Scientists have discovered a powerful new strain of fact-resistant humans who are threatening the ability of Earth to sustain life, a sobering new study reports.
The research, conducted by the University of Minnesota, identifies a virulent strain of humans who are virtually immune to any form of verifiable knowledge, leaving scientists at a loss as to how to combat them.
More worryingly, Logsdon said, “As facts have multiplied, their defenses against those facts have only grown more powerful.”
While scientists have no clear understanding of the mechanisms that prevent the fact-resistant humans from absorbing data, they theorize that the strain may have developed the ability to intercept and discard information en route from the auditory nerve to the brain. “The normal functions of human consciousness have been completely nullified,” Logsdon said.
While reaffirming the gloomy assessments of the study, Logsdon held out hope that the threat of fact-resistant humans could be mitigated in the future. “Our research is very preliminary, but it’s possible that they will become more receptive to facts once they are in an environment without food, water, or oxygen,” he said. (24media)
And here’s one of the way of inoculating people with it.
On his nightly show, Bill O’Reilly trumpeted, “New study by the conservative Media Research Center. It says that so far in the campaign 432 minutes were devoted to Trump controversies by the evening network newscasts. Just 105 minutes were spent on Hillary Clinton’s controversies including the big email investigation.”
The Media Research Center looked at more than 1,000 presidential election stories covered by networks from January 1st, through June 7th. It found controversies involving Trump got four times as much coverage as Clinton scandals. This chart showing the Republican presumptive nominee getting 432 minutes of coverage compared to Clinton’s 105.
Sean Hannity saw this as “stunning proof that the mainstream elite media is in the tank for Hillary Clinton.” He contrasted, “They devoted four times more air time covering Trump’s so-called controversies than they did reporting on Hillary Clinton’s numerous scandals.”
In the study, author Rich Noyes revealed, “Compared to Clinton, a much higher percentage of Trump’s airtime (40 percent, or 432 minutes) was spent discussing the controversies surrounding the Republican’s candidacy. Only 18 percent of Clinton’s coverage (105 minutes) was spent discussing similar controversies, as network reporters paid scant attention to stories that would have garnered far more airtime had Trump been involved.”
Immunize people with Anti-Trump virus. Ignore Hillary. 🙂