we said nothing.
They came for our Cities and we said nothing.
They came for our courts and we said nothing.
They came for our food and we said nothing.
They came for our newspapers and we said nothing.
They came for our social media and we said nothing.
Now they want our childhood Icons…

If Superman is no longer on our side the only reasonable government response is to make sure he cannot harm the United States. The Defense Department should embark on a program to harness the power of kryptonite in various forms to provide a robust series of options should Superman decide that something the United States is up to does not pass his new rarefied sense of internationalist propriety. Perhaps Lex Luthor, wherever he is, would be interested in an amnesty deal in exchange for some of the anti-Superman technologies he has developed over the years. The government should also stockpile whatever types of kryptonite are available, and issue a statement to the supervillains of the universe that the United States is no longer responsible for Superman’s actions. Clark Kent’s new tax status will have to be determined by the IRS.

So long Superman, you illegal alien ingrate. (Washington Times)

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

One Small Detail:

A few months after the Obama Administration bragged about enacting “sweeping” legislation to protect the nation’s food supply, experts at a federal symposium reveal that half of what Americans eat comes from foreign countries not covered by the measure.

This leaves the nation vulnerable to bioterrorism via tainted food, according to experts participating in the FBI’s International Symposium on Agroterrorism http://www.fbi-isa.org/(X(1)S(l42untmfulwen2ud5kp3ycmf))/default.aspx?MenuItemID=73&MenuGroup=Home+Left+Menu&&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 The annual event, taking place in Kansas City this week, aims to protect the world’s food supply from terrorism through information-sharing and collaboration among governments, the private sector and academia.

The world-renowned agroterrorism experts attending this year’s symposium have some rather worrisome news for Americans, despite the president’s political horn-tooting. Because it’s nearly impossible to know where 50% of our food comes from, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to protect consumers from tainted supplies as well as intentional bioterrorism attacks.

*************

Satellite navigation system maker TomTom indirectly sells details of motorists’ driving behaviour to the police for use in determining where speed traps should be placed, the AD reports on Wednesday. Almost half the country’s police forces use this method of deciding where to put cameras and speed checks, the paper says. This is over in the Netherlands, but would anyone care to bet whether Google and Apple, for example, sell their Satnav data? You do realize that your pretty GPS in the car is well-aware of exactly how fast you’re driving at any given point in time, right? And that this information is their data, not yours, right? Just like driving with a video camera in your car pointing right at the speedometer along where an exact location at all times. In fact, that’s exactly what you just let the cops do. Welcome to the police state, where your “convenience” becomes their ability to hand you a $500 ticket. (Freedomphoenix)

****

Facebook’s current feature uses facial recognition technology to pick out faces in your photos. Once you’ve uploaded your album, Facebook will take you to a new screen where you can enter the name of each person below their face. Sometimes (depending on your privacy settings and the clarity of the photo), Facebook will go a step further: If a face matches one you previously tagged in another album, Facebook may suggest that person’s name for you. Facebook quietly added the feature to the Privacy Settings, allowing users to disable the peppy-sounding ‘Suggest photos of me to friends’ option.

It’s just one small detail…We’re so doomed…